Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What area are you in? Its at a few places now, so if the skyline isn't your daily driver you'll be fine.

You're talking a 2.6L right? Mine maxed 1000's at 403rwkw but its an rb30 - capacity makes a difference.

I'm near blacktown... as far as I know the closest one is at richmond

and I dont have a 2nd car so the skyline is the daily... even though it doesnt get driven everyday

I see that stated a lot but can't understand why! Can you explain why would engine capacity makes a difference?

Because bigger capacity motors make more torque and hence don't usually rev as much to make the same power.

Edited by Rolls

Because bigger capacity motors make more torque and hence don't usually rev as much to make the same power.

Oh of course - we really should be talking about what torque the injectors max out at since that will be related to airflow - not at what power.

Oh of course - we really should be talking about what torque the injectors max out at since that will be related to airflow - not at what power.

Yeah it can be a bit confusing, being as pulse width is static all that changes is duty cycle. So even though at high rpm more fuel is being injected over time, less fuel is being injected per pulse. So if you have fuel pump issues etc you might see it leaning out at high rpm but fine at peak torque, but if the injector is the issue it will lean out at peak torque.

I think I've got that correct, also explains why injectors required to make x rwkw can vary wildly as seen in this thread.

Just out of curiosity do people ever play with the pulse width to try and get more out of injectors, or will that cause a drop in pressure? Or are injectors designed to operate at a specific pulse with, assuming I haven't got this all ass about?

Edited by Rolls

I'm near blacktown... as far as I know the closest one is at richmond

and I dont have a 2nd car so the skyline is the daily... even though it doesnt get driven everyday

Ermington might be a little closer? its 10-15 from my place (Parra/westmead)

http://www.ethanolanswers.com.au/ethanol/locator

so talked to a reputatble tuner (in sydney) tonight

he's going to be tuning my car going forward

i've decided to go with a Haltech for dual maps

BP98 shoud get be 320-330 all day everyday

and with e85 he said I'll be able to run 27psi and the motor should be fine (he said he's done a fair few unopened RBs with this much boost and its all fine)

and he also said it should crack 380-400kw with e85 :banana:

also asked him about cams and cam gears

with -9s he said there is no need for cams (which seems to be the consensus on here as well)... nor cam gears (which I thought was a little weird)

but I'm gonna go with what he says and see what happens

car should be going in about 5-6 weeks so will keep you all updated

P.S dont start bashing the tuner or me... positive comments only please :thumbsup:

Do eeeeet!!!

Graphs of two pls....with RPM

Thank you

Pls come again

edit...

An update this guys thread while youre at it

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/322850-garrett-gt2860-9s/

Edited by Don Dada

Hey guys quick question.

Is there any real need for a hard pipe kit at around 300kw.

Couldn't hurt could it?

Just gathering bits up for turbo upgrade and wondering if its a good idea.

Cheers

Luke

I think you'll find Rolls is just messing around, or forgetting this isn't an RB20/25 thread :)

Hard pipes are not required for 300rwkw. Spend the money on improving a different area.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...