Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 895
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If the price is about $2k i wouldnt hold too many in stock as the benefits for the average skyline owner wont justify the price increase over pfc

again...this ECU is not suited to everyone....but think about this...

how many people spend $800+ on camshaft upgrades that have a minimal effect on performance...a lot!

wait until we do some back to back testing and publish some results...i think they will have a place in the aussie skyline performance market.

Feature list sounds suspiciously like a great aussie ecu I know, price too.

If it is the same ecu, I've seen nothing but good results with these, but as always its the tuner that makes the most of it(or not) in the end.

Edited by infamous_t
think about it...sell Power FC, AFM's and boost controller and upgrade costs next to nothing

well.. apart from the new intake pipes and re-tune, yeh.

I guess for those looking at MOTEC level of capabilities, it's a bargain.

for the masses of 12 second 250rwkw skyrines, it's not worth the extra dollars over a PFC.

when i think about it...

PFC $1300

Gizzmo Launch Controll $400 (second hand its 700 new)

Q45 AFM $180

Boost Controll Kit $350

I i will have $200 left over from selling all my stuff and buying this ECU.

ANother Thought...High and Low Impedence Injectors?

This Is Sounding Very Tempting...Although I have to get my car driving again before id think about this....Was going to Go an E11v2.

Waiting to how many see in/out puts this one has as I wanna run water Injection, thermos etc

Would be awsome to have water inj triggered by intake temp.

ANother Thought...High and Low Impedence Injectors?

This Is Sounding Very Tempting...Although I have to get my car driving again before id think about this....Was going to Go an E11v2.

Waiting to how many see in/out puts this one has as I wanna run water Injection, thermos etc

Would be awsome to have water inj triggered by intake temp.

injectors can be selected from a table by part no. (denso ********) or brand (Blitz 1000cc) very easy...high and low imped.

water inj. triggered by intake temp. not a drama...switching on and off thermo's...just as easy

Edited by DiRTgarage

The following info might answer a few questions and clear a few things up for people.....

The V44 standalone has 4 injector and 4 ignition outputs. The plug-in ECU based on the V44 have six injector and six ignition outputs. The V88 model has 8 injector and 8 ignition outputs. Also it has knock control and DBW throttle control. Both ECU have motorsport features like antilag, WOT shift, launch control.

These ECU use a 32 bit microcontroller running at 42Mhz. This processor is designed for engine control and has the power and speed to work with crank and cam trigger signals in real time. It does not use the time based system like the Autronic. The result is far more stable ignition and injector control. On engines with multitooth crank triggers the ECU reads and uses every signal for maximum resolution.

Some of the features are,

Missing tooth engines can run wasted spark without a sync signal.

User can set reluctor input signal threshold. (this lets you tune out any interference)

Variable cam control for up to four cams. (V88 only)

Outputs can be controlled by GPC tables or PID with feedback.

ECU case is extruded with water proof connectors. Case is small and not box shaped (looks very good).

V44 has one connector and the V88 has two connectors.

Idle control is very very good and very easy to setup.

No popping in the exhaust on overrun with smooth transition in and out of over run

Fixed duty boost control.

Different boost in each gear.

Dual fuel and Ignition tables that can be externally switched.

Up to 12 cylinder multi coil engine support

DBW throttle control (V88)

QuickTune (Autotune) feature on both V44 and V88.

Inputs and Outputs:

V44 injector = 4

V44 ignition = 4

V44 analog inputs = 3/4*

V44 temp inputs = 2

V44 digital inputs = 3/4*

V44 AUX outputs =8

V44 Connector pin number = 34 (one connecter)

*one Digital input shares the same pin as one analogue input

V88 injector = 8

V88 ignition = 8

V88 analog inputs = 11

V88 temp inputs = 4

V88 digital inputs = 10

V88 AUX outputs = 10

V88 Knock input = 2

V88 Connectors pin number = 2 x 34 (two connecter)

V88 has:

- E-Throttle (drive by wire throttle)

- Peak & Hold (individual P&H current control)

- Dual Knock

- 4MB of logging memory

Both ECU's have:

- 8V out

- 5V out

- Trigger in = 2

- USB Coms connector

- Can Bus Coms connector

- All spare injection and ignition channels can be auxiliary outputs

Trigger support for the following patterns:

All Mitsubishi 4 and 6 cylinder.

