Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yeah im still checking from others that have bought sr sensors & have been told the extra wire on them is for when used on a rb26, so was just asking again if anyone else knew anything.

yeah i looked under there but cant see em, must have to get at them underneath the car.

thanks again for your help

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Unsure exactly what you mean by extra wire.

The SR20 uses 2 wires just like the rb26 does.

They sensors look identical apart from their part number. Most likely just slightly different tuning of the knock sensor?

Its quite possible the sr20 might work. Possibly the 26 knock sensors are just a little more sensitive?? unsure

Unsure exactly what you mean by extra wire.

The SR20 uses 2 wires just like the rb26 does.

They sensors look identical apart from their part number. Most likely just slightly different tuning of the knock sensor?

Its quite possible the sr20 might work. Possibly the 26 knock sensors are just a little more sensitive?? unsure

yeah im not sure what he meant by that either, anyway ive found the part numbers for sr/rb26 & they are different.

22060 30P00 - SR20DET knock sensor

22060 05U00 - RB26DETT knock sensor

so im not going to risk it, has to be R32gtr sensors or nothing.

wish me luck finding a cheap set lol..

cheers

RB20 det sensors are different. So they simply do not work.

Its not necessary to change the sensors providing the tune is good you don't have to worry. I didn't change det sensors for quite some time.

Just keep an eye out for a pair of 26 sensors when they pop up grab.

just found out from the seller that he still uses the stock rb20 knock sensors with this rb26 fc & he says they work fine!

thats a relief :D

Edited by norwest_rumbler
just found out from the seller that he still uses the stock rb20 knock sensors with this rb26 fc & he says they work fine!

thats a relief :)

yeah they all work the same, i have no issues with them, i always tune with my GIZZMO knock controller for extra sensitivity but but the stock ones work fine, in fact (for those with RB25) the numbers on the ACTUAL GTR, GTST and SR sensors are the same :( i know the RB20 ones are old school but they still relay the same info..... the good old RB20DE still uses the old school sensors in the R33 :)

paulr33 looked at doing it for a while, but it turned out that it wasn't really worth his time financially.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Rb...rb-t161511.html

I've looked into it a little bit.

Your looking at $1000 for a new PFC from Nengun for RB26 (On special for $900 delivered at the moment)

http://www.nengun.com/apexi/power-fc-hand-controller

$150 odd for the harness from boomslang

http://www.boomslang.us/extension.htm

Plus labor costs, if any, for someone to wire it up.

I took a print out of the RB20DET and RB26DETT ECU pinout diagrams to my local auto electrician and he said that it shouldn't be too much trouble. Listed below are the following differences between the ecu's.

RB20

RB20DET.jpg

RB26

RB26DETT.jpg

ECU pinout diagrams taken from the Nissan RB workshop manual

RB20DET

Pin # 5 -Engine A/T Control Input Signal (BT1)

Pin # 6 -Blank

Pin # 14-Engine A/T Control Input Signal (BT2)

Pin # 15-Engine A/T Control Input Signal (BT3)

Pin # 25 -Blank

Pin # 34-Blank

Pin # 35-Blank

Pin # 104 -Fuel Pump Terminal Volt Control Output (FPCM )

Pin # 106 -Blank

Pin # 112-Injector No.# 4

Pin # 114- Injector No.# 6

Pin # 115- Exhaust Gas Sensor (Ground)

RB26DETT

Pin # 5 -Blank

Pin # 6 -Sub Electrical Fan Relay (engine temp SW)

Pin # 14-Blank

Pin # 15-Blank

Pin # 25 -Wastegate valve control solenoid valve

Pin # 34-Air Flow Meter Ground

Pin # 35-Air Flow Meter Intake Air Signal (Front)

Pin # 36-Intake Air Temp Sensor

Pin # 55-Exhaust Gas Sensor (rear)

Pin # 104 -Fuel Pump Terminal Volt Control Output (FPCM 1)

Pin # 106 -Fuel Pump Terminal Volt Control Output (FPCM 2)

Pin # 112- Injector No.# 6

Pin # 114-Injector No.# 4

Pin # 115-Blank

Although i have to say i didn't know Uras was converting them for $1800 installed.

Do you convert the L-Jetro afm version as well Uras?

Edited by White GTS-T
Although i have to say i didn't know Uras was converting them for $1800 installed.

Do you convert the L-Jetro afm version as well Uras?

im an ecu broad minded female.... will do anything. :(

  • 2 weeks later...

ok i installed the power fc i bought from Rad32 & it all seems to work fine.

it still has his tune on it i believe, which basically is for gtr injectors & z32 afm i am still on stock for now.

my car started & ran but the idle was very low (almost stalling) & i was able to rev it up a few thousand revs.

so m just asking for verification that all is normal.

im sure it is but just want to check this is what people would expect?

also when i check the sensors/inputs on the commander is there any thing i should look for?

thanks

edit: btw i wont be driving on this ecu until i get a afm

Edited by NWR31
yeah they all work the same, i have no issues with them, i always tune with my GIZZMO knock controller for extra sensitivity but but the stock ones work fine, in fact (for those with RB25) the numbers on the ACTUAL GTR, GTST and SR sensors are the same :P i know the RB20 ones are old school but they still relay the same info..... the good old RB20DE still uses the old school sensors in the R33 :)

Hey Buddy..

Double check that one. The GTR knock sensors are definitely different to the rb20/25 knock sensors.

They work off the same principle but the voltage output is different resulting in the pfc's interpretation being off.

Get a multimeter on to them you'll see what I mean.

I've seen the same thing on the dyno with multiple R33's and R32's also when fitting up the GTR pfc.

Drop the RB26 knock sensors on and bingo a normal knock readout.

NWR31.. You'll see what I mean, the knock readout with the gtr pfc and rb20/25 knock sensors is not worth a pinch of shiet.

The part number between the sr20 and rb26 knock sensors are different. By all means give them a go if you have no luck sourcing 26 ones. :D

I'm surprised it runs with the z32 and gtr injector tune on your setup. :D

  • 5 years later...

What is so hard to work out? Tim laid it out for you on a platter didn't he?

Quote.

ECU pinout diagrams taken from the Nissan RB workshop manual

RB20DET

Pin # 5 -Engine A/T Control Input Signal (BT1)

Pin # 6 -Blank

Pin # 14-Engine A/T Control Input Signal (BT2)

Pin # 15-Engine A/T Control Input Signal (BT3)

Pin # 25 -Blank

Pin # 34-Blank

Pin # 35-Blank

Pin # 104 -Fuel Pump Terminal Volt Control Output (FPCM )

Pin # 106 -Blank

Pin # 112-Injector No.# 4

Pin # 114- Injector No.# 6

Pin # 115- Exhaust Gas Sensor (Ground)

RB26DETT

Pin # 5 -Blank

Pin # 6 -Sub Electrical Fan Relay (engine temp SW)

Pin # 14-Blank

Pin # 15-Blank

Pin # 25 -Wastegate valve control solenoid valve

Pin # 34-Air Flow Meter Ground

Pin # 35-Air Flow Meter Intake Air Signal (Front)

Pin # 36-Intake Air Temp Sensor

Pin # 55-Exhaust Gas Sensor (rear)

Pin # 104 -Fuel Pump Terminal Volt Control Output (FPCM 1)

Pin # 106 -Fuel Pump Terminal Volt Control Output (FPCM 2)

Pin # 112- Injector No.# 6

Pin # 114-Injector No.# 4

Pin # 115-Blank

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...