Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

didnt this thing struggle to make 450rwkw or something at autosalon? thats bit shy from 1002hp if im correct LOL

car was on semi slicks..... been covered 100000000000000000 times already..... unfortunatley the owner though semis worked better on dyno... the exact opposit is true.

  • Replies 374
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

bro

as you can see.

even this tuner scare to answer why from 1002HP drop down to 450kw.

maybe he just play some magic in front of his customer

would love to see URAS prove his 1002HP on public dyno

:( :( :P

there is ZERO way to fudge the dyno it has ZERO owner inputs which affect power output. Car saw the track a week or so and had a few issues apparentley so was unable to complete a full run but from what i heard from some of my other customers the cars was still sideways at 3/4 when it came close to taking out the timing box :P so hopefully they can fine some speed and put a decent time on the cards.

id be happy fo the car to go to another dyno under my supervision and run by the owner of said dyno and if ames wnats to do that i wld even pay for the time, but at the end of the day neither i or the customer have anything to prove... it is his car and his perogative.

i could post up another batch of cars making well over 700hp that have proven themselves at national dyno comps but that doesnt seem to make a differrence....... i dont need to prove anything to anyone other than the customer if they are happy then thats all that matters.

Edited by URAS
bro

as you can see.

even this tuner scare to answer why from 1002HP drop down to 450kw.

maybe he just play some magic in front of his customer

would love to see URAS prove his 1002HP on public dyno

mate by posting things like that you just look like an idiot.

if you dont have anything worthwhile to say dont say it at all.

there is ZERO way to fudge the dyno it has ZERO owner inputs which affect power output. Car saw the track a week or so and had a few issues apparentley so was unable to complete a full run but from what i heard from some of my other customers the cars was still sideways at 3/4 when it came close to taking out the timing box :( so hopefully they can fine some speed and put a decent time on the cards.

id be happy fo the car to go to another dyno under my supervision and run by the owner of said dyno and if ames wnats to do that i wld even pay for the time, but at the end of the day neither i or the customer have anything to prove... it is his car and his perogative.

i could post up another batch of cars making well over 700hp that have proven themselves at national dyno comps but that doesnt seem to make a differrence....... i dont need to prove anything to anyone other than the customer if they are happy then thats all that matters.

good to hear the car is now at the track Trent...keep the updates coming...any 1/2 track times/speeds available?

I wish Dyno's only had the ability to print out air:fuel mixtures only.

or that there was only an on or off setting.. no loading, ramp, temp correction etc.

or a way to connect some sort of sensor to the fly wheel to actually read engine hp.

number of cry babies here is crazy

  • 5 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...
car was on semi slicks..... been covered 100000000000000000 times already..... unfortunatley the owner though semis worked better on dyno... the exact opposit is true.

hi champ

any up date with the power?

any track time ?

would love to see you prove the 1000hp.

:verymad:

Edited by andrewmoon

Apparently the car lasted 2 runs down the quarter. Not sure what the time was for the first run but on the second run the engine disassembled itself throwing its guts out on the track. Damage was catastrophical, maybe turborxp can tell us more...

oh and btw.. u dont lose a fixed amount of power.. its a percentage. :)

every single engineer knows this.. are u one?? i would say not.. am i?? most definately :sick:

also.. power is just torque with rpm... if rpm climbs higher than torque drops.. power rises

i noticed it drops off extremely quick up the top thou.. not even stock turbos do that.. whats the deal there??

100% agree, the fixed loss drivetrain myth is SO ANNOYING. I beleive the principals of angular (rotational)accelleration are quite straight forward, applying more force to a rotating body will increase losses incurred in the conservation of angular momentum.

I love that people are accusing Trent of fudging figures.....how many cars have you seen that put out big power have issues on dyno days,

Ive personally seen TOPRPM stuggle to make 400rwhp on the dyno and the next day it was back up to 800+ and all the problem was a loose wire for the boost controller so it was only running gate pressure.

Many cars inculding my own have issues every now and again and are down on power due to somthing tiny.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
    • I feel there must have been a FB/insta post and the weekend did not start well at all I hope everyone is all okay
×
×
  • Create New...