All Subaru 4 and 6 cylinder

All Nissan optical

BMW S50

Buick 3.8L

Ford TFi 4, 6 and 8 cylinder

Ford 36-1

Ford Cosworth RS500

GM LS1

GM LS7

GM LT1

Honda K20

Honda S2000

Honda V6

Motronic 60-2

MX5

Porsche 944

RX7

Suzuki Baleno

Toyota 36-2

Toyota 2NZ VVTi

Toyota 1ZZ VVTi

Toyota 3SGTE VVTi

Toyota 1UZ VVTi

Toyota 1JZ-GTE and 2JZ-GTE

Toyota 1JZ-GTE VVTi

Toyota 2JZ-GTE VVTi

Other patterns can be added quickly with the correct information supplied.

Plug-in ECU:

Subaru 1994-96 (V44)

Subaru 1997-98 (V44)

Subaru 1999-00 (V44)

Subaru 2001-05 2L (V44)

Subaru 2005-2007 2.5L (V88 with DBW)

Mitsubishi EVO 1 to 6 (V44)

Mitsubishi EVO 7 to 8 (V44)

Mitsubishi EVO 9 (V88)

Nissan N14 (V44)

Nissan S13 (V44)

Nissan S14 (V44)

Nissan S15 (V44)

Nissan GTiR (V44)

Nissan GT-R (R32-R34) (V88)

Nissan GTS (R32-R33) (V88)

Mazda MX5 1.6L (V44)

Mazda MX5 1.8L (V44)

Mazda 323 GTX (V44)

Mazda RX7 (V44)

Toyota MR2 SW20 (V44)

Toyota Celica ST185 (V44)

Toyota Celica ST205 (V44)

As you can see this is quite an extensive product and very well engineered and produced. It is far superior than the Autronic in a few features especially over-run control. Personally im itching to get it in the car and try it.

Edited by DiRTgarage

Depends how nuts you want to go, the bikirom daughterboard (running version 3 software) is more than good enough in the R34, especially for the price. You've got full access via USB to most of the maps you'd want to frig with. The only thing V3 is missing is real-time upload, but that's been sorted with V4 anyway...so bit of a moot point.

So easy to tune now it's sickening, shame it was like this out of the box 2 years ago, took time to develop I suppose.

Depends how nuts you want to go, the bikirom daughterboard (running version 3 software) is more than good enough in the R34, especially for the price. You've got full access via USB to most of the maps you'd want to frig with. The only thing V3 is missing is real-time upload, but that's been sorted with V4 anyway...so bit of a moot point.

So easy to tune now it's sickening, shame it was like this out of the box 2 years ago, took time to develop I suppose.

Yeah, but they wanted to make sure when it hit the market it hit the ground running...

having the thing not up to scratch would have given the product a bad name from the get-go and something that would have been hard to shake.

The thing is constantly under development and even last week underwent quite a number of needed changes after tuner feedback.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't know if you can disassemble the thing and put it backwards for different ramp rates. They're both "2 ways" or both "1.5 ways" because well, 2 ways and 1.5 ways are the same 'thing' I do not know for sure, but I believe the 38420-RSS15-B5 is the 1 way, and 38420-RSS20-B5 is the two way. In other words, I predict Nissan considers this: to be a 1.5 way. No idea what actually happens when it arrives/you disassemble it. It would be an excellent question to ask Nismo directly! I somehow doubt you will get an answer though, I feel you would be the first person to document what you encounter when you open the box and the internet would be grateful.
    • I'm going to slap an old nismo logo sticker on my spare one and sell it to the land of the free for a thousand bucks
    • lol, probably should have read further!
    • Well - they have arrived.  And they are easy on the eye to put it mildly... These only have three bolts - but for a start there is a key that fits with vacuum like precision..  And as you can see by my ruler, the interface is large..   I listened to a podcast on HP Academy about Dan (KiwiCNC) and I'm more than comfortable he knows what he is doing. R35 Bearing assembly should arrive later today so can mock that up for a look. Can't wait to get these on and get some brake pressure logging too. IMG_3860.MP4
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
×
×
  • Create New...