Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Chasing some info on RB26 valves, I'm in the process of a solid rebuild after lunching a ceramic turbo. Forged pistons, bearings etc, bottom end is all together.

After a quick look at the head though, the valves have been damaged.

Now, the problem, I've lurked around the internets for hours now, and searched these forums from top to bottom, including all the sponsors, nobody seems to sell valves.

I found one standard set, second hand...

What kind of valves have people used in their rebuilds, and where did you find em?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/235579-rb26-valves-for-rebuild/
Share on other sites

naprec valves are good and cheap. I don't know who sells them in aus, I bought mine in japan, but I'm sure you can get them here too.

ive heard that the naprec valves run a smaller than standard size stem which could cause possible reliability problems in the long term with big revs..

i assume you've got the 1.5mm oversize..

so how are yours holding together and how long have they been in the car?

Another group buy coming along Andrew? (id be in :P )

F%#$K no! never getting involved in one of them again!!

i spoke to my engine builder today and it looks like i'm going to run with standard valves. tho i may still do springs and retainers.

anyone ever use super tech?

i've just ordered the full supertech catalogue (dual springs & ti retainers, guides & OS valves) from the states for a mates motor i'm building, should arrive in the next few days

prices i got were:

valves full set (1mm SS inlet, 1mm Inconel exhaust) - US$499/set

dual springs & ti retainers - US$459/set

manganese bronze guides - US$120/set

total including shipping in aussie $$'s was $1466.12

make sure the guy installing the oversize valves inserts a new valve seat as the std wont cope with the oversize valve

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...