Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Real shame as I was planning on running the 180 on this.

I never ran it on Racing previsouly due to a lack of servos with the fuel, so I couldn't guarantee I'd always be able to get it... oh well

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Okay well I tried to send Shell an email but their links appear broken....so I sent it to their head office in the Netherlands as well as the web support link that appears to be the only one working on the ozzie site.

Feel free to modify or send your own....

To Whom It May Concern,

I have recently been informed that you are phasing out the Shell V-Power Racing 100ron fuel due to a changing market. To be

frank, I couldn't believe what I was reading!

I use V-Power Racing because I drive a high performance car and regularly enjoy it on Australia's racetracks. Not only does

the 100ron fuel protect against pinging in adverse conditions but my car is now actually tuned for it.

Can you please explain to me what these 'changing market conditions' are that have forced you to phase out the fuel? It is my

understanding that you add ethanol to your existing product (V-Power 98ron) and if this is the case, surely isn't a shortage of

ethanol that has forced this, as Australia has surplus of it.

Secondly, with the rising cost of fuel, perhaps people aren't driving as far and leaving their car home more often than not? If

that is the case, you should be reducing the standard unleaded fuel as the people who buy that are more than likely to leave

their car at home. Frankly the people who buy V-Power Racing or V-Power fuel are either enthusiasts like myself or drive very

expensive exotica. Enthusiasts aren't going to cut down their driving as we do it for fun or as a hobby, and certainly people who

drive expensive exotica aren't going to worry themselves over a petrol price rise. Clearly there is still a vibrant market for V-

Power Racing.

Lastly, perhaps your sales figures are forcing your hand? This, as you should know, is a very one sided view. The facts are that

due to an extremely limited group of service stations that sell V-Power Racing, as well as the fact there have been various

supply problems that have left the pumps dry for periods of time, it should come as no surprise that sales figures aren't exactly

sky high. You also have to add that quite often the service stations that do stock it, sell out so quickly that potential customers

are turned away. Due to these reasons, I am happy to drive well out of my way in order to buy this fuel (might I add passing

about 5-7 service stations on the way, 2 of which are Shell) and I am not the only one. An acquaintance of mine is happy to

drive over 12km...YES 12 km's in order to buy V-Power Racing.

Many overseas countries have 100ron fuel available as the norm whereas Australia has a history of dirty, low octane fuel. This is

evidenced by the fact that car manufacturers spend millions detuning their cars for sale in Australia just to cope with the fuel

that is available. In this day and age there is no excuse for this, and instead of car manufacturers passing the cost to people

who buy their products (through higher 'compliance' costs included in price of purchase) they should charge the fuel

companies that provide a sub-standard product. Finally, a company has stepped up and Shell has produced a world class

product for sale here in Australia only to turn around and remove it from sale?!

The facts state that you have a product made from easily available raw products, a market that not only is strong and loyal but

could be larger if availability was improved as well as the fact that currently you have a 100% market share. Shell has all of this

in their hands and yet you decide to phase out the product. If these are the decisions that Shell is making I wouldn't like to be

a shareholder.

I can only hope you come to your senses and I will look forward to your reply,

Yours Sincerely,

^^^^ you raise some good points there. You would think having a 100% market share would only serve to increase the number of outlets selling V-racing...

and i agree, the increased price of fuel won't stop me from taking the 32 out for long weekend cruises/touges :D

i look forward to seeing Shell's response (if any)

The increased price of fuel hasn't stopped me in the slightest! I really do think that what they are doing is just a stupid idea. I don't know how they came to the conclusion that it was failing, but I can imagine some idiot with graphs of information showing how much money v power isn't making, totally ignoring the fact that for 2 months you couldn't buy the stuff! Not to mention that before that it was a luck of draw to get it any day of the week. I used to drive through the servo on the way to work every morning to check if they had it.

All they have to look at is the fact that 100% of what was made, was sold. Also that a shortage of the stuff was quite big news! I don't know what factor has made them phase it out, but if it's financial, there's something they aren't telling us, cause that fuel sold better then hotcakes on a cold morning...

i been a member of the drive thru n check club for ages because i have a shell at the end of my street - do the people at shell ever wonder why skylines are constantly doing drive bys on the Vpower pumps only to spot the dreaded little yellow sign on the hose.

I've had some dirty looks in the past...

