Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt35r Vs Garrett T04z - Discussion (just Post In This Thread To Create A Database)


Recommended Posts

I believe that plot is for cerbera (the other simon), not quite as full on as the original.

Agree T04GTR, my 35r is far from boring (esp rwd) but it doesnt compare to the nothing nothing bang and scream to the limiter of a mates hks t04z - but he is cheating with a jun stroker :P he also has awd so its not a very fair comparison I spose.

I believe that plot is for cerbera (the other simon), not quite as full on as the original.

Agree T04GTR, my 35r is far from boring (esp rwd) but it doesnt compare to the nothing nothing bang and scream to the limiter of a mates hks t04z - but he is cheating with a jun stroker :P he also has awd so its not a very fair comparison I spose.

Ahh fair enough :)

My GT35R should be on in a month or so and I will post the tyre frying results :(

I believe that plot is for cerbera (the other simon), not quite as full on as the original.

Agree T04GTR, my 35r is far from boring (esp rwd) but it doesnt compare to the nothing nothing bang and scream to the limiter of a mates hks t04z - but he is cheating with a jun stroker :down: he also has awd so its not a very fair comparison I spose.

come on i was carrying an extra 400kg than you too so i think the stroker is fair :P Pity u never took me for a spin to compare it though, looks like i'll have to wait a while

Simon aka R32-GTS is who DCIEVE is talking about (I think :)). Too much headwork to compare to any old 26 with a T04Z

It's Cerberas graph.

I used that one instead of Natallottos because Cerbera has no head porting, and just mild 270 degree cams.

The 35R has been scaled 5% to take into account its on a hubber.

It's the closest thing I could get to a fair comparisson between the two, and subsequently, I've just purchased a 35R.

hey how did yours come up michael? obviously happy with the results!

here is a link to our car running a HKS TO4Z setup at the Bathurst sprint a few weeks ago, overall the results we pretty good but takes abit to get use to as we are use to running small twin setups.

we limited boost to 25psi which made approx 430 awkw's on the rollers, fiddled with cams a fair bit whiched helped the middle alot, i think full boost was around 4700 - 4800.

http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=lf6opg6Mdt0

cheers russ

p.s i prefer more response, but the single rush was good too. wouldnt be as much fun on a tight track

Spoolup has a to4z on his rb30det.

There's a few dyno sheets on the link below.

http://www.spoolimports.com/content/SpoolImportsR33.asp

R34 NEO head - HKS 272 / 9.35 cams, Performance Valve Springs

Garrett T04Z turbo 0.96 ex housing

23psi 581rwhp.

The boosts knee so to speak appears to be a little after 4000rpm.

A pair of 272 10.5mm lift cams would work much better on his setup.

As for a GT35 pushing more than a genuine 400rwkw (535rwhp) on the RB with pump fuel. I'm not a believer. :)

Edited by TheRogue
As for a GT35 pushing more than a genuine 400rwkw (535rwhp) on the RB with pump fuel. I'm not a believer. :D

Thats unfortunate, it has been done time and time again and all going well I'll hopefully be able to post a plot for another one in a month.

It's Cerberas graph.

I used that one instead of Natallottos because Cerbera has no head porting, and just mild 270 degree cams.

The 35R has been scaled 5% to take into account its on a hubber.

It's the closest thing I could get to a fair comparisson between the two, and subsequently, I've just purchased a 35R.

From the horses mouth :D

My 35R is so close to being on I can feel the happiness in my pants stirring :D

hey how did yours come up michael? obviously happy with the results!

here is a link to our car running a HKS TO4Z setup at the Bathurst sprint a few weeks ago, overall the results we pretty good but takes abit to get use to as we are use to running small twin setups.

we limited boost to 25psi which made approx 430 awkw's on the rollers, fiddled with cams a fair bit whiched helped the middle alot, i think full boost was around 4700 - 4800.

http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=lf6opg6Mdt0

cheers russ

p.s i prefer more response, but the single rush was good too. wouldnt be as much fun on a tight track

Hey Russ,

yep we are only running 20psi at the moment, 330kw, fair way short of the big T04Z. havent touched the cams. full boost around 4300rpm. Will get to QR at the first Timeattack and see how it goes.

I'm thinking down the track try some fuel and 26psi. :D

Maybe for superlap!! :D

we limited boost to 25psi which made approx 430 awkw's on the rollers, fiddled with cams a fair bit whiched helped the middle alot, i think full boost was around 4700 - 4800

Sounds almost like he'd have been happier with a GT35R :D I'm pretty sure that power would be achieveable with 25psi on race gas, and in my experience a GT35R feels a bit more lively underfoot than a pair of GT2860-5s.

yeah, I'm thinking 26psi and some good fuel, I should touch up 400kw on the 2.6 35R combo. will look at that hopefully for superlap! :D

Between the gears, down low it's just awesome. Can't wait to put more boost into it, I'm sure it will come alive.

defo, would be great

post the link! :)

not that we want to go too off topic, but heres my on-car footage.

http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=g8aiGRO5Ifk

yeah, i just think the 35 is boring compared to t04z, besides hks doesnt do a gt35 equivalent.... lagmaster ftw. :)

Correct. The closest thing that HKS have to a GT35R is the GT3240 (rated by HKS at 580hp), which is a GT35R with a cut-back rear wheel and 0.87 housing ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...