Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just saw an article on Whiteline's kit for the Dugong ie latest model WRX, including fairly straightforward underbody chassis bracing. Despite the fact that there's probably a good market, I suspect it will be quite some time before they produce similar for Skylines, if ever, unless Sydneykid can convince them otherwise.

The R32 GTR could do with a bit of stiffening and most of us are using front and rear strut braces. The only other thing I've seen around is the Do Luck brace that goes across the tunnel and bolts to the inner sills but I'm not sure it does much. Of course a cage would do the trick but it's illegal for road use. The R33 GTR has a big panel between the rear shock towers that seems to keep both of them moving in the same direction quite well, and the R34 GTR improves on this again.

There is a lot of stuff in Japan - various brackets etc but I'm not sure of their effectiveness. Last thing I want to do is add 10 kg of weight for no improvement in rigidity.

Has anyone got experience with Japanese stuff or their own, that actually works?

Cheers

Edited by Scooby
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/211975-chassis-bracing-components/
Share on other sites

Kansai service centre sell a whole packaged of underbody braces/brackets for the R32 GTR. I have no idea if they work or not though.

http://www.hkskansai.co.jp/html/parts/roa/roa.htm

Unlike the Wrecks, Skylines have good suspension pick up point rigidity, which should not be confused with general chassis rigidity. Obviously in the areas of general chassis rigidity R33's are an improvement over R32's and R34's are even more rigid. What is perhaps not so obvious is that series within those model changes have chassis rigidity improvements. Mostly as a result of mandated improvements in occupant safety. Hence an R32 S2 (post 1990) is more rigid than an R32 S1 (1989/90).

I can say without exception that I have yet to see any bracing that I would consider worthwhile. Simply put, they all fail the triangulation test.

Cheers

Gary

I've got a Nismo (at least I thought it was Nismo) full underbody brace kit installed on my R32 GTR... freakin' solid and massive amounts of "feeling" through the wheel with exactly what the car is doing...

I know I am asking a lot here...but any chance you could post up a pic of the one you got fitted ??...

Unlike the Wrecks, Skylines have good suspension pick up point rigidity, which should not be confused with general chassis rigidity. Obviously in the areas of general chassis rigidity R33's are an improvement over R32's and R34's are even more rigid. What is perhaps not so obvious is that series within those model changes have chassis rigidity improvements. Mostly as a result of mandated improvements in occupant safety. Hence an R32 S2 (post 1990) is more rigid than an R32 S1 (1989/90).

I can say without exception that I have yet to see any bracing that I would consider worthwhile. Simply put, they all fail the triangulation test.

Cheers

Gary

Hi Gary

so...you're going to start making the good stuff for us? :D or are there reasons why it's simply not production feasible? also is it feasible at all or are there fitment / design issues that make it impractical to pursue rigidity improvements unless it's a full cage ?

Cheers

Edited by Scooby
I've got a Nismo (at least I thought it was Nismo) full underbody brace kit installed on my R32 GTR... freakin' solid and massive amounts of "feeling" through the wheel with exactly what the car is doing...

I am not a big fan of seat of the pants judgement, the placebo effect is strong in car modifications. In a pure technical sense I have yet to see a value for money result as far as improving torsional rigidity goes. The testing is actually quite simple, a basic home garage test of rigidity. Stick the car on 4 stands, under the sills is OK. Then jack one corner of the car up 100 mm and see how much the other corners move. I do that 4 times, once for each corner. Now bolt on any number of underfloor, in cabin, under bonnet and in boot braces. Then repeat the test. Note any differences. An example, my own R32GTST before and after the 6 point roll cage fitment across the chassis.

LHR 100 mm - RHR 87 mm before, 93 mm after

RHR 100 mm - LHR 86 mm before, 92 mm after

LHF 100 mm - RHF 91 mm before, 95 mm after

RHF 100 mm - RHF 90 mm before, 94 mm after

That's obviously the across, you can also do along, put the jack in the middle, again under the sill and measure;

Centre LH 100 mm - LHF 90 mm before, 95 mm after

Centre RH 100 mm - RHF 91 mm before, 96 mm after

Centre LH 100 mm - LHR 90 mm before, 94 mm after

Centre RH 100 mm - RHR 91 mm before, 97 mm after

This is not an absolute test as the chassis walks on the stands, it is a comparison test only. So when you do it yourself don't get hung up on the numbers themselves, the difference (improvement) is all that matters.

The other test is corner weights, how many mm of adjustment of the spring seat on one corner alters how much weight on that corner. A soft (flexible) chassis means more turns to achieve the same weight transfer as a rigid (inflexible) chassis. That is a more reliable real world test as it is the wheels that move up and down and that is what is passed though the chassis. That's how we tell when a V8Supercar chassis is due for replacement, it gets lazy in its response to changes, hence why a new chassis is built each season. Usually around Bathurst time as long distance events show up any lack of rigidity.

