Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok...

I wonder what the sixth gear ratio from the 350Z is in comparison to the fifth gear from the GTT...

If it is no taller then it kinda compromises my goal of a 'cruise' gear... I mean even a gain of a coouple of hundred rpm would suffice...

Where can I find some stats on the gear ratios from both the 350Z and the GTT??

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

But the 6spd is going to be a close ratio box so you can run a lower final drive (ie 3.69) in the diff and still have good acceleration, yet 6th gear will be at much lower RPM on the highway even if 6th is near/same ratio as 5th in a 5spd. 9as opposed to 5spd with 4.11)

  PT said:
But the 6spd is going to be a close ratio box so you can run a lower final drive (ie 3.69) in the diff and still have good acceleration, yet 6th gear will be at much lower RPM on the highway even if 6th is near/same ratio as 5th in a 5spd. 9as opposed to 5spd with 4.11)

Is the Zed's final drive 3.69 is it???

So what RPM difference would I acquire with 6th gear and the Zed box compared to 5th in my GTT box?

Edited by Marco-R34GTT
  Marco-R34GTT said:
HHmmmmmm, what sort of a difference would that yield??? 150/200rpm???

Wrong way matey. Zed box will make it rev higher at 110.

Looking at it, even dropping in 3.9:1 diff gears will be the only way to do it nicely (hopefully the speedo can be corrected with the speedo sender cog or something else) but even then its only about ~150rpm difference.. If you were looking for an increase in fuel economy i'd be looking somewhere else.

As an aside, I don't really mind the 4.375:1's in my car at highway speeds.

aussie zed specs.. http://www.nissan.com.au/z/specifications.asp

Edited by heller44

Changing the Diff ratio would be the easiest. Prior to owning my R34 GT I had 2 commodores a black manual & a white auto (4 speed), both had the same diff ratio (3.08:1), the black manual at 110 kph sat on 2500 rpm where as the white auto at 110 kph sat at 2000 rpm, I did some research and found that the auto top gear was 0.70:1 & the manual 5th gear is 0.81:1. Now the Skyline 5th gear is in between the commodore at 0.759:1 with a 4.111 diff ratio.

So looking at it if you can get 3.08 diff ratio it should give you say 110kph @ 2250rpm or there abouts

Hope this can help,

Phillip :D

Yeah, thats got me thinking...

Obviously with the Zed's six speed box, and the GTT final drive, of course the revs would be higher..

However, if I manage to use the Zed's box with the equivalent ratio diff....

What I'd like to find out, if anyone here drives a 350Z, is what RPM they do at 120kph... Then I'd know whether the drivetrain would be suitable or not..

convert it to a girlie box *auto*. it'll give you a nice overdrive and you could have it shift kitted so that when you wana give it some stick it'll do the job.

or wait auto's are heavier on the juice :S

I mean no malice when I say this...

But I'd rather torch my car than convert it to auto, I had an Auto N/A VL crumbledore and I will never drive another auto again....

just to help guys. the 32/33 5th gear is .83.

whereas the 34gtr 6th is .79

but the 32/33 rear diff is 4.11.1

the 34gtr rear diff is 3.45.1

hence the lower revs on the 34.

i am led to believe the reason nissan used the getrag box was to decrease the gaps between gears, hence quicker acceration as you are in the boost range more.. bernie

350z doesn't really rev that low at 100, I'll check next time Kel lets me drive it, but it feels like 6th in the z = 5th in the stagea, so its no better. I think the z box is shorter in 1-4, i never use 5th and 6th like i said the same as 5th in other cars.

anway....diff is the simplest way to lower the overall revs.

Yeah I realise that, I'm just hoping not to entirely kill the acceleration either... Shorter ratios allow for sharper acceleration whilst the taller final drive will allow me some scope to 'cruise' in top gear...

If that makes sense, sry, I'm posting after a very big aussie daayy..

Ok Folks, I asked Yo-Yo, who owns both an R34 GTT and a 350Z to take both for a spin and see what RPM's both cars achieved @ 110kph.

Here are the results for anyone who is interested...

  Quote
Hi mate,

Got around to seeing the rpms for ya:

GT- T: 2,900RPM @ 110km/h (5th gear)

350 Z: 3,000RPM @ 110km/h (5th gear)

2,400RPM @ 110km/h (6th gear)

Good luck with the eventual conversion

hope that helps;

PJ

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Got the gearbox in and the front drive shafts.
    • Hi There I went through a rabbit hole of reading about Xenon headlights and the ADR regulations for having them installed. As people have been defected by running factory xenon I was researching in ways to make them compliant. Everyone always say needs to be self leveling and have washer installed, which I don't necessarily agree with. For this argument I'm using R34 as reference as I'm more aware on the construction of the headlight compared to the R33 Xenon, which may still be the exact same case.   For the self leveling clause taken from ADR 13 - Installation of Lighting and Light Signalling Devices on other than L-Group Vehicles As you can see the bold text "these manually adjustable devices from driver seats" are fine to use. As Series 1 Xenon model headlights do have a 4 level adjuster on the right near the ignition (however not series 2) then these model are consider compliant in that argument.   For the Self Cleaning aspect of this argument clause taken from ADR 13 - Installation of Lighting and Light Signalling Devices on other than L-Group Vehicles Now i can understand the argument that Xenon will need a washer as they are over 2000 lumens, but I clicked on the 12 at the end of that sentence and it takes me to the end notes which states R34 for headlight lenses are plastic, not sure if PL is mark as I don't currently have my skyline to confirm that marking is there. But could you not technically get a lenses with the PL marking on it and then get away with the argument that you need a washer. I went through a quick read of the adr and might have missed something else that may cause them to be non-complaint.    But wouldn't these technically be complaint headlights   Would love to hear other people input on this and shed some light   Edit In regard to the the washer portion I might be mistaken ADR 45 (which I believe is Regulation NO.45) states 12 cd (candela) I dont understand that portion in regarding to calculating the candela if anyone can shed some light. Otherwise I guess throw in a washer for the headlight and you definitely comply.
    • Took it to all Japan day, flogged the hell out of it and took it all, am a very very happy man  don’t know how that ended up in Greg’s thread before
    • Hey Nismo, any chance in the world you still have these seats?
    • I'd say closer to OG GTX3582R, just smaller trim - so 59mm inducer/82mm exducer as opposed to 62/82 for the first gen GTX3582R. Yeah EFRs were boss, the EFR8474 is still an absolute beast and it perplexes me that people still go to things like Turbosmart/Garrett etc when the results people are getting with those are pretty unremarkable compared to what you could get with a turbo available well before those options came out.  DriftSquid (I think) "upgraded" from an EFR9174 to a Turbosmart turbo and promised a comparison video - and kinda shuffled awkwardly and did a bit of diversion from the fact that they didn't get any improvement going to the currently massively hyped brand of turbo from a turbo that was a bit of a frankenstein that had been well superceded in it's own range before the Turbosmart unit he put on there even came out. I suspect the EFR would outperform most Xonas for what a lot of less-insane RB owners would go for, in the 400-600kw range but the Xonas are looking hard to beat up to maybe in the mid 700kw range at this stage- basically where EFRs don't really reach, and before the Precision turbos take over.  What the Xonas do well in the "EFR range" is be easier to package etc, and work very well if a divided housing doesn't suit your application.  
×
×
  • Create New...