Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

its not that the tanks have to be majorly different

its that only 1 brand of tank has paid for the required R&D to be able to certify they are safe

and they charge a mint for their tanks

Just got an email from PJ (Paul) and he just ran 503 rwhp on the JEM dyno with 25 psi on a 3076 and 1.12 exhaust housing on E85 with 1600cc indy blue injectors.

He mentioned they did run up to 27.5 psi boost and made more power but were concerned for the intregity of the SR20 block as it wasn't sleeved.

376 rwks' has surely got to be a record out of a 3076 on any engine.....

He was frying 4th on the M5 :)

Mine will be getting tuned next week.

I made 348 at 19psi.23psi will be the aim next week, id like to see what 25psi makes on the RB though.

PJ also has water injection, so that would keep the air charge temps way down.

Im excited!!! :)

He was frying 4th on the M5 :)

Mine will be getting tuned next week.

I made 348 at 19psi.23psi will be the aim next week, id like to see what 25psi makes on the RB though.

PJ also has water injection, so that would keep the air charge temps way down.

Im excited!!! :)

Yes frying 4th at 160klm's.

He wasn't using the water injection in that 503hp dyno run.....insanely enough there is more power to come.

So he's found and extra 50 odd rwhp from the bigger ex housing, 1 psi more boost, upgraded fuel system, M&W CDI and retune.

He also mentioned EGT's were way down with the larger ex housing - as you would expect.

Been there done that. after a few sets of tyres you wonder what the fuss was all about in the first place.

With a 3076 tho? OK techically PJ is running a T25 flanged HKS 56 trim 3037 on a 2 litre.

Bigger turbo's on bigger engines make bigger torque so you'd kinda expect more fryability.

Edited by juggernaut1
With a 3076 tho? OK techically PJ is running a T25 flanged HKS 56 trim 3037 on a 2 litre.

Bigger turbo's on bigger engines make bigger torque so you'd kinda expect more fryability.

regardless of turbo / setup, you get over it after a while :)

regardless of turbo / setup, you get over it after a while :)

Haha....yes always modifying for that bigger "fix" once you get used to it.

I'm always fascinated how enthusiasts are raising the bar all the time - its amazing what people are screwing out of there motors these days.

However, what was awesome last year is average this year....and so on......where will it ever end. :)

Quick question people. What will 555cc injectors run out at roughly (kw) when using E85 on a gts-t?

About 340rwkw on std pressure using BSFC = 0.6(which is about what I've found).

BTW I've made just over 600rwhp on E85 using 60LB/hr(630cc/min) with 4Bar base pressure on an XR6T which confirms my BSFC calc of 0.6.

Just got an email from PJ (Paul) and he just ran 503 rwhp on the JEM dyno with 25 psi on a 3076 and 1.12 exhaust housing on E85 with 1600cc indy blue injectors.

He mentioned they did run up to 27.5 psi boost and made more power but were concerned for the intregity of the SR20 block as it wasn't sleeved.

376 rwks' has surely got to be a record out of a 3076 on any engine.....

I'm running RB25 with a .68 on a 3037 Pro S.

Standard Manifolds E85 etc etc.

post-46183-1246700127_thumb.jpg

Edited by RB25DETS2

that is some off the chart torque there champ....

must be hell of a ride...

what other supporting mods?

also at what revs is it making full boost?

Edited by allthewaytotheskyline
that is some off the chart torque there champ....

must be hell of a ride...

what other supporting mods?

Yeah mate lots of fun.

Just the normal stuff

PFC

HKS Turbz

850 Sard injectors

Blitz LM cooler

Blitz POD

Standard BOV

Z32 AFM

Nismo FPR

Bosch 044 in tank

Gizzmo EBC

oh and lots of boost :D (23psi)

where is the torque read out?

Heres a torque read out just for you GT....180or200's car in red (3582 .82) and mine in blue(3037 .68) overlayed on the same Dyno.

post-46183-1246776429_thumb.jpg

Heres a torque read out just for you GT....180or200's car in red (3582 .82) and mine in blue(3037 .68) overlayed on the same Dyno.

900nm, nice.. my car was making around 1080nm to 1180nm but it never had a aggresive tune, 500cc don't make too much difference.

Yeah mate lots of fun.

Just the normal stuff

PFC

HKS Turbz

850 Sard injectors

Blitz LM cooler

Blitz POD

Standard BOV

Z32 AFM

Nismo FPR

Bosch 044 in tank

Gizzmo EBC

oh and lots of boost ;) (23psi)

standard internals? 23psi??

what's with people running massive boost on un-opened engines?? i think hamish is like 23psi as well on his 33?? :P

The pressure from pre-ignition is far greater, since E85 doesnt have that problem should be fine! I've seen Lee's car hold 30 psi on the road on a cold night, that was radical!

Edited by 180or200

well i would presume (based upon what ive read) due to detonation and all, with e85 which dies off once it hits its top end of power instead of detonation that it would be much safer to push more boost without the knock.

although...i may just be wrong.

people still think that E85 is the ticket to more safe power. This is not the case! you are still limited to the engines internals.

it is easier and safer to make the power but if you are using standard internals or have a weak engine it will still break.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I neglected to respond to this previously. Get it up to 100 psi, and then you'll be OK.
    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
×
×
  • Create New...