Cheers

Gary

Unlike the Wrecks, Skylines have good suspension pick up point rigidity, which should not be confused with general chassis rigidity. Obviously in the areas of general chassis rigidity R33's are an improvement over R32's and R34's are even more rigid. What is perhaps not so obvious is that series within those model changes have chassis rigidity improvements. Mostly as a result of mandated improvements in occupant safety. Hence an R32 S2 (post 1990) is more rigid than an R32 S1 (1989/90).

I can say without exception that I have yet to see any bracing that I would consider worthwhile. Simply put, they all fail the triangulation test.

Cheers

Gary

I would have to argue that... true that it is ideal to have a 3 point brace for that brace to be as rigid as possible however you are not after multi directional rigidity in a lot of situations. For instance the plain old strut brace works wonders and is a 2 point brace (in most cases anyway). It works fine because its job is to tie 2 points together and stop the distances between those two points getting greater or smaller hence preventing suspension geometry change through chassis flex...

same would apply underneath the car for chassis flex as I would imagine that when the car goes over a ripple strip or just leans hard under heavy cornering on one side that the chassis would have a tendency to flex in the middle. By tying the 2 chassis rails together with a brace (or 3) you would help prevent this flex...

I would have to argue that... true that it is ideal to have a 3 point brace for that brace to be as rigid as possible however you are not after multi directional rigidity in a lot of situations. For instance the plain old strut brace works wonders and is a 2 point brace (in most cases anyway). It works fine because its job is to tie 2 points together and stop the distances between those two points getting greater or smaller hence preventing suspension geometry change through chassis flex...

same would apply underneath the car for chassis flex as I would imagine that when the car goes over a ripple strip or just leans hard under heavy cornering on one side that the chassis would have a tendency to flex in the middle. By tying the 2 chassis rails together with a brace (or 3) you would help prevent this flex...

Not really. the car can still twist the same as ever.

Front strut braces are ok as it ties a point thats close to the inner upper control arm to another point close to the inner of the other upper control arm. so yes, they are good at effectively boxing that section of the car and yes, it improves it. The same can be said for the rear to a lesser extent, as the upper contol arm mounts to the subframe so bracing the strut tops has less effect. The load of the rear struts is almost all vertical, only minimal horizontal. They don't move towards each other or away from each other to any great extent anyway, the main concern is the vertical loading. Whats bracing against that if you have a strut brace running horizontally?

And again, whats stopping the front end of the car twisting one way while the back twists the other? It's effectively a torsional force so bracing two rails together to form a ladder is doing 2/5ths of f*&k all to brace against it.

And again, whats stopping the front end of the car twisting one way while the back twists the other? It's effectively a torsional force so bracing two rails together to form a ladder is doing 2/5ths of f*&k all to brace against it.

that seems to be the downfall with underbody braces - they don't have anything that braces across the chassis effectively in the direction of the force. i'm not sure how you could achieve that without having height in at least one domension of the brace with the other dimension being across the chassis, such as the panel at the rear of the R33 GTR. the underbody stuff would help if the problem was with the front meeting the rear in a horizontal plane, but its not.

pics please paul! I need ideas for how to get the cage to the strut towers while still keeping the booster

bit hard to get a decent pic...but these will give you an idea.

NOTE...these are nothing like the AutoSelect ones...the jap ones are much beefier with cross bracing as well. But display's the general idea.

post-23582-1206611835_thumb.jpg

Would pop riveting inside the engine bay to the door sills be any good? i know disadvantage is the little extra weight of the rivets. Thats how my car came from japan and it also have similar to what dirtgarage but does extend as far, by AS.

Probably getting more spot welds would be better than riveting.

post-24749-1206617030_thumb.jpg

post-24749-1206617078_thumb.jpg

bit hard to get a decent pic...but these will give you an idea.

NOTE...these are nothing like the AutoSelect ones...the jap ones are much beefier with cross bracing as well. But display's the general idea.

I have seen that bracket used as the mount for the front on board jacking system.

Cheers

Gary

Would pop riveting inside the engine bay to the door sills be any good? i know disadvantage is the little extra weight of the rivets. Thats how my car came from japan and it also have similar to what dirtgarage but does extend as far, by AS.

Probably getting more spot welds would be better than riveting.

Rivets work loose, not a good idea. Extra spot welds or stitch MIG/TIG welding is a far superior solution.

