Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah Birds. Going back a couple of years, my sticking point was always breaking the bar off the floor. Now, this is where that article I posted comes into play - I believe my hips were too low to begin with. I made an adjustment to the setup based on this idea, late last week, and the movement felt substantially more efficient. It'll take a few weeks for me to adjust before I can try for a near maximum weight again using the "new" form, but I think I'm onto something.

While my deads are going well and bench is also good (with DBs anyway), squat has gone backwards. Really not happy about that. Damn sitting down all day at work doesn't help.

There's a million ways to do a deadlift, but the heart of the movement is that it's predominantly a back exercise and keeping that in mind will definitely help to lift stronger.

Some people start the a deadlift in the squat position and turn it into more of a squat movement, reducing leverage and efficiency when the weight is sitting in front of the body rather than above it. To raise the hips and keep the back straight requires a degree of hamstring flexibility, so I think people guilty of turning it into a squat either lack this or try to protect their back by making it a squat (following the old/flawed "don't lift with your back" adage).

Some people tend to complicate the movement by turning what is actually a simple, automatic motion into too many steps...and overthink it...causing their body not to work in one fluid motion. When I've taught people deadlifts (including my 60 year old mother), the golden rule I've told them to focus on is keeping the shoulders back and stick the chest out - this simple process forces the rest of the body into a favorable position for efficient lifting that they don't even know they are in. I do keep an eye on the hips to make sure they aren't sitting too low and making it a squat, but everyone is different here with how their body is setup to lift.

I've had something similar myself; it seems whenever my squat is going well or I'm making PBs, the deadlift is at a standstill or slightly back, and vice versa. Sometimes I put that down to tiredness / session overlap.

They do use much the same muscles, so not uncommon for one to impact the other.

When i was younger, and fitter, i worked as a painter. We did a highrise in the city.

My personal record was 2x 20l drums (40-50kg, paint is heavy) running up 9 floors.

Now im lazy as sht, and would probly have a heart attack running 100m.

  • Like 1

As my back seems better after a rest I am starting the 531 again, I have knocked up a program inspired by Jim Wendler, its got some fluff supersets and some other vanity exercises, but all in all I like it.

I've posted up the excel program where you just enter PB weight and reps into a yellow box and then your 1RM into another yellow box, this will fill in the program for Mil Press, Dead's, Clean and Press, Bench and Squat.

The clean and press day is like a rest day, I just focus on form and a strict press.

The fluff is for you to fill in.

The percentages are from the 531 book.

Do what you want with it.

It takes about 1hr to get through the training taking rest breaks of 3 min for the heavy sets and 1 or 2 min for the warm ups and the fluff, I usually take 10 minutes to warm up which also involves the first 3 warm up sets.

Training 531 - Copy.xlsx

  • Like 1

Enjoyed 5/3/1 and made some good increases on a couple of PBs. I particularly noticed that by pushing myself on the OHP it benefited my bench pressing. I also like how you can opt for the BBB (boring but big) and not much about with the accessory stuff too much if you're short on time.

I have found it to be the simplest program for getting stronger and the "thick" look, I have got time to kill every arvo so I like to throw in some fluff to give my vanity some time, the fluff does help with the getting a bit of the cu t look.

I also feel the clean and press is one of the best exersices out there, strangely hardly anyone does them.

Yeah I tried out just some hang cleans for a while and obviously I was shocking at them while starting out, but I could feel how they were hitting the traps. And it's good to work more oly-style explosiveness into the training too I believe. I don't want to end up with good size, but just really slow, and tight with flexibility issues. That explosiveness is pretty important in all the compound movements anyway hey.

I need to work more on my flexibility, my hamstrings need some serious work.

For years I would work on my flexibility for the same amount of time as my strength training, sadly I backed of on it for a few years and I am now paying for it.

Over the last couple of weeks I have got back into working on it, foam rolling, rolling around on a cricket ball and stretching whenever I watch the TV.

I'm 50 in a couple of months, if I want to keep lifting (and sleeping without back pain) I need to sort this out, other wise injuries will keep coming fast and furious.

Yeah Mark don't we all... Especially those of us who have a desk job, sitting down all day wreaks havoc on the posterior chain - weak glutes and lower back, tight hammies, poor ankle mobility, hunched shoulders, etc

Foam rolling is excellent, and I've tried the lacrosse ball as well. The relief afterwards is almost worth the pain of rolling...

Luckily I don't get back pain when sleeping. How do you go with lower back intensive exercises like the DL, RDLs, bent over rows, good mornings?

I love the pain of foam rolling, like a deep tissue massage

Never used to like being pushed and prodded in that way, used to hate massages too, but it makes the muscles and joints in the posterior chain feel so good after some tenderising and a few cracks

  • Like 2

What are peoples opinions on here about the ideal program to re start your training after some time off due to travelling and a surgical procedure?

My gut tells me something like a starting strength program, although my knowledge tells me it may be better to ease into it with something less joint intensive rather than stretch out a lower weight phase of a strength program.

maybe a 5x5 rotating 3 days plus 1 rest, keeping it simple with only a main lift (squat, bench, dead) accompanied by another smaller complimenting compound for each session? So like Day 1 = squat + lunges; Day 2 = bench + dips; Day 3 = deadlifts + pull ups

start low, increase 5-10kg (or less) depending on exercise and current weight.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
×
×
  • Create New...