Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i have a 3540 with the smallest exhaust housing on a 25det and a stretched rev limiter to 7,500 and it wakes up late 3,000's but pulls very very hard to the limiter.

so on a rb20 it will be alot of more laggy

i would go a 3071R or a 3076R .63 for rb20

i have a 3540 with the smallest exhaust housing on a 25det and a stretched rev limiter to 7,500 and it wakes up late 3,000's but pulls very very hard to the limiter.

so on a rb20 it will be alot of more laggy

i would go a 3071R or a 3076R .63 for rb20

Yeh, no doubt woudl be laggy. But if ppl put them on big power SR20s then i see no reason why not an RB20. Only you would want it to be a dyno car or a drag car, not a daily streeter.

If you are running 81mm pistons for a bump in displacement, with around 9.0:1 compression. Dont go too big on cam duration, say 256 and 8.8mm lift. Stick with std inlet manifold and make sure the 3540 is running a nice exhaust manifold and is well tuned with cam gears used to dial it all in.

I see no reason why the thing wont be on song in the mid 5,000rpm range. Wil be able to rev the thing to 8,800rpm and make a good wack of power, around 320-340rwkws (depending on the turbo spec)

Worst case throw a shorter diff ratio in the thing.

Whether it makes sense to do all this to an RB20 instead of a bigger brother its hard to know and not for us to say. But if you want a more streetable setup with i would think a 3076 woudl definitely give you a better compromise of power nad drivability.

Have you looked at the Turbonetics or ITS range ?

yeah i was assuming that it would be more laggy because of a smaller displacement engine with more pistons, so a shorter stroke? but sr20s are the same displacement with less pistons so bigger bore x stroke?

if its a streeter no way i would put that on a sr20 without MASSIVE cams and a 9,000rpm limiter, just too big of a turbo for down low power.

pffff dont listen to the RB20 haters. im putting a GT3040 on my RB20, will be slightly less laggy.

if you want response obviously its far to big, but with a full build it will be alot of fun.

two words.

do it......

there was a r32 in a recent zoom issue with a built rb20/gt3540

specs below, that motor has since expired but meh.....

To cut the list short -

Forged internals

Standard cams

Tomei cam gears (in anticipation for cams.....)

GT3540 turbo (high mount)

Turbosmart 38mm ext. wastegate (with screamer, love that sound!!)

110mm thick front mount

3 inch dump into 4 inch exhaust

Nismo 555cc injectors

Bosch 500hp fuel pump

Link ECU (upgrading to Microtech LT-12 this week)

Turbosmart E-Boost2

Alloy triple-flow radiator

Car made 293rwkw/393rwhp @ 21psi (more to come). Would post up the dyno sheet but I don't have a scanner!

Is also featured in current issue of ZOOM (# 118)

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Rb...html&st=140

^^ RB20 power thread is the best place to look. theres another two GT30 series powered RB20's on the page after the above one.

Edited by esky_mad
QUOTE(LTHLRB @ 20 Jan 2008, 02:31 PM)

i have a 3540 with the smallest exhaust housing on a 25det and a stretched rev limiter to 7,500 and it wakes up late 3,000's but pulls very very hard to the limiter.

so on a rb20 it will be alot of more laggy

i would go a 3071R or a 3076R .63 for rb20

same here. i have a .82 rear housing. and boost comes on at about 3200-3500.. a greddy plenum helps.

if u are after PEAK power go for it mate. but it will only last for 2000rpm..

if your after response AND decent power go a 3071R

yeah mine comes on at around that aswell.. last time i drove it i stopped looking at the tacho and concerntrated on keeping it straight it shot up very fast fron around the 3000's thats full boost, not starting, but already at 18psi

respect to the almighty gt3540....

if u want a kick in the pants and would be happy with a constant whiplash injury go the 3540... but as i said before on a rb20....it will only last for 3sec :)

it just wouldnt do it, u or the car any justice

Edited by r33cruiser
pffff dont listen to the RB20 haters. im putting a GT3040 on my RB20, will be slightly less laggy.

if you want response obviously its far to big, but with a full build it will be alot of fun.

two words.

do it......

there was a r32 in a recent zoom issue with a built rb20/gt3540

specs below, that motor has since expired but meh.....

To cut the list short -

Forged internals

Standard cams

Tomei cam gears (in anticipation for cams.....)

GT3540 turbo (high mount)

Turbosmart 38mm ext. wastegate (with screamer, love that sound!!)

110mm thick front mount

3 inch dump into 4 inch exhaust

Nismo 555cc injectors

Bosch 500hp fuel pump

Link ECU (upgrading to Microtech LT-12 this week)

Turbosmart E-Boost2

Alloy triple-flow radiator

Car made 293rwkw/393rwhp @ 21psi (more to come). Would post up the dyno sheet but I don't have a scanner!

Is also featured in current issue of ZOOM (# 118)

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Rb...html&st=140

^^ RB20 power thread is the best place to look. theres another two GT30 series powered RB20's on the page after the above one.

Yes but if you read the article closely it doesnt even start to see positive pressure untill 4600rpm

Buy that time even old dak daks will have hosed you off the road.

think of it this way......nothing nothing nothing......boost...wheel spin....rev limit, change gear and repeat....

GT3076 at the most for a street car.

