Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 172
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

evil weevil - is this the pic that you wanted?? :rolleyes:

post-26053-1201245067_thumb.jpg

the car might make 15 - 20

maybe 14....

but the top 10 no way

that car??.....top 5 for sure man......fulli hektiknez just overwhelms all other competitors.

that car??.....top 5 for sure man......fulli hektiknez just overwhelms all other competitors.

ahahah nah man, i meant the gtr......

but sure, for the hektik bros out there teh vl might even hit the top 3

Well into the top 10, being 4wd and basically purpose built it will flog em on the track....also the straight they use isn't huge so terminal speed shouldnt come into it. Its a stretch but it may well top the table... as stated purpose built 4wd it will be right at home.

lol

We'll see....... >_< at the peeps talking about "keeping it in it's usable power band" ect.. you'd think it's a big single turbo r32 we were discussing.. Intead of a 3.8 v6 twin tubo with an almost linear power delivery, the cars not a pig on the track regardless of track size as it's testing has already shown. Could be something to do with the design brief to build a car with "supercar stats" instead of a GT production racer. The r35 is a few generations more advanced than all previous gtr's and is also in a different class.

Lol you must old calling me son...Lad >_<

Nah I doubt it... it was a throw line away as if to say I wouldn't be suprised where it came.

The a10 does have it on power to weight and although it's distibution of weight is near perfect....but it's still a 460kw RWD which makes it a bit of a handful on tightish tracks without a huge straight. The stig will be able to wring the life out of the GTR without much care, the car won't dissappear in a cloud of smoke. It'll be interesting to see.

Edited by madbung

The response of the new R35 GTR on a very tight 'driver training' track was insane, looked absolutely balanced. I think you can forget it's going to have any problems.I talked to the guy pedaling it and he said it felt incredible and had balance unlike any car he had ever driven, including much smaller worked over evo's, the car is just planted to the road.

I'm thinking between the Z06 and the Ascari.

If anything, the GTR MAY come close to matching the time of the LP640; but i still find it difficult to see how it will beat the time of anything faster than that. Those cars might be RWD, but they weren't exactly struggling for traction when driven by the Stig (if i remember correctly).

being such a small track i dont think that outright power and top speed r going to come into it, i dont think it will make the top 10 maybe top 15 but there are some awesome cars on that list like ther koeniggseg (or whatever) which r tiny and seriously fly.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey crew, Failed my WOF cause of a lower control arm, and I've decided to hit both arms, and also the compression rods at the same time(seems they're gonna be the most likely upcoming failure points from some discussions with the lads over on the G35 reddit). I've looking at these form Z1:  https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-compression-rod-p-40716.html https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-lower-control-arm-p-40674.html I asked Z1 if they'd work as it's the same platform, just RHD vs LHD. I basically got told "Lol dunno". Specifically they aren't aware of any difference but can't guarantee fitment as they haven't done it on a 350GT. So guess I'm asking is if there is any issues with using 2005 G35 coupe suspension parts on a 2005 350GT coupe? Orginally I thought it could be something in the way of the arms that each control arm is designed to be positioned around, but that'd be an engineering nightmare for Nissan needing two different shaped control arms 😅
    • ^ This. The mode door actuator is a common failure, as is the actuator and/or the actual valve for the coolant flow control valve. I also don't know how available the mode door actuator is these days. I've been meaning to look into it and get one from wherever is possible, to keep in the shed for the rainy day when mine eventually fails. Anyway, the advice to you is to search the usual NOS part supply places, or even just go to Nissan and see what they list.
    • Have you got a pic of the actuator? My guess is that unit has failed internally and was flopping around, so the previous engineer who owned it forced it to be fully open to cold air (blocking the heater core path). As far as you can tell, is anything else wrong in the system? Likely you just need a new actuator (not sure how available they are) and then "installation is the reverse of disassembly"
    • I'm happy with the Lsailt unit that I put in, it puts full Android on the top screen so you can run whatever Nav and other Apps you want, while still existing inside the factory functionality like automatic reverse cams, audio input switching, retains factory bluetooth etc. Not cheap and the install was moderate (not simple, not hard) Yours is a V36 not V37 though right?
    • Yeap, all the NC's that I originally looked at that had a hard top were PRHT, which makes the roof line look horrible, hence why I said nope to them My only caveat for another MX5 was it needed to have a hard top, and initially I didn't think you could get a detachable hard top for the NC,  like my NB had Again, a big thanks to Matty for helping me source the detachable hard top for my little girl, they are as rare as hens teeth in Australia, and the few people who have them, keep them Also to Greg, for initially pointing me in the NC direction NC PRHT 🤢🤮 Not mine (I really should take more photos of my car), but a NC with the detachable hard top 😁 To me, the difference in how the detachable hard top roof line looks, and how it actually follows the bodies lines, like they do on NA's and NB's, is chalk and cheese compared to the bulbous looking PRHT  
×
×
  • Create New...