Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

how does everyone keep track of their workouts?

I use the Jefit app on my phone, keeps track of all my logs and lifts, can add notes if I feel the need and has made it easy to keep track of my workout volume.

Simple notepad file on tablet.

I run endomondo also to keep track of time spent and rest periods and check email, facebook during breaks and sometimes youtube clips on form.

I'm at home though so using a tablet to play my music and record notes doesn't seem as nerdy when you are flying solo.

Deadlift 220kg Birds. In your next deadlift session.. Do it once at least & receive a virtual high five.

You will do it ha ha...

No seriously lift 220.... I am confident you can do it.

Hahaha. Right now I'm confident I could get 200 up; I don't want to try it though, cause my form will be terrible. I'm currently fixing my form with more volume at lower weights for now, as my lower back was getting a bit sore with my "yanking" as Markos calls it.

Also want my squats to catch up, because they are far behind my deads at the moment. But soon I'll return to the deadlift 1RMs and I'll definitely give 220 a crack! Tough ask for a tall skinny 80kg not going to PTC :P

I used to have just a generic diary and would scribble shit down in there, but now I just use a very basic notepad app on my phone. Only really need like 2 weeks of notes at any time to skim back through anyway.

Lunges are the worst torture known to man. I'm properly struggling to stand...squats never did this to me!

They just have this ability to extend the set beyond physical pain and it becomes all about how much you can put up with mentally.

Yea walking lunges say.....for a about 20-30 meters with lots of weight on a barbell on your back is the worst kind of pain especially after the half way mark where you just want to give up because of the intense burn. Not to mention the nice cardio workout that comes with it. I do them twice a week and have developed excellent shape as a result. Squats had sliced my lower back in two so utter fail for me :(

Eating peanut butter

This. lol. And incline leg press (plate loaded). Got up to 360kg for my working sets, so at least I wasn't being a bitch on the thing.

Looks like my ROM issue through my shoulders wasn't quite as bad as I thought, since it was pointed out I had the bar way too low anyway haha...so now that I'm resting it in a more appropriate position as well as stretching my chest/shoulders/etc beforehand, I can do barbell squats again.....my traps are f**king obliterated though, not used to having weight resting on them >.< will get used to that though.

Best part is 100kg feels like nothing! (inb4 that asshat Markos pointing out 100kg IS nothing :P). Should be back up to a more appropriate weight in no time. Will increase 5-10kg for the next couple of sessions, then 2.5kg every session without fail from then on.

Markos, I remember you saying not long ago that nothing you see amazes you anymore. I'm curious: what's the most impressive or amazing thing you've ever seen with regard to lifting?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...