Especially when the bodykit was brand new and I had nowhere to mount the front plate, I went through there 2 days in a row and drove off, then the third day stopped and when I went in to pay he said he was CERTAIN I was going to do a runner :laugh:

The plate was up on the dash inside the car, but I suppose it wasn't very noticeable :P

It's simple economics.

Even if the supply probs of VPR hadn't happened, a pump supplying E10 will sell a LOT more fuel over any given time-frame than a pump selling VPR. I'll also take a guess that there's a bigger margin on E10 as well compared to VPR.

As alway, it always comes back to the almighty $$$.........

It's simple economics.

Even if the supply probs of VPR hadn't happened, a pump supplying E10 will sell a LOT more fuel over any given time-frame than a pump selling VPR. I'll also take a guess that there's a bigger margin on E10 as well compared to VPR.

As alway, it always comes back to the almighty $$$.........

I dont think so, there is competition in the supply of 92 ron and blended ethanol, Shell have to match the price of the competition. Whereas with VPR they have a monopoly, they can get away with charging a couple of cents more, us enthusiasts will pay for it. Try it on 92 and the Wallys will just go to the next servo.

No matter which way I look at it, it is a bad decision based on the reasons they have given. Sheel are going to look stupid if there are other reasons and they are simply hiding behind the false demand numbers. Like maybe they can't make it reliably because the local refineries are not up to the quality, in which case own up Shell, don't lie about it.

Cheers

Gary

I'm really interested to see if Ant gets a reply and what it will be. He addresses the main points as to why they shouldn't be phasing it out, so I would like to see the main points, in DETAIL, as to why they ARE phasing it out...

Should also send Shell the thread link.

I went from BP Ultimate to V Power Racing and continued to do so for the last 4 months. I have a dozen service stations around me within a 3 minute drive, yet I would drive for 10 minutes to get to a Shell with VPower Racing, no matter what the price was I filled up.

Shell should strive to provide quality fuels or lift up the quality of fuels in general.

I guess BP will have an opportunity to cater for the High Performance Cars now...

Everybody send them an email telling them what we all think of this decision. Do it politely tho, nothing makes a corporation nervous like hitting their backpockets by going to competitor especially if we all tell them we will do so if they decide its gone

Ok I had a response from the head office in the Netherlands basically saying that it was a local decision made by Shell Australia and that they can't do anything about it.

Funny I would've thought that the HO could do more than that but considering the size of Shell, each area (Asia, America etc etc) is proabably run separately.

Wow thats a bit of a lame response, i would have thought that would have gone into a bit of an explanation as to why.

Well I'm still waiting on Shell Australia's response....some PR man is probably sweating it out in a basement somewhere :(

Okay well I tried to send Shell an email but their links appear broken....so I sent it to their head office in the Netherlands as well as the web support link that appears to be the only one working on the ozzie site.

Hello Ant97GTR

Thanks for your post.

Just letting you know that the email you sent to Shell has been received by Shell. Please expect a personal reply to your queriers within the coming days.

Cheers

Adam

Everybody send them an email telling them what we all think of this decision. Do it politely tho, nothing makes a corporation nervous like hitting their backpockets by going to competitor especially if we all tell them we will do so if they decide its gone

Title: STRENGTH IN NUMBERS

In fact, can we co-ordinate this effort by contacting forums from

Ferrari

Maserati

Alfa Romeo

Lamborghini

Aston Martin

Jaguar

BMW

Mercedes B

Audi

Honda

Porsche

Bentley

VW

TO DO THE SAME rather than in dribs and drabs?

Okay everyone I did receive a call from Shell Australia, and while she wasn't a tech and therefore able to provide details the following is a sum up of what she said....

Basically due to the fact that australia has a limited refining capacity they are unable to make vpower racing. This is due to the fact that the base product they use to make vp racing by adding ethanol is not an existing product. This means that in order to refine and make vpower racing they have to hold production of vpower and (I think) E10. This causes problems with the supply of not only vp racing but two other of their products and therefore they are not in the position to continue making vpower racing.

In her own words, vpower racing is a very profitable product and they are aware that they have a good market for it, however at this time they do not have the refining capacity to continue making it. This decision had been made and it is very unlikely that it will change due the factors I have mentioned.

Shell have offered to send a rep and/or tech expert to have an open discussion at a SAU Vic meeting, so I will contact the committee and set up a date.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...