Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

N1 Turbos are laggy, but they can handle a tonne of boost. Just means you have to rev the engine (We ran ours to 8500rpm)

As I've said before, once you move the pickup, and gate the std sump it'll do the job easily.

You don't see many Targa cars on the circuit, because most of the cars don't have a racing class to fit into.

When the Targa class in tassie got to run at the V8 Supercars, the only cars that couldn't handle the 15 lap races (local races are 5-7 laps) were the circuit cars. The cars that compete in Targa just kept going and going.

There is no doubt in my mind now that a PROPERLY set-up GT-R on Targa N1's is pretty much as good as anything for a circuit car (bar the superlap type specs).

My car would easily run sub 1.20's at Sandown now - and there sure ain't many cars running sub 1.20 at Sandown. I used to be convinced you needed around 400awkw's to achieve that but we now have several cars closer to 300 running those times.

Looking at history the Gibson cars were doing Bathurst in 2.15's and Sandown in 1.16's on slicks. So if my car can do 1.18's on R Comps at Sandown I'd say sub 2.20's on slicks would not be an issue - if the driver is up to it.

There is no doubt in my mind now that a PROPERLY set-up GT-R on Targa N1's is pretty much as good as anything for a circuit car (bar the superlap type specs).

My car would easily run sub 1.20's at Sandown now - and there sure ain't many cars running sub 1.20 at Sandown. I used to be convinced you needed around 400awkw's to achieve that but we now have several cars closer to 300 running those times.

Looking at history the Gibson cars were doing Bathurst in 2.15's and Sandown in 1.16's on slicks. So if my car can do 1.18's on R Comps at Sandown I'd say sub 2.20's on slicks would not be an issue - if the driver is up to it.

Completely agree Snowy. You'll remember the Dutton I was at with you, I ran the White 34 around Sandown in a 1:20.1 from memory, and I'd never seen the track and did four laps. I think a reasonably fast Tugga car is pretty fast anywhere, even my dirty 32 is one of the faster cars of it's ilk around Lakeside.

Yep - it's like sav suggested N1's are laggy.

They are only laggy if you run bigger cams chasing top end speed/power. My car was full boost by 3,000rpm and had 300awkw's by 4,500rpm. Hardly laggy. Consequently we were shifting before 8,000rpm too.

(but I run stock cams)

Good response and GOOD handling - and these cars will be quick around most tracks.

tomei 260 9.15 cams are pretty mild (what i've got).....are you saying even they are too big for good response?

from memory mark berry's 32 had the same cams with n1's in the early days and that thing was an animal down low. Mind you i think he had about 28psi running through it.

The biggest issue with bigger cams I found is the off throttle response. Off the throttle into a corner and back on the throttle there is a lag in response compared to standard cams.

Back in the early Dutton days - I had those cams and -5's. My car made 380awkw's. And I was able to run 1.21's at Sandown. We changed back to standard cams - which according to the dyno was WORSE through the middle - and ran 1.19's. But you could massively feel the difference in back on throttle response which is where the time came from. Even bigger gains were had a places like Winton where there was more benefit to throttle response.

I have had more tubro / cam combinations than I care to consider on an RB26 engine - but if I was building a new one from scratch (which is basically what I did last year) I would build one with standard cams and N1's and know I could run around all day long and beat 99% of cars out there. (And the ones I couldn't beat would probably be 1 lap wonders).

And yeah - Mark was running straight 110 race fuel. I've always run 98RON from the petrol station.

Yep - it's like sav suggested N1's are laggy.

They are only laggy if you run bigger cams chasing top end speed/power. My car was full boost by 3,000rpm and had 300awkw's by 4,500rpm. Hardly laggy. Consequently we were shifting before 8,000rpm too.

(but I run stock cams)

Good response and GOOD handling - and these cars will be quick around most tracks.

I think he is talking R33/R32 N1 turbos though, sav - correct me if i am wrong.

So if he is, 33/32 N1 items are ridiculously laggy. Think worse than -5 response, for the same power as R34 N1 turbos.

It's not a pretty picture as nothing happens below 4500rpm with the older variants and hence you need to ring balls to get anywhere

yep R33 N1's, full boost at 5500rpm. dad ran 25psi through them in Targa 2010, and we checked them after the event, and they are still like new. cams were stockers n1's.

anyone with R34 N1's who winges needs a kick in the pants.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I seem to the be only person that is using a Haltech 2500 on an NA motor, I've installed a Bosch DBW throttle body to the OEM intake manifold and am having problems maintaining AFR even with the wideband o2.  It will run extremely rich at idle and up to redline, but under load it will go extremely lean in the 20s and i'm essentially having to rev it over 4k and feather the clutch to get it up to speed.  I've read a few other threads of about the butterfly, it seems removing the vacuum to it is supposed to have it remain open, i've noticed no difference under 4k with the vacuum line to it plugged.  I'm hoping someone here has had luck using the NA manifold with Haltech, and if they happen to have a tune for it.  
    • I don't know any details, but I really wouldn't be surprised if they do it as a LHD only version, at least initially.
    • Thanks for the replies everyone. Definitely a coolant push. Oil catch can is empty and always has been. As the engine is out now I'll be having a good look over things. I do have some detonation on the piston tops from a trigger issue back about 5 years ago. I felt it and shut off then bought a new ecu and changed the trigger. Never been an issue since. It never hurt the power, its made almost 80hp more since that incident but I will pull the bearing caps to take a look. If the bearings are damaged I will do a bottom end refresh. Head is being re conditioned at the moment and the block will be cleaned and checked to ensure it's flat. I'll go with a kameari gasket and see how it ends up. The other thing I'm not super keen on is the cylinder colours. I suspect this is from the inlet manifold. The plan will be to put it back together, retune and then stick a plazmaman billet inlet on it and retune. I'm happy with the power, if it makes a little more, then great, but I would rather just make everything more efficient at this stage.
    • Maybe they'll look to do a bunch of presales to help inject some cash fast for their financial issues...
    • Does it also misfire equally when revving?   Josh is very correct in what you should do. The coilpack harness wiring loom itself is a known problem due to its age and the number of heat cycles it has gone through. Throwing parts at a vehicle to diagnose the issue isn't a smart or good way to do it. Secondly, you may have a bad coil pack, you pop replacements in, they fix that issue, but messing with the harness breaks it, so the issue persists. So now you think "well it wasn't the coil packs" and have to continue chasing your tail, potentially swapping back in your shit coil packs and returning the good ones (yes, I've seen people do this because 'it wasn't the problem' and they want to save money). And suddenly, you've got two issues with the same symptoms...   Diagnose, don't use the spare parts shotgun.
×
×
  • Create New...