But its your car so do what u like. :blink:

boo to the RB20 haters.

with the right cams you can dial in more than respectable response for the loyal old beast.

remember people that youre comparing other motors to the RB20, which is kinda dumb considering there in a completely different league.

i say go for it mate. then if you dont like it change the turbo.

Buy that time even old dak daks will have hosed you off the road.

But its your car so do what u like. :D

in my opinion i couldnt care less if a dodgy old non turb r33 beat me, cause i know id be having a hell of a lot more fun. isnt that what modifying your car is all about.

that last comment always annoys me :blink:

my 2c.

pffff dont listen to the RB20 haters. im putting a GT3040 on my RB20, will be slightly less laggy.

if you want response obviously its far to big, but with a full build it will be alot of fun.

two words.

do it......

there was a r32 in a recent zoom issue with a built rb20/gt3540

specs below, that motor has since expired but meh.....

To cut the list short -

Forged internals

Standard cams

Tomei cam gears (in anticipation for cams.....)

GT3540 turbo (high mount)

Turbosmart 38mm ext. wastegate (with screamer, love that sound!!)

110mm thick front mount

3 inch dump into 4 inch exhaust

Nismo 555cc injectors

Bosch 500hp fuel pump

Link ECU (upgrading to Microtech LT-12 this week)

Turbosmart E-Boost2

Alloy triple-flow radiator

Car made 293rwkw/393rwhp @ 21psi (more to come). Would post up the dyno sheet but I don't have a scanner!

Is also featured in current issue of ZOOM (# 118)

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Rb...html&st=140

^^ RB20 power thread is the best place to look. theres another two GT30 series powered RB20's on the page after the above one.

meh you could do that with a TD06 and far less lag.... 293rwkw is nothing special...

with the right cams you can dial in more than respectable response for the loyal old beast.

your a bloody idiot esky mad.

such noobieness.

just go a 3071R or a 3076R .63 for rb20

ONLY if u like driving around on vacuum would u ever go a 3540

i agree with uras on this one, the td06 is underated. on a built engine with boost above 20 psi you will crack 300 rwkws and have so much better response than the 3540. some one has to say it lol, look at roys he uses a td06 on a 20 and that thing is wicked, not even a built engine and manages 260 or so, i know which one is the better choice. but hey up to you

i agree with uras on this one, the td06 is underated. on a built engine with boost above 20 psi you will crack 300 rwkws and have so much better response than the 3540. some one has to say it lol, look at roys he uses a td06 on a 20 and that thing is wicked, not even a built engine and manages 260 or so, i know which one is the better choice. but hey up to you

yup... even the baby 06 the L2 makes 265-275rwkw at 1.2bar with std eng and 256/264's and will have upto 50-70rwkw more throughout the mid. At 1.5bar with plenum and 272's it would match that 290-300rwkw and still have much more mid.... or simply get the SH 06. the 3071R is also a good option but they are soft to drive and are no match for an 06.

Im my experience there are only two choices for rb20:

td06

and HKS GT2835 0.61 52t which is the small inlet version.

I think I can speak here as I have a little experance with this , I currently run a gt3040R on an rb20 a built engine and I spent thousands getting it to flow its great as it boosts pretty early and is fairly powerful car ran an 11.7 at wsid ,while this is great for a track car its not for a streeter as when it comes on boost its wheel speen city even with perrilli P zero's and on low boost ,low boost it makes 240rwkw but the way it comes on is a rush of power from 3900rpm to 5100rpm it goes from about 80rwkw to 288rwkw so in 1200rpm it makes 208rwkw thats a lot of power for the rear wheels to hold

I would tend to agree with Roy and URAS ,from graphs I've seen the tdo6 has a lot more linial power delivery to the garrett turbos as they come on in a rush and the gt3540 would be worse than mine .

I dont drive my car on the street anymore as for one its just too wild and two with the new hoon laws with that sorta power delivery with out r spec tyres there aint gonna be any traction and in front of a cop bye bye car so my engine is coming out the car is going back to stock to be sold of and I've now got a gtr so got better chance of keeping the power to the ground . This is just my opinion but hope it helps

cheers Peter

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, you're wrong, and you've always been wrong about this. The Nismo has 2 sets of openings. One is a real 2-way, and the other is a 1-way. There is no 1.5-way possible with the ramps that they offer. A real 1.5-way does exist. That Cusco stuff I posted is a prime example. If the forward drive ramps are, say 55°, and the overrun ramps are, say, 30°, then you will get about half as much LSD effect on overrun than you do on drive. It is real, it realy works. OK, you're slightly right. The Nismo has 55° and 45° ramps on the 2-way, so it does offer less LSD effect on overrun. But, I think that just means that they've (probably) sensibly established that you do not want actually equal LSD effect on overrun. You just want "quite a lot, but not quite as much as the drive LSD effect".
    • Just wanted to unearth this and post my baby with the new front ❤️😝 Took her to my wedding rehearsal today. Next up is getting wide skirts (after wedding)
    • Yea, that is what I was getting at in my ramblings too. The nismo one actually is a 1.5 way and a 1 way. They don't do a *2* way because a true *2* way would have equal ramp angles. Or is that a true 1.5 way? Realistically I think a "1.5 way" does not actually exist. A diff can either lock in two directions or one. It also doesn't help that a LOT of people in Australia speak about 1.5 way diffs are referring to their 1 way diff.
    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
×
×
  • Create New...