Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Marks laps in the video looked very clean indeed!... I would say that comparing the S2000 v the GTR lap, the GTR was the one that had less drama about it... throttle application was smooth, and tended to be only 1 go at it...

what was the lap time difference between the 32 v 35 and say the S2000???

JB's driving style certainly is exciting to watch!!! butI'm not so sure on it bringing the fastest lap time.

there's a common misconception going around that to be fast you have to be smooth. This really only applies to cars with lots of aerodymanic grip. If you are running around perfectly smooth in a prod car even on semi slicks, you are loosing a bit of time. You only need to look back to any production based racing (Group A, Group C, or current Improved Production etc) and you will always see that the fast guys are running right on the edge like Boz in the S2000. Particularly when you are going for the fastest possible single lap from the car - like in qualy or in this case at Superlap. Its only when it gets 'too' sideways that its slower than being smooth.

no idea on the silver one, but the grey one is matt's. top bloke and he did very well considering it was only his second time at oran park too. it runs all the good gear. dry sump, PPG dog box etc etc. very nice car. with the scavange from the head it doesn't breathe at all. i mean nothing. it doesn't have any pipes fitted to the cam covers and not a drop to be seen anywhere in the engine bay. for quick GTRs dry sump is the way to go it seems.

actually, now I remember. the silver one was dry sump too. and it had a weird screen made of particle board, and all these ducts and fans and vents in the boot. some of it looked a bit nautical! should slap that into johns car.

hmm I'm no mechanic but do healthy engines breathe 1l/lap? Is it due for new rings soon or does it just have big clearances?

Didn't you read the post you deleted?

This is a brand new mega-buck engine built by another workshop located in Sydney. I wanted to build it but Dave believed he could get a good product as the workshop in question had employed a good engine builder. The car had a built engine of unknown origin in it when it cried 'enough' on their dyno. Dave decided it best to leave it in Sydney and let them take care of it. Clearances are unknown but since the thing was running so rich on run-in it may have had a ring sealing-bedding in issue from the get go. It has always blown oil smoke since the day he picked it up which is something that has always concerned me. Dave now realises his decision to leave the car in Sydney was a mistake that has cost him a lot of time and money. He now wants me to pull it down and inspect it.

Not throwing mud here...just stating facts. If this post breaks forum rules please delete.

gtrjason what style of breather system do you run, any help is always welcome.

Edited by DiRTgarage

You GTR guys make me laugh. Dry Sumps, breather systems nail ppolish removers. Sheesh, i read everywhere they are king of the track. Just man up, throw bigger turbo on it, more boost and use a Gatorade bottle (i am a proud Aussie so i use Powerade) as a catch can. If the thing breathes then throw the 26 to the shitter and put a 20 in it. Nissan build a perfectly good, strong reliable track engine in the 20 :)

Hey guys Paul isnt stirring crap he has just stated the the facts as to what happened over ther superlap weekend. My car did have a lot of blowby after 2 laps we didnt even get a good lap in really as tyres wearnt even warm but we still managed a 1.18 considering the dramas we had with the catch can filling up so quick. The engine was built by a very respected engine builder he is very carefull with the way he builds his engines checks everything twice plus is clean with the way he does things. Paul has been a great help to me in the past as well as the present he has just been looking out for me & the GTR as he does no hes shit Its his second nature the GTR. One other thing the car never has blowby on the street or on the dyno so god only knows. So me paul wouldnt mind stripping it down to see if everything is ok. Last tuesday would of had at least a 1ltr of oil in the intercooler & some in plenum chamber its all clean now thou & guess what no blowby all week.

hehehe, the Poms wont knwo what hit them. http://www.timeattack.co.uk/latest%20news.html

Buy AUS$6000 shitter R32, gut it whilst downing some Carlings, throw on some semis then wreak havoc. FARK YEH!!!! :)

Any chance of any Australian businesses wanting to sponsor me in the UK series :P

You GTR guys make me laugh. Dry Sumps, breather systems nail ppolish removers. Sheesh, i read everywhere they are king of the track. Just man up, throw bigger turbo on it, more boost and use a Gatorade bottle (i am a proud Aussie so i use Powerade) as a catch can. If the thing breathes then throw the 26 to the shitter and put a 20 in it. Nissan build a perfectly good, strong reliable track engine in the 20 :)

How is Powerade more Aussie than Gatorade?

actually, now I remember. the silver one was dry sump too. and it had a weird screen made of particle board, and all these ducts and fans and vents in the boot. some of it looked a bit nautical! should slap that into johns car.

yee thats the one, had some air duct tube in the boot and sectioned off with partical board.

haha why i am waiting waiting and waiting some more i keep getting ideas... and i cant buy engine parts because i got no idea what size the bore is!!

Hey guys Paul isnt stirring crap he has just stated the the facts as to what happened over ther superlap weekend. My car did have a lot of blowby after 2 laps we didnt even get a good lap in really as tyres wearnt even warm but we still managed a 1.18 considering the dramas we had with the catch can filling up so quick. The engine was built by a very respected engine builder he is very carefull with the way he builds his engines checks everything twice plus is clean with the way he does things. Paul has been a great help to me in the past as well as the present he has just been looking out for me & the GTR as he does no hes shit Its his second nature the GTR. One other thing the car never has blowby on the street or on the dyno so god only knows. So me paul wouldnt mind stripping it down to see if everything is ok. Last tuesday would of had at least a 1ltr of oil in the intercooler & some in plenum chamber its all clean now thou & guess what no blowby all week.

yeah that's fair enough. plenty of GTR will experience some blow by under track conditions as it's a long way from street use/drag use/dyno. it probably just needs some smart catch can work and maybe an external oil return if it doesn't have one. 1:18 is fairly moving so it's doing pretty well for a road car. :)

Paul,as you didnt build it i know its a hard question to answer but could it be something stupid like the restricters werent fitted and its pumping the valve covers up? its the only thing i can think of other than an internal problem causing massive crankcase pressure which can only be a ring issue. incorrect ring gap or broken ring....but at the end of the day, shouldnt this highly experienced engine builder be looking at rectifying the issue?

"You cannot be seruious!" :)
Edited by BezerkR32
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...