Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

lol what i really want to know is how that power gets to the ground in a street car?? :(

You can't. That's probably the whole idea.

600rwhp is too much for the street. But f**k it's fun. And hilarious when people coming in the opposite direction move into the bike lane when the see you coming....at an angle.

  • Replies 374
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yeah. im thinking 400hp at the rear is enough in a GTST... when you get to 500 thats too much. 600 would just be good for doing some hecktic skids to impress your mates.

This is unbelievable this car.

Trent, do you mind answering some more questions about that car?

Was the stock power FC knock sensors hooked up ? if so what kind of knock readings was it reporting to the ecu ? and how much was the KMON reading ? i am going to have to buy one very soon.

Would there be any chance i could get a copy of the DAT file in that ECU ? i just interested in having a look... :( big ask i know hehe or even a .log file from a couple of power runs from datalogit ? (if you use it that is)

I assume this was a map sensor'd power FC ???

was there any NOS?

Makes me want to go for a road trip and get you to have a look at my car :D

any videos ?

Great result. Nitrous haters mustn't have ever used it. You have no idea.

That's crazy power delivery. I'd imagine that a 700hp car with another 2000rpm in the band would be quicker everywhere though?!?!

Either way that's some serious mumbo.

Great result. Nitrous haters mustn't have ever used it. You have no idea.

That's crazy power delivery. I'd imagine that a 700hp car with another 2000rpm in the band would be quicker everywhere though?!?!

Either way that's some serious mumbo.

I love NOS and most of my V8 streeters have had at least a 150hp kit fitted. The broom below was my daily (back in the street racng days) had 200hp kit fitted... This R34 used no nitrous, all runs were on sunoco high ocatne fuel

As for rev limit your right but on the dyno there was no point reving it past 8400 as the tune from 8400-9200 stayed the same. On the strip the extra rpm defnately would help stretch the top end.

post-34927-1222228181_thumb.jpg

post-34927-1222228203_thumb.jpg

Edited by URAS
something here doesn't add up...can anybody else pick it?

DO TELL :( the result seems nearly spot on... i spose autosalon will reveal all.

Edited by URAS
DO TELL :(

not trying to detract from what is an awesome machine and well put together and tuned

but somethingis bleedingly obvious from the outset...that im surprised has not been mentioned.

anyway good result Trent...well done.

Edited by DiRTgarage
NONE

:banana: imagine what it would do with it

not trying to detract from what is an awesome machine and well put together and tuned

but somethingis bleedingly obvious from the outset...that im surprised has not been mentioned.

anyway good result Trent...well done.

please explain?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
    • I feel there must have been a FB/insta post and the weekend did not start well at all I hope everyone is all okay
×
×
  • Create New...