Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

has this car actually run a 9 second pass yet or is he just claiming it because of the power it makes????

ive never seen or heard of this car running other then on a dyno

ohh n im not tryin to bag his car out or anything like that im just curious

Edited by UWISSH!
has this car actually run a 9 second pass yet or is he just claiming it because of the power it makes????

ive never seen or heard of this car running other then on a dyno

ohh n im not tryin to bag his car out or anything like that im just curious

no...went to the track and ran 12.4 and 12.2 and then finally ran a respectable time of 10.6

Im still the only RH9 car Croydon racing has ever produced (well i built the car, and they did the engine and tuning)

Id really like to have a drive :D

it runs a hollinger seqential and ran slicks to achieve the 10.6, so even if it did run a 9 it still would not be classified RH9 as you have to run on radials.

I prefer to run the numbers before i even entertain the thought of talking up the times...but to each their own i suppose.

Edited by DiRTgarage
would like to see some specs and pic on it...

ill try and list what i know

N1 block

JUN 2.7ltr stroker crank

JUN conrods

JUN pistons

JUN oil pump

JUN 288 deg 11.35mm lift camshafts

JUN titanium retainers

JUN valve springs

JUN and ARP engine bolts (mains head and cam cap studs)

JUN radiator and header tank system

ACL race seies engine bearings

Race ported head

Nitto 1mm oversize valves

Nitto valve guides

Preformance metalcraft 9 ltr sump

TRUST 1.5mm DRAG head gasket

TRUST T88-38GK

TRUST manifold

TRUST external gate

TRUST B-pipe

TRUST 4 inch race exhaust

TRUST 160mm DRAG intercooler

OS Giken harmonic balancer

OS Giken quad plate clutch

OS Giken front and rear diffs

Hollinger sequential 6 speed gearbox

MoTeC M800 ecu

MoTeC CDI

Blitz ID-III boost controller

NOS Nitrous system (unknown quantity of gas used)

Performance metalcraft catch can system

thats just off the top of my head...ill add anything else that comes to mind.

its basically the same long engine as ours without the 2.7ltr crank (ours is STD stroke)

Edited by DiRTgarage

didnt it have twin 3040 turbs on it when it did 1000+hp at the treads???

Funny as hell, i have the same internal mods except it is a trust 2.7 kit and 280 cams in/ex with tilton triple and cusco diffs oh and 3037s twins...

havent seen the car for a while its gone in to hiding...

thought he tried to sell it, funnily enough my 34R is MNPII as well, and no i dont want to be the same... hahhaha

Edited by Dr R
no...went to the track and ran 12.4 and 12.2 and then finally ran a respectable time of 10.6

Im still the only RH9 car Croydon racing has ever produced (well i built the car, and they did the engine and tuning)

Id really like to have a drive :D

it runs a hollinger seqential and ran slicks to achieve the 10.6, so even if it did run a 9 it still would not be classified RH9 as you have to run on radials.

I prefer to run the numbers before i even entertain the thought of talking up the times...but to each their own i suppose.

yeh i didnt think that it had run the time, just goes to show that just because you have the power doesnt mean that you will run fast times

what was the story with the runs??? couldnt get the power down? bad launches? bad driver?

I also thought it had twin 3540's and an Apexi twin entry 150mm cooler.

The car definitely has all the gear to run the times very easily...it's just a matter of getting it down the track. At Compak Attak it was the driver's first attempt at racing the car and it was done (erroneously) using full slicks. A 10.6 with 145+MPH TS means that the car has the potential to run well into the 9's.

didnt it have twin 3040 turbs on it when it did 1000+hp at the treads???

yeah...it then made 1100hp with the T88-38GK

it may have been John's first time at the track with THIS car...but he's got more runs under his belt than most (previously ran a R32 GTR into the mid 10's as well)

Edited by DiRTgarage
i see the massive brembos have been ditched, possibly to accomodate a smaller wheel for the track?

that photo is over 2 years old...Dario's ute is in the background and its been back on the road for over 18 months

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
    • Low battery? Maybe check capacity? I know first-hand, on BMWs if your battery drops below 80% capacity, it starts causing strange issues.
    • 8.5 +37 = should fit rear, but I think it'll hit on front. What you want is low 30s/high 20's front, mid 30's rear. That 17" screenshot you posted looks good, I'd run it on my R32 (but that's long dead now). For tyre sizes, my rule of thumb is: 8': 235, 9": 255. But that's just my opinion. Nismo sizes: 18x8.5+35/18x9.5+38 is a good starting point.
×
×
  • Create New...