Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Why Not?? It was a real mean looking car with its open mouth; cool stripes across the bonnet and down the sides of the front quarter panel/

Engine? The big one had a 427cu.in. did it not. Correct me if you will

from my memory the 69 SS Camaro got the 396 big block.This was the model with the flip around headlights. Where the regular Camaros got the 327 and 350 cube engines. The only model that came with the bigger engine than that was the special build Yenko Camaro. it scored the 427 cube Big block. This was the blue Camaro in Fast & Furious 2.

Edited by GTR-32U
  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

from my memory the 69 SS Camaro got the 396 big block.This was the model with the flip around headlights. Where the regular Camaros got the 327 and 350 cube engines. The only model that came with the bigger engine than that was the special build Yenko Camaro. it scored the 427 cube Big block. This was the blue Camaro in Fast & Furious 2.

So was the Yenko model also referred to as the 'Nikki' ? I also got the impression that the wheelbase was better suited to cornering than the 'stang and that the front axle was further forward ? Is this correct ?

Love or hate the brand, but the XA/XB Falcon coupes (with suitable wheels) are a very attractive and balanced looking car, from every angle. HQ GTS coupe is pretty good too.

Pantera with the full GT5 Flares, wings and things is a big winner.

365GTB/4 Daytona is awesome but technically 60's.

Lancia Stratos is an amazing looking car...perhaps a bit unfinished from the rear.

240Z is pretty timeless but again I guess its a 60's car.

So was the Yenko model also referred to as the 'Nikki' ? I also got the impression that the wheelbase was better suited to cornering than the 'stang and that the front axle was further forward ? Is this correct ?

dont really know what the whole nikki thing is sorry. As for cornering better than the mustang i doubt it. cant see any reason why the front end would be any different to any other Camaro of that era

There's no argument about the magnificent shape - even performance of the Countach & Esprit T of the 70s.

But can I relay to you what was around in the very early 70s when I'd just become a chemist and still could only afford 'budget'?

They included...

i) Datsun 1600 (my 1st car)

ii) Torana XU-1

iii) MG B

iv) Falcon GT HO Phase II then III.

v) Lotus Europa

These were the dream cars that we could afford with a half a year's pay and could therefore realistically aspire to...

Now here comes the interesting bit...

CHECK OUT HOW MUCH THOSE 5 CARS ARE WORTH TO-DAY!!! MIND-BOGGLING ISN'T IT???

Thanks for correcting me on the Miura which could be definitely conceptualised in the late 60s with the film Italian Job

The Alfetta GT is not as valuable as the 105 that you like so much. But somehow I like that 1974 shape that came out then and became the Alfetta GTV in late 70s as a 2 litre fast cornering bullet. The GTV 6 came out around '84 and won many races in Europe as well as here. It was made famous in Octopussy when 007 stole one and drove it like he...... well you know the rest.

My favourite design? The Alfa Romeo Montreal !

In fact, the Montreal is a 60s design too. First shown as a 4 cylinder concept car at the EXPO in Montreal in 1967, it received the 2.6 litre V8 and a few body revisions when it went on sale around 1971.

The Lamborghini Urraco is another beautiful looking car.

In fact, the Montreal is a 60s design too. First shown as a 4 cylinder concept car at the EXPO in Montreal in 1967, it received the 2.6 litre V8 and a few body revisions when it went on sale around 1971.

The Lamborghini Urraco is another beautiful looking car.

Yes, I stand corrected on the facts of the Montreal. Thanks for that. I've read stories about how lumpy the cams are; to the extent that guys at a set of lights and wearing tight jeans could end up with an erection.

Agree with you on the shape of the Urraco. Very chiselled look. A neighbour 1 Km away has a yellow one - very gaudy.

Cheers, T

GTHO phase 3 was my favourite. best looking aussie car, plus had the performance too. but wow they cost alot now though. love the camaro just saw a ep of overhaulin where they did one up and it actually still had the original engine in it they were all very surprised when they matched the codes up it was a 350 so they just rebuilt it and put it back in, the end result was awsome it looked fantastic, chip foose is a legend all the cars he does always look awsome.

if we are talking about late 60's as well you cant go past the mustang especially the 68' mustangs. mustangs are my favourite car and always will be. one day i will own one i dont care about fuel prices its just something i have to have lol.

  • 1 month later...
  • 11 months later...

And the Best Car Design of the 50s has to go to Alfa Romeo BAT #5 or #7 or #9

Made by Alfa Romeo Berline Aerodynamics Technica = the original Batmobiles.

Only 3 ever rolled out from 'Concept'.

Value now? A cool US$8-10 million!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...