Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well he most likely will get charged at that speed, and "charge" means you will have a record on your profile. In my experience of applying for jobs and also from my friends experience in applying for uni graduate jobs, the application form asks whether you have been charged for anything or have been taken to court. Now the paper ive read didn't have any space for explanation besides the Yes/No question. Probably is different for every job. :P

*sigh. yes mate forms will just ask you yes or no. if you write yes, but your application was otherwise suitable they will ask you about the incident and ask you to provide character references. and they will always do recrods check so they will know the nature of the offence anyway.

  • Replies 141
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Why does everyone act so innocent on the internet? I mean I'm sure most of you (as in car enthusiasts) at some stage in your life have put the foot down on a long stretch of straight road just to see what she will do? Only difference is you didnt get caught.

I own bikes and I dont know a single rider that hasnt hit some insane speed at least once just for the fun of it - higher than that speed mentioned too.

I dont agree with what this guy did and I hardly want to encourage such behaviour as I can only imagine what would happen if something went wrong, but you know the saying - people who live in glass houses shouldnt throw stones...

I havent seen anyone say "I've never done something this stupid"...

The vast majority have done a silly speed at some point. Im sure that nearly everyone who is calling this guy an idiot wouldnt do something so stupid now - thats not saying that they havent ever done something so stupid before. People grow up!

Why does everyone act so innocent on the internet? I mean I'm sure most of you (as in car enthusiasts) at some stage in your life have put the foot down on a long stretch of straight road just to see what she will do? Only difference is you didnt get caught.

Hmmm, Well mate maybe because this forum is not a confesion box and also to your suprise most of us here on this forum does not "put the foot down" to see what she does we leave that for the track. I get young blokes pull next to all the time or chase me down to jump on front of me but I just politely ignore that or if they say something I reply "Your to fast for me".

Dave :P

Why does everyone act so innocent on the internet? I mean I'm sure most of you (as in car enthusiasts) at some stage in your life have put the foot down on a long stretch of straight road just to see what she will do? Only difference is you didnt get caught.

I own bikes and I dont know a single rider that hasnt hit some insane speed at least once just for the fun of it - higher than that speed mentioned too.

I dont agree with what this guy did and I hardly want to encourage such behaviour as I can only imagine what would happen if something went wrong, but you know the saying - people who live in glass houses shouldnt throw stones...

It isn't a question of acting innocent, nor a question of getting caught.

It is simply an attempt to convince people that doing things like this bloke did can have really bad long term consequences. Putting aside the obvious like killing and or injuring people, the low end of the scale includes bad shit like:

1. Bringing more negative publicity to the car enthusiast community

2. Damaging and/or destroying your car.

3. Getting yourself a criminal record.

4. Losing your licence.

5. Getting yourself an awful driving record that makes insurance near on impossible to get.

And it goes on and on.

If anyone wants to listen to those members of SAU who have done track days & the like they will get a consistant message about entering properly organised, sanctioned events of any kind:

1. It's safe.

2: It's responsible

3: It's legal.

4: It is by far and away far more challenging and enjoyable than arsing about on any public road will ever be.

Which is all there is to say, really.

Edited by djr81

Just for discussion...what about that Rich bloke(think it was singleton or something)

he got caught speeding well over the limit but obviously his rich lawyers produced

facts that indicate the car he was speeding in was well equipped and safe enough to do those speeds.

anyone else recall much of this...pretty sure it happend in Sydney.

Yeh i can't remember the bloke or car but something along those lines.

Just for discussion...what about that Rich bloke(think it was singleton or something)

Yeah it was Singo. Bentley Turbo IIRC. If you had the cash you could do the same thing (if you car was up to standard). Lawyer might have been Chris Murphy.

Yeah it was Singo. Bentley Turbo IIRC. If you had the cash you could do the same thing (if you car was up to standard). Lawyer might have been Chris Murphy.

LOL!!! My dads mate haha, yea he's pretty good at what he does.. I think he represented me on a neg driving charge, that or one of my other dad's mates..

Yea I'm pretty lucky to know people like that.. It's sad though that is how the system can work.. Like one bloke who represented me knew the magistrate cause she was his best mates g/f for a while.. That case went my way..

Although tbh, most of the cases where my dad's mates represented me, he was the one feeding them the info and what to say..

So for the record I'm 3/3 in court :)

  • 1 month later...

You couldn't do 263 at a track, you'd have to brake to make it round the next turn.....

At least he did it on a highway and not in a 50 zone like a late friend of mine did, flipped his car into a tree and put his mate in a wheelchair, could have been much worse, probably wouldn't have happened on a highway.

If no amount of training make you able to 'safely' speed why are the police allowed to.....?

People will always speed regardless of the vehicle whether it be a barina magna or ferrari, its human nature, its just that your average joe that doesn't have a million bucks to pay his Solicitor to say...

" It's a Ferrari, your honour, a supercar that is capable of reaching insane speeds on public roads safely, it's built to do it therefore its ok".

... and get away with it.

And If this bloke did kill your family or someone you knew, he'd have to live with it, every minute of everyday of the rest of his life, that in itself is quite a load to bare, regardless of the puisnment you or the courts could dish out.

I'd rather have this guy, who appears to have an above average skill level of driving, heading towards me on the other side of the road at 200+ then some young 17 yo old p plater with 4 mates in his dads

V8 falcodore that he was told not to drive.

Everybody has done something wrong at one stage in their life, those of you who sit there and talk of the terrible thing this kid has done are hypocrites.

Experience is just another name for a whole lot of mistakes, I dare say that this incident will make this guy grow up very quickly.

This guy doesn't give us a bad name the media does, guns don't kill people, people kill people and speeding doesn't kill it is the sudden stop at the end that does.

agreed.

One could argue that someone who pulls out at the wrong time isn't attentive...

I have read elsewhere in this forum of people losing control of their vehicles at low speeds around 'slippery' corners, its situations like this where I'd rather have an experienced 'HOON' sliding/drifting beside me rather than a careful driver sliding out of control without a clue about where the vehicle will end up or what they should do.

Some people are born to go fast... race car drivers, pilots etc etc, some people are born to play chess.

  • 2 months later...
He did not make a sensible choice. He simply decided not to compound his stupidity with even more of the same.

The reason this sort of stuff is treated so seriously is because it can and does kill people. Something that picking up small change from the pavement is unlikely to do.

There are no conditions on a freeway or any other public road where it is safe to do 263km/h when other road users are doing 100 or less. The closing speeds are frightening. You only need someone to change lanes infront of you (What you don't check your mirrors for people 100 metres away?) for things to end up in the mother of all accidents. Now I say accident, but it isn't really, is it? More of an inevitable consequence of recklessnes & stupidity.

I cannot believe anyone is defending this idiot. :(

Word!

This guy is obviously an absolute tosser! How can anyone possibly defend him? There is nothing sensible about going that speed limit. Nothing can justify this type of action! He more than likely shat his pants when he saw the sirens, rather than having a lesser fine in mind or being sensible. It's people like this who give us all a bad name.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...