Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Originally posted by franks

a 4 door skyline! :)

OH YER!!!!

i dont know how you 2 door boys survive

4 doors is the key!

if pushed, i guess i could go for a wrx wagon, but it just wouldnt be the same

dunno what you pay for comprehensive insurance but mine is only 1400 bux a year

that aint too bad

Originally posted by CerealKiller

Audi RS4 - hands down the best station wagon ever made!

For those that don't know it's an 6 cylinder DOHC twin turbo intercooled monster (sound familiar?)  

power wise it's 280kW@6100rpm and 440Nm@2500rpm

0-100 in 4.9.

not bad for a "family" car :)

edit: forgot it's 6speed manual and AWD :)

there's an RS6 which is basically the same, just not a station wagon.

Wtf? Did you miss the bit where he said "$25k"?

Ahhhh the S2 I dremt about that one for ages. But you will need ~$40k and the fact that there are only ~30 in the whole country probably wont help.

And they use porsche brakes.... which cost a mint to replace.

I think you best bet is an A4 1.8l Turbo Quattro..... just happens to be my exact car :)

You need the B5 1.8L, you need the Quattro.

Basically comes in 2 specs

1996 - DONT GET, hard to chip the ECU

1997<1999.5 (could call series 1 110 kw)

1999.5<2002 (could call series 2 132 kw) updated minor things, a little nicer looking all round.

Dont be suckered in by the apparent lack of power of the Series 1, as once you chip both engines, the 2 cars have very similar performance. ~150kw @ 1 BAR. It has a little meatier torque than the WRX so should match a stock one. (need to grab 3rd gear to get 0-100 vs rex 2nd) so 0-100 times are decieving.

You can get insurance for <2k, try that with a rex....

I slightly overpaid for my car i think, it cost ~$34. Im sure you could get a 97' with no leather, sunroof and stock wheels for ~25-27 depending on how good you bargain. MAKE SURE ITS THE TURBO QUATTRO (this comes with sport suspension)

FYI, The current model A4 is the B6.

I forgot to mention, dont buy a euro unless you have emergency cash lying around.... apparently a replacement dual mass clutch + flywheel for the a4 can cost ~$3k

Friends have owned euro cars and have to agree with the cost of parts.

Dont know about the LS400, but a friend had an ES300, and another a Mazda 929, and another a Honda Legend. All very nice cars. So i imagine the LS400 would be nicer again, with a nice V8 soundtrack, RWD... i think you may be on the money.

Fo what its worth my buck fifty is either an A4, Volvo T5, or a Lexus, based purely on the value of the buy.

(leaning towards the LS400... thats a stroke of genius... a friend is looking at a 2nd hand accord for his wife, ill have to get in his ear about an LS400)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
    • Hmmm, interesting. Makes me wonder whether there is bias as well. It's the cheapest fuel, so it is used for all kinds of ill-maintained shitboxes which are bound to have issues regardless. Nicer cars tend to require higher octane rated fuel and can't use it anyway. FWIW, the official NSW E10 facts page is decent. 
×
×
  • Create New...