Cheers

Gary

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From there, it is really just test and assemble. Plug the adapter cables from the unit into the back of the screen, then the other side to the car harness. Don't forget all the other plugs too! Run the cables behind the unit and screw it back into place (4 screws) and you should now have 3 cables to run from the top screen to the android unit. I ran them along the DS of the other AV units in the gap between their backets and the console, and used some corrugated tubing on the sharp edges of the bracket so the wires were safe. Plug the centre console and lower screen in temporarily and turn the car to ACC, the AV should fire up as normal. Hold the back button for 3 sec and Android should appear on the top screen. You need to set the input to Aux for audio (more on that later). I put the unit under the AC duct in the centre console, with the wifi antenna on top of the AC duct near the shifter, the bluetooth antenna on the AC duct under the centre console The GPS unit on top of the DS to AC duct; they all seem to work OK there are are out of the way. Neat cable routing is a pain. For the drive recorder I mounted it near the rear view mirror and run the cable in the headlining, across the a pillar and then down the inside of the a pillar seal to the DS lower dash. From there it goes across and to one USB input for the unit. The second USB input is attached to the ECUtec OBD dongle and the 3rd goes to the USB bulkhead connected I added in the centre console. This is how the centre console looks "tidied" up Note I didn't install the provided speaker, didn't use the 2.5mm IPod in line or the piggyback loom for the Ipod or change any DIP switches; they seem to only be required if you need to use the Ipod input rather than the AUX input. That's it, install done, I'll follow up with a separate post on how the unit works, but in summary it retains all factory functions and inputs (so I still use my phone to the car for calls), reverse still works like factory etc.
    • Place the new daughterboard in the case and mount it using the 3 small black rivets provided, and reconnect the 3 factory ribbon cables to the new board Then, use the 3 piggyback cables from the daughterboard into the factory board on top (there are stand offs in the case to keep them apart. and remember to reconnect the antenna and rear cover fan wires. 1 screw to hold the motherboard in place. Before closing the case, make a hole in the sticker covering a hole in the case and run the cable for the android unit into the plug there. The video forgot this step, so did I, so will you probably. Then redo the 4 screws on back, 2 each top and bottom, 3 each side and put the 2 brackets back on.....all ready to go and not that tricky really.      
    • Onto the android unit. You need to remove the top screen because there is a daughterboard to put inside the case. Each side vent pops out from clips; start at the bottom and carefully remove upwards (use a trim remover tool to avoid breaking anything). Then the lower screen and controls come out, 4 screws, a couple of clips (including 3 flimsy ones at the top) and 3 plugs on the rear. Then the upper screen, 4 screws and a bunch of plugs and she is out. From there, remove the mounting brackets (2 screws each), 4 screws on the rear, 2 screws top and bottom and 3 screws holding in the small plates on each side. When you remove the back cover (tight fit), watch out for the power cable for the fan, I removed it so I could put the back aside. The mainboard is held in by 1 screw in the middle, 1 aerial at the top and 3 ribbon cables. If you've ever done any laptop stuff the ribbon cables are OK to work with, just pop up the retainer and they slide out. If you are not familiar just grab a 12 year old from an iphone factory, they will know how it works The case should now look like this:
    • Switching the console was tricky. First there were 6 screws to remove, and also the little adapter loom and its screws had to come out. Also don't forget to remove the 2 screws holding the central locking receiver. Then there are 4 clips on either side....these were very tight in this case and needed careful persuading with a long flat screw driver....some force required but not enough to break them...this was probably the fiddliest part of the whole job. In my case I needed both the wiring loom and the central locking receiver module to swap across to the new one. That was it for the console, so "assembly is the reverse of disassembly"
    • But first....while I was there, I also swapped across the centre console box for the other style where the AV inputs don't intrude into the (very limited !) space.  Part# was 96926-4GA0A, 284H3-4GA0B, 284H3-4GA0A. (I've already swapped the top 12v socket for a USB bulkhead in this pic, it fit the hole without modification:) Comparison of the 2: Basically to do the console you need to remove the DS and PS side console trim (they slide up and back, held in by clips only) Then remove the back half of the console top trim with the cupholders, pops up, all clips again but be careful at the front as it is pretty flimsy. Then slide the shifter boot down, remove the spring clip, loose it forever somewhere in the car the pull the shift knob off. Remove the tiny plastic piece on DS near "P" and use something thin and long (most screwdrivers won't fit) to push down the interlock and put the shifter down in D for space. There is one screw at the front, then the shifter surround and ashtray lift up. There are 3 or 4 plugs underneath and it is off. Next is the rear cover of the centre console; you need to open the console lid, pop off the trim covering the lid hinge and undo the 2rd screw from the driver's side (the rest all need to come out later so you can do them all now and remove the lid) Then the rear cover unclips (6 clips), start at the top with a trim tool pulling backwards. Once it is off there are 2 screws facing rearwards to remove (need a short phillips for these) and you are done with the rear of the console. There are 4 plugs at the A/V box to unclip Then there are 2 screws at the front of the console, and 2 clips (pull up and back) and the console will come out.
×
×
  • Create New...