Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok I did a bit of a search. couldn't find anything. I'm looking at doing some work on my car, has an r32 spec rb25de-t in it.

Looking at putting in an aftermarket ecu and injectors. Wanted to know if anyone had any recommendations on injectors? Brands and size. Currently the car is putting out about 215kw at 18psi on stock injectors, with supporting mods to get it to this stage.

At this stage I don't think I'd want to go past 250-260kw. So would some 550cc or so injectors suffice? If so any good or bad experiences with different brands? Bit of a noob when it comes to injectors.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/243032-injectors-recommendations/
Share on other sites

Do the R32 RB25DE's use top feed injectors ? Someone did tell me that the top and R33 side feed rails are interchangable with the top feed ones .

I think the Nismo SF 555's or 740's are high resistance saturated injectors so not sure what you'd do with an R32 .

A .

Nismo 555's or 550's (cant remember the size fo RB25's)

They are bigger than you need.

You could get away with GTR 440's adapted to fit and they would be fine. (bit of dicking around)

I believe s15's are 440 and a straight fit, they pop up in a set of 6 from time to time.

After the research i have done a good guide is that whatever horsepower your looking for thats the cc of the injectors you want plus a little more for headroom, the horsepower your after is 350, standards are 370cc so it does not leave you with much head room, next size up would be the S15 440cc, another thing you also need to take into account is once you have 260rwkw will you want more?

Not so long ago i would have been more than happy with the 220rwkw i have now, but things have changed, if you can see this being the case it might be worthwhile going 550cc so you dont have to do another change when your pushing for 300-350rwkw.

Edited by W0rp3D

rule ive heard for minimum injector size is:

divide engine hp (rough figure) by no. of cylinders to get hp per cyl, and you need 5-6 cc fuel per hp

so for you say you want about 400bhp

400hp/6 = 6.667 x 6 = 400cc, plus fudge factor = 500cc injectors

but most of the stuff ive read says its better to go bigger, a good tune should iron out the problem of using oversize injectors, plus it gives u room to make more power with out buying another set of injectors

rule ive heard for minimum injector size is:

divide engine hp (rough figure) by no. of cylinders to get hp per cyl, and you need 5-6 cc fuel per hp

so for you say you want about 400bhp

400hp/6 = 6.667 x 6 = 400cc, plus fudge factor = 500cc injectors

but most of the stuff ive read says its better to go bigger, a good tune should iron out the problem of using oversize injectors, plus it gives u room to make more power with out buying another set of injectors

LOL thats a lot of maths to agree with the theory that if you want 400rwhp that you should go 400cc injectors plus a bit more for head room.

yeh i know, just illustrating the point that its a 6 cyl car, and u need 6 cc per hp

just happend to turn out that way, the rule works for V8 and 4s aswell, then you would be dividing by 8 or 4, then mult by 6

Edited by Kranker
Anybody seen what they can get out of GTR 440cc injs on 4bar base pressure? By my calcs you would be able to see almost 350rwkw.

But gtr injectors are top feed and this application requires side feed.

  • 1 month later...
LOL thats a lot of maths to agree with the theory that if you want 400rwhp that you should go 400cc injectors plus a bit more for head room.

Yes, but your method doesn't take into account the number of cylinders. Which is predominantly fine considering this is a skylines forum, but you get my point.

If you had a 4cylinder engine and you wanted 400rwhp, you'd have to multiply by 1.5 to get an injector size (600cc) plus a bit more for head room.

Krankers method,

400hp/4cyl = 100hp/cyl

100hp/cyl * 6cc/hp = 600cc/cyl (plus fudge factor)

Same sh*t, different smell.

I wouldn't bother trying to retrofit GTR injectors when the S15 injectors are rated the same (if not higher, depends who you talk to) and are sidefeed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...