Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 183
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Marty..

Battle 3 .. its Black STi vs Blue WRX (Not Black WRX) :)

Daz is kicking Brentons ass there not mine :laugh:

I am pretty sure i get my ass kicked by a girl in that round :banana:

Pete

Pete sorry about that was late I was drunk....

fixed now tho

Leewah...Deal with it :banana:

in the battle 2 vids of prpl 33 GTR vs 300zx, someone behind the camera goes "i never knew a slow car could do that"... haha thanks :D also i never realised that my na zed is loud enough to drown out a gtr from the other side of the skidpan hehe. nice vids btw Martin :P

i'll definately come up to watch/help out at deca masters... will be an awesome event and it's always good to watch the faster cars. hopefully uni exams are over before november 15th deca so i can have another go.

yeah paul said the same thing, it's nothing serious though which is why i kept driving. it's because the zed has pcv pickups on the passenger side cam cover so on hard right hand turns it picks up too much oil and it gets sucked into the plenum and smokes like a chimney... same thing happened at deca last feb but it was worse because the long wang was clockwise last time. not the best look when your driving around blowing smoke but my engine is actually very healthy compression-wise and doesn't burn a drop around town. i'm gonna change the pickups so that they're on the middle 2 cam covers when i get some time off uni and that will stop it from smoking next time :P

Your car was also blowing some pretty severe smoke in the arvo battles, in case ya dont already know... everytime you were on the opposite start block to me so i couldnt tell ya as you were driving off :D

Hanging around DECA threads a bit late at night aren't you Daz?

Wouldn't be waiting for the results by any chance would you?

Might just let you wait a little longer....... They are finished, but I need to confirm one result with Snowy in the morning and then I will post them up.

Hanging around DECA threads a bit late at night aren't you Daz?

Wouldn't be waiting for the results by any chance would you?

Might just let you wait a little longer....... They are finished, but I need to confirm one result with Snowy in the morning and then I will post them up.

Yep I beat you all morning :P

Hanging around DECA threads a bit late at night aren't you Daz?

Wouldn't be waiting for the results by any chance would you?

Might just let you wait a little longer....... They are finished, but I need to confirm one result with Snowy in the morning and then I will post them up.

Haha! :P

I saw a cone hit & a tonne of tyre smoke when he missed a chicaine!

That's a WD as the timing won't be accurate! :(

I'm going to fight for this one! :P

The one technical issue with your fight Daz is that the lock-up/missed chicane was on the 80% non-timed practise run :P

The good news is I did have 2 other stuff ups during the day so I'm no threat to winning the day anyways.

OK here are the results....

Click Here

Well done to all.

Stand outs for me are:

Daz - Good times all day without one mistake.

Ryan - Let someone else win RWD.

Chris Stacey - Great results for a first time.

Russell - Some great times

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...