Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

well i have decided that i want gtr injectors in my rb25! because my injectors is side fed and gtr is top fed, i just wanna know how i can go by putting them in!

would i have to modify my rail and how would i have to do it?

if there's anyone who has done it or have ideas on how to i would greatly appreciate it! or if anyone has a set of 6 s15 injectors i would gladly buy them off you!

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206763-gtr-injectors-in-rb25det/
Share on other sites

slidewize imports get some from japan

http://www.slidewizeimports.com/

since we cant get stuff from yahoo direct slidewize bids for us gets shipped to his Japan address and then on to us

>>Yahoo Injector Page<<

just calculated 400HP which is roughly 300Kw

so if you got 550cc you've got a little headroom for more power

Power: 400 horespower

Number of injectors: 6

BSFC: 0.65

Duty cycle: 0.85

This combination will require 535 cc/min injector (51.0 lbs/hour)

cheers guys! but i've decided to go for 200kw atw first so sticking to standard injectors would do the job! but in a few months time i will be getting my engine rebuilt! forgies, cams and maybe bore it to the max (2.6 litre) and a different turbo! but it's decided to go for 200 first =)

770 is a bit of overkill i think you only roughly need 450cc for 300kw

i am always thinking of room for expansion lol.....nothing wrong with 770cc injectors....

engine rebuilt and your only boring out a RB25 to a 2.6....correct me if i am wrong but i thought with RB25's you could bore it out to a bigger capacity to more like 2.8 or something....if i am correct why not do the 2.8 instead of the 2.6

yeah ^^ coz i think my mate had his RB20 bored out to something like a 2.3 or a 2.4l.....and i have also heard of RB26's being bored to 2.9-3.0l....so there is no reason in my mind as to why a RB25 cannot go to 2.8 or so...but i guess nos_man you will have to do a bit more research on that....ask you mechanics and see what they say or recommend....

2.7 is the most common set up for the 25 i believe running gtr crank n rods to do this...

anyone know if 25 injectors will fit in the 26 rail?

The 25 uses high impedance side feed injector where as the 26 uses low impedance top feeds. i know where you can get a top feed fuel rail made up for a 25 though.

Edited by D_stirls
The 25 uses high impedance side feed injector where as the 26 uses low impedance top feeds. i know where you can get a top feed fuel rail made up for a 25 though.

yer kool its just im looking at running a 26 plenum and throttle set up on a 25, so wasnt going to change to 26 inj because of the impedance :)

you can always use resistors! but i reckon it's not worth it! better off getting something like rx7(13b's are 550cc), s15 injectors if you're on a budget like i am! but i thought i would give it a shot but nah........

Edited by nos man

I ordered Deatschwerks 450cc injectors, was pretty cheap. Was going to get the 480cc items, cheaper than S15 ones, and they suggested to get their 480's but then said only stock was 550's...... so they gave me 550cc injectors for the 450cc price. pretty decent deal. Plus factor is that Deatschwerks are world renowned for their quality hi-flows.

If you are after some $$$-saving, contact them in the States and see what they can do for you.

lol;

Once again;

The 25 uses high impedance side feed injector where as the 26 uses low impedance top feeds.

So no they won't fit.

If you don't want to stuff around with resistor pack and such use injectors suitable for RB20's because they will be top feed so they will fit the RB26 rail and the will also be high impedance so you won't have to change anything in the wiring.

New Injectors- Perfect Run.com

Have a look at the link above, a set of Sard 650 or 800cc's (both the same price) will cost you ~ $610 delivered.

Edited by D_stirls

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...