Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Were they run on the same dyno??

Yes, exact same dyno. Dyno Dynamics in Shootout mode.

and the 468rwkw one has run 132mph.

Can you post sheets please? Will help a lot of people decide if the HKS turbo is worth the 2k more...

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

dirt can you post up bp98 tune as well because i want to see comparison of hks t04z with garrett t04z on same fuel

mine made 428rwkw on 24psi (garrett) and another has made 468rwkw on 25psi (garrett). both were standard stroke 2.6l's

is this a 2.6l?

Yes still 2.6 & it made 422rwkw on 22psi & was on synergy8000.

my hks t04z has gone 585rwhp (440rwkw from my calculation) on 18psi on 98 pump fuel on a very very low reading dyno, another brand new dyno dynamics one i went on recently read 40hp more (520hp to 560hp) on lower boost tune, so i reckon it would of been a bit over 600rwhp on any other dyno.

brad!!!

clearly you should know you had about 150rwhp of timing in that tune to make that power

PING IS POWER

Yes, exact same dyno. Dyno Dynamics in Shootout mode.

and the 468rwkw one has run 132mph.

Can you post sheets please? Will help a lot of people decide if the HKS turbo is worth the 2k more...

actually it was a different dyno i think, cause my car was tuned on the new 4wd dyno (in 2wd) and chookos was on the old 2wd one

chookos made 454rwkw or 608rwhp with similar tune to mine, but made more with cam timing and further tuning. my cams never got moved from zero so may have been a little more in it!

same tuner, same workshop, same fuel and very similar engines etc etc

ok, could my standard valve springs and 260 poncams be limiting my power on 24 psi with a t04z to 376awkw (.84 split a/r ex housing)..???

Just a little bit, Dave. :bunny:

PS, I'm still waiting!

Yes, exact same dyno. Dyno Dynamics in Shootout mode.

and the 468rwkw one has run 132mph.

Can you post sheets please? Will help a lot of people decide if the HKS turbo is worth the 2k more...

interesting for me, that youve only run 132mph with 460rwkw. Ive seen an r32 gtr with 360rwkw go 134mph @ 10.8

brad!!!

clearly you should know you had about 150rwhp of timing in that tune to make that power

PING IS POWER

lol Simon, he has never done a power tune on my car only a run in tune on the first motor years ago ;) everyone knows he wont touch an autronic ecu hence why i never used him in the end.

Edited by unique1
interesting for me, that youve only run 132mph with 460rwkw. Ive seen an r32 gtr with 360rwkw go 134mph @ 10.8

Simon's time (10.91 @ 132 with 460rwkw) was with a stock gearbox and $90 shitty tyres.

At 3256lbs (std 32 GTR weight) and 485hp (360rwkw) you shouldn't be running 134mph, more like 124mph.

Can I ask what turbo was used?

Let me guess, it's a 700+hp rated turbo, running in its peak efficiency, and "only" making 485hp at the treads. I'd suspect a very low reading dyno....

Besides the point, all I want to see is a compo between a HKS T04Z and Garrett version, someone post dyno's!!

interesting for me, that youve only run 132mph with 460rwkw. Ive seen an r32 gtr with 360rwkw go 134mph @ 10.8

something im struggling to believe unless it was a super low weighted car with a dog-box on slicks and with that ET i doubt it.

134MPH = at the very least 400AWKW in a R32 GTR

something im struggling to believe unless it was a super low weighted car with a dog-box on slicks and with that ET i doubt it.

134MPH = at the very least 400AWKW in a R32 GTR

im pretty sure he ran around 134mph on another pass...

he was also running standard box so change from 2nd to 3rd was slower than leasurely which would have dropped the mph a fair bit i would imagine.

GRRRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPPPPHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHSSSSSSSSSSSS

r32 gtr, os giken gear set, hks t51r. Not sure if it was lightended, il have to ask him next time i see him.

another r32 gtr with n1's went hi 11s @ 125mph, he had just over 300rwkw. Wasnt a fancy set up either.

My boat did 139.67mph with 456 rwkw although only 10.70 with 1.57 best 60 foot. It had 540 pound springs at the time in rear, yes way too hard and wouldn't weight transfer, and front diff not there.

PS Good power Dave and good result. PPG helical dog box would have less power drain I guess over stock synchro box??

jpzed108a.jpg

Edited by Boosted Zed
r32 gtr, os giken gear set, hks t51r. Not sure if it was lightended, il have to ask him next time i see him.

LOL

HKS T51R... SPL or KAI? Either way its a ~900hp rated turbo, and you reckon it only makes 450rwhp.

Either it's being transfered through a rubber driveline or it's running 14psi.

As I said, thats one hell of a low reading dyno. It's physically not possible for a car that weighs as much as a GT-R to do ~135mph with 450rwhp.

PPG helical dog box would have less power drain I guess over stock synchro box??

No they would be about the same...the gears are the same basic design albeit a more agressive tooth profile and far superior parent material on the PPG. The way each gear is selected whether it be dog engagement or synchromesh has little bearing on the losses after the gear is selected.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...