Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

RWD envy, TJ? :geek:

Live and let live, or live and let hit a pole because I need some new interior plastics and his wreck sounds perfect!

nah no envy. . . . . . . . well maybe a little , but still a dick none the less.

oh by the way he's going wont be long, come flying out of no where across 3 lans nearly doing a 180 then slide out the other way, full car mind you. Damn fool!

RWD envy, TJ? :geek:

Live and let live, or live and let hit a pole because I need some new interior plastics and his wreck sounds perfect!

I don't agree with you there Matt :) If its the same guy that rocked up to the meet earlier, then he's a f*cking nob. 4 friends in the car, plenty of innocent people around and he was acting like a complete dickhead. I was behind (luckily) and watched him flick it sideways for a good couple of hundred metres with a car next to him.

I don't agree with you there Matt :geek: If its the same guy that rocked up to the meet earlier, then he's a f*cking nob. 4 friends in the car, plenty of innocent people around and he was acting like a complete dickhead. I was behind (luckily) and watched him flick it sideways for a good couple of hundred metres with a car next to him.

yeah i watched it all in my rearview mirror. sounds bad but hope he smash's into a tree, better a tree then another car.

click the last link of my sig, fool doesn't deserve to have a car

anyone here go to holmesglen chadstone...i see lots of lines in the carpark....anyone from here =]

also keeping seeing blk 33 gts with black rims in the carpark. man i love your style =]

could also be people at fitness first, same car park

also spotted redline at aqualink gym =]

haha yeah. I just moved house 2 months ago so im in balwyn now. Nice to see a few nice skylines around the area.

Ill come say hi if i see you in nandos anytime :D

yeah do. im always out the front eating chips with the car parked right out the front.. i get really antzy when i cant see the car from where i am. hence why ill do 6 laps of burke rd to avoid parking in the back carpark.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...