Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The only thing you have to worry about, apart from the tyres sticking out of the guards is rolling diameter.... you can go +15mm or

-26mm

Pages 10 and 11 has the info.

http://www.transport.qld.gov.au/resources/...r_vehicles2.pdf

and to calculate u can use..

http://www.dakota-truck.net/TIRECALC/tirecalc.html

I might be totally wrong and probably am lol but i didnt think you were allowed to increase overall track by more than an inch. Don't even know if the GTR rims will do that, but might be worth looking into...

I was thinking of doing the same thing to my GTT so would be keen to know if it is ligit!

PS drift barbie - I have an aftermarket ecu, what were u wanting to know? and yes i know u werent asking me :P

The problem you'll have is that they do protrude ever so slightly from the front guards.

lowering, camber + skinnier tyres will fix that :)

But yes as someone mentioned above, as long as OD is not more than 15mm and wheels/tyres do not sit past the guards you are fine. This is for QLD.

You will however find a large majority of hardcore wannabe drifters think of you as a softc*&k for asking the question though because to them if its not hella flush (wheels stickin 50m outside the guards) you are an epic fail.

I've seen plenty of 34GTTs run 34GTR wheels....legal or not legal depends on the mood of the day. I would class it as very mildly illegal.

yeah pretty sure you can't go wider than 30mm from the standard tyre,

bingo...

You can increase the diameter of the rim as far as you want as long as its no bigger than the original OEM delievered diameter including the tyre...

The statement below is true also when refering to the above line... This is the max varience allowed when changing the profile of the tyre to suit...

you can go +15mm or

-26mm

col, i think he may have been meaning the width of the tyre, rather than the diameter. the widest you can go is 1.3 times the widest option stock tyre that was available on that car. so even if the car came with a widest optional tyre of 225 you could still run 285 tyres (1.3 x 225 comes out at 293 so you could probably get away with 295s)

the other thing you have to take into account is that changing in your track. you can increase the track by up to 26mm, but can't reduce it at all. so that means that gtr wheels won't actually be legal because they have a lower offset. and before people start saying that they came on the same generation car, the gtr runs different track to the gt-t. the front is the same but the rear is different (it's wider), so putting the gtr wheels on will reduce the track. however if the gtr is listed on the same tyre placard (sticker just inside the door) as the gt-t then you could get away with it.

col, i think he may have been meaning the width of the tyre, rather than the diameter. the widest you can go is 1.3 times the widest option stock tyre that was available on that car. so even if the car came with a widest optional tyre of 225 you could still run 285 tyres (1.3 x 225 comes out at 293 so you could probably get away with 295s)

Sorta, I didnt explain myself very clear... But in short you can run 17" rims on a car that came out with 14's if you want...

As long as the overall diameter of the tyre is no bigger than the OEM product...

As there is slight difference always the DOT came up with a suitable legal variance...

you can go +15mm or -26mm

I stated 30mm, meaning an R34 GTT can run up to 255 without being much of a problem in terms of sticking out etc...

That said however it depends on the size of the rim as the profile size will change the first number factor...

As for width yes there are some loop holes as to running even wider rubber, however there are other factors that usually stop you from doing so...

You cant run rubber wider than you guards, if it sticks out its illegal (hence offset of rims is so important)...

Also I should point out the rubber sticking out is really down to the kindness of the officer as to whats right and whats wrong. Ive heard of a VE GTS (stock rubber) being booked by police in QLD for having rims and tyres that are aparently illegal by DOT standards. These were factory fitting rims and tyres, so even if legal cops can still put you through the hoops if they want...

The legal line is quite clear in here as posted the other week...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 12+ months passed so they have no obligation to do a warranty claim. It leaked from the rear circuit. Front circuit was fine, but I tried many times to bench-bleed and in-car bleed (wasted 1L of Penrite racing brake fluid) to no avail. Threw my old BM50 or whatever the standard R32 GT-R BMC is, brakes went back to normal. So from my very limited anecdotal experience, I cannot recommend HFM, even though a lot of their products looks good. Just my experience (I have a genuine Nissan BM57 in a box waiting to be installed now).
    • How dare you sell your unreliable Skyline and buy a reliable, Toyota/Yamaha car with a strong gearbox, torsen LSD and Toyota reliability. At least you won't need to worry about oil pumps, big catch can, oil restrictors, blowing off power steering belts, sheering off 3rd gear, failing ABS relays/pumps, etc.
    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
×
×
  • Create New...