Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've got an auto R33 gtst-series 1 that I got recently, and my fuel consumption is about 280-300 kms per full tank.

So from what I've read so far, changing the O2 sensor, plugs, might help. Also I didnt get what the ecu + remap + piggy back does and would it cost too much?

thanks

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

off the bat, just replace the O2 sensor (they're liek $80.00 new delivered from KUDOS), and give the AFM a clean with carby cleaner.. stock air box helps as well, and check for leaks.

nothing wrong with stock ecu if you don't plan to run many mods

If you have a PFC make sure the O2 sensor is turned on.

my tuner left mine off and was wondering why i would get 17-18L per 100km just cruising around.

It dropped down to 13L per 100 once on. hopefully get it a little lower once my tune is touched up today by a different tuner :cool:

Also I didnt get what the ecu + remap + piggy back does and would it cost too much?

If you have a number of mods it can cause the stock ecu to not be ideal for the modified setup. One thing is the ecu can go into rich and retard mode which means it adds extra fuel and takes out timing. This is more under power though but as you can see will worsen your fuel economy.

Custom tuning can also further optimise your afrs for better fuel consumption.

If you have a PFC make sure the O2 sensor is turned on.

my tuner left mine off and was wondering why i would get 17-18L per 100km just cruising around.

It dropped down to 13L per 100 once on. hopefully get it a little lower once my tune is touched up today by a different tuner :cool:

provided it works!

mines permantly disabled and I cruise at 14.7 a/f usually get up to 400km city per tank of enthusiastic driving at 1.3bar

but saying that, he runs a stock ECU

  • 2 months later...
  • 1 year later...

ah you want to know the secret to getting more Ks from a tank eh?.... I dunno guys should we tell him...

I know it an old thead but I have the secret

How do you all drive your car? It must be Full no, off, Full on, off

LOL funny

I must have the secret, here it is

Buy a hr31 two 2 door skyline. Put in it a RB25det neo in it then a rb26 gearbox and a chrome-moly flywheel, brass button clutch, bosch 040 fuel pump , adjustable fuel regulator , Apex bov, Turbosmart boost controller, Big front mount intercooler, plenum and 68mm XF body, hks cams,Oil cooler and oil filter relocation, micro tech LT-12, TO4 Turbo 69hks inlet wheel and 0.7 housing exhaust , Tial wast gate, 10l sump (for Oil), head std kit (ARP), mean std kit(ARP), commadik head gasket, gates timing balt, N1 oil pump.

and made 350rhp ish on 12psi on pits dyno and If you drive it like a normal person and you get 550ish + out of a tank. Drive like a wanker and you get about 300ish.

WIN WIN WIN ON FUEL

post-64661-0-56502200-1309183769_thumb.jpg

Just switched back to 98 after 18 months or so on E85. (Around 240rwkw)

So far on the first tank i'm up to 320km and about 1/8 of a tank left. There has been very little cruise going on. I would say 80% of the driving has been foot to the floor (very little O2 use).

Very surprised at the economy. I would love to take it for a long country drive to see what is possible but it's too much fun on boost :)

Jimmy

Hey, that's funny. I was just about to head out and buy hr31 two 2 door skyline. Put in it a RB25det neo in it then a rb26 gearbox and a chrome-moly flywheel, brass button clutch, bosch 040 fuel pump , adjustable fuel regulator , Apex bov, Turbosmart boost controller, Big front mount intercooler, plenum and 68mm XF body, hks cams,Oil cooler and oil filter relocation, micro tech LT-12, TO4 Turbo 69hks inlet wheel and 0.7 housing exhaust , Tial wast gate, 10l sump (for Oil), head std kit (ARP), mean std kit(ARP), commadik head gasket, gates timing balt, N1 oil pump.

Hoping to make 350rhp ish on 12psi on pits dyno and If you drive it like a normal person and you get 550ish + out of a tank. Drive like a wanker and you get about 300ish.

i'm a bit out of my legue here but i own a 98 nissan s2 stagea rs4

many problems with fuel economy

albeit many people here have big problems with their setups but i found the best fuel saving device was a boost guage

under vaccume the map uses the o2 sensor and leans out the engine, boost means the ecu runs a default map which is typically rich

in summary when you hear that boost whistle it sounds like this $$$$HHH

keep of boost and you are saving a bundle

Lowest i've seen out of the DE+T is 9.1L/100km. Easy highway driving, with the occasional WOT 3rd/4rd/5th coming into a 100 zone. Fresh plugs, coils, fuel filter, pump, 02 sensor, clean AFM, good oil and good maintenance helps the figure.

State of tune helps also. Plugs, coils, ECU and it's relevant sensors (o2, MAF), low fuel pressure, big tyres, poor alignment, carrying excess weight etc. etc. will all affect economy. Driving style will be a MAJOR factor over all others though...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...