Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys

I want to buy a set of Front Upper Camber arms ( adjustable) for my R32 gtst.

Just wondering who makes the best quality ones> ? I have seen cheap ones like , just jap and tuneagent for exampe and im looking for some better quality, seeing as there going on my track car.

Also I would like to know where to buy the better quaility ones from ?

cheers Tim.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206813-front-upper-camber-arms-r32/
Share on other sites

front_upper_arm_r32.jpg

these are my favorite, the noltecs are fine but these are horn and 1/4 of the weight and i can vouch for the quality of the rose joints.... but expect a hole in your wallet to the tune of 750.

yeah I got my noltec arms at unique auto sports too.

andrew, the ones trent posted are adjustable at all 4 joints. never tried them, but they certainly look different. :( they look like maybe Nagisa Auto (NAMS) arms to me.

Definitely not the JJR ones from just jap...they advertised it as giving +4/-4 degrees of adjustment which is BS...i got them and max i could get out of my car was -2 degrees camber in front...i spoke to just jap and they told me it was an advertising mistake...and that nothing could be done about it...absolute BS...

wouldnt happen to have some pics of the cusco ones??

or know where to get a set?

Rear Upper Arms here:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Fs...ml&hl=cusco

I also have a set of brand new Cusco FRONT Upper Arms (-5mm) available for $400

Located in Lane Cove, Sydney.

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...