Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

^Same

Also I'm meant to be cutting, not a competing strongman lol.

Currently eating Chilliz. Fail

Looks good to me

img_9268.jpg

Rice and meat is all I ate in Asia...ended up losing weight lol

same, in conjuction with iifym

Havent been following my macros for a while now. I've slumped back into around 1400 calories a day, just not hungry atm.

Out of curiosity what is your weight Leesh?

Getting the wifey on a program and just trying to figure out a base calorie range for the day. Currently at 1,280 calories @ 63kg according to my fitness pal

Out of curiosity what is your weight Leesh?

Getting the wifey on a program and just trying to figure out a base calorie range for the day. Currently at 1,280 calories @ 63kg according to my fitness pal

57kg

After some suggestions if you please guys and gals.

So my little sister wants a program to do but at the moment she can only use machines, until someone shows her compounds.

(If she doesn't see a pt I'll show her when I see her in a month or so)

Should I put her on some kind of split or still try do a full body using the machines?

Once I've shown her the movements I'll probably get her to do Markos beginner program or something similar.

I usually consume 1900 calories a day and I would recommend iifym for that rather than my fitness pal

Wow you must either be very active or have a a high metabolism!

Good for when you need to cut hey :D

Wow you must either be very active or have a a high metabolism!

Good for when you need to cut hey :D

That is fairly normal for a female her weight/ size.

People that cut on less usually have a large cheat day or binge, not being consistent.

If you feel it's high in comparison to your intake, you really should be looking into what you can do to improve your maintenance.

I agree Birds - it's the fake natties that everyone hates, because they aren't truthful.

From what I've read, it seems quite pointless to start cycling until you're near your genetic potential as well - most of the people I know on test do not look that big / or are hugely strong. Biggest benefits seem to be the recovery ability and being able to eat whatever crap and not put on fat.

The other amusing part is that only a couple have a good understanding of what PCT is and how to go about it.

On an unrelated note, I started using chalk the other day, best training related decision I've made since going from a bro split to a proper beginner strength program.

Edited by bozodos

Chalk is a godsend for dead lifts. Everyone I've given it to has hated it at first and hated the feel until they added 20-30kg to their deadlift in an instant lol. I'm now supplying my gym with chalk cause they never fill the bowl :(

Wow you must either be very active or have a a high metabolism!

Good for when you need to cut hey :D

It's not that much food, but Birds volume training helps to keep her thin given I've banned her from most of her old cardio activities :P

After some suggestions if you please guys and gals.

So my little sister wants a program to do but at the moment she can only use machines, until someone shows her compounds.

(If she doesn't see a pt I'll show her when I see her in a month or so)

Should I put her on some kind of split or still try do a full body using the machines?

Once I've shown her the movements I'll probably get her to do Markos beginner program or something similar.

Mate I would get her training mobility exercises, stretches, body resistance and supporting muscle exercises just so that she can get her body in good condition to start training the compounds properly when someone has a chance to show her.

That is fairly normal for a female her weight/ size.

People that cut on less usually have a large cheat day or binge, not being consistent.

If you feel it's high in comparison to your intake, you really should be looking into what you can do to improve your maintenance.

Exactly; 1900 calories is actually under what I'm meant to be consuming. Iifym suggests 2100 calories a day for my size and activity level, but I've found a happy medium. The 130g of protein a day is more important to me :)

Mate I would get her training mobility exercises, stretches, body resistance and supporting muscle exercises just so that she can get her body in good condition to start training the compounds properly when someone has a chance to show her.

Yeah she's pretty cluey and is already doing basic body weight stuff, pullups, dips, pushups, etc. Knows a lot of stretches and mobility stuff from dancing.

Might just keep her doing that until she gets taught the compounds.

If she's a dancer she's probably got good flexibility and mobility all round, in which case yeah, you could get her doing some machine versions of compound exercises just to get her started - it's better than nothing or doing freeweights the wrong way. Machine bench, lat pulldown, seated rows, leg press etc.

That is fairly normal for a female her weight/ size.

People that cut on less usually have a large cheat day or binge, not being consistent.

If you feel it's high in comparison to your intake, you really should be looking into what you can do to improve your maintenance.

Ahh it is more so that compared to the girls at my work they seem to be eating in the 1200-1500 calorie range. Maybe they just dont eat enough

If she's a dancer with good flexibility we need pics...

For science.

I can confirm for science

If she's a dancer she's probably got good flexibility and mobility all round, in which case yeah, you could get her doing some machine versions of compound exercises just to get her started - it's better than nothing or doing freeweights the wrong way. Machine bench, lat pulldown, seated rows, leg press etc.

Ah brilliant I forgot about lat pull down :) thanks

If she's a dancer with good flexibility we need pics...

For science.

Unfortunately for her she looks a bit like a female version of me, so you probably don't want pics hahaha

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...