Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt35r Vs Garrett T04z - Discussion (just Post In This Thread To Create A Database)


Recommended Posts

Did Paul tune your car? Is that the Twin scroll or just a single entry? Have to let me know how responsive it is etc

yes, twin scroll...

Not super responsive, not that you can complain 400kw & 2.6L would never be. 4,***rpm (haven't been driving it much) until it starts pulling hard..

It's definitely use-able when you put in the effort & keep it at high revs..

35R mate :rant:

Getting greedy are we......35R is suited to a 3L imo, is yours 3L cant remember?????Altho my mates 25 with a 3582 is pretty awsome (top end to burn) i'm sure you will be more than happy.

Still a 2.5L.

It was a hard decision and something i thought alot about. Ill give away about 400-500rpm in response but will be close to making 600rwhp.

Should be finished with the swap (amongst other things) late Jan.

Good luck with it Nytsky, you have spent the money where it counts so i'm sure you will get the results your after.......Keep us all posted on the results won't ya.

lol there are so many things wrong with that dyno graph i dont even know where to start

lol wow... its like... a dyno run in reverse the graph is that poor... dear me. I'd be sacking that tuner!

Still a 2.5L.

It was a hard decision and something i thought alot about. Ill give away about 400-500rpm in response but will be close to making 600rwhp.

Nice! Will be good to see how it goes, especially if you go the E85 path again. With a twin scroll T4 GT35R you'll probably lose very little response.... I'm kindof umming and ahhing about go that way :D

lol wow... its like... a dyno run in reverse the graph is that poor... dear me. I'd be sacking that tuner!

WOW is right...

I think we just agreed on something, it might be a merry xmas after all :D

lol there are so many things wrong with that dyno graph i dont even know where to start
lol wow... its like... a dyno run in reverse the graph is that poor... dear me. I'd be sacking that tuner!

Yeah well it's never going to look like a proper run when it goes on the dyno with low compression....

won't be pulling it down till January but..

Even with low compression - on all 6 cyclinders?

WOW is right...

I think we just agreed on something, it might be a merry xmas after all :D

lol indeed :(

Nice! Will be good to see how it goes, especially if you go the E85 path again. With a twin scroll T4 GT35R you'll probably lose very little response.... I'm kindof umming and ahhing about go that way :D

Thats the way i wanted to go, TS GT35R. But id have to get a new manifold made and mod the dump a little. Would be a great combo though.

Due to cost and ease of change over i got the single entry .82 housing, with the new .70 surge slot cover :(

Basically a straight swap, using the same fittings and lines. And it will be on E85 of coarse.

Just for interest for those reading,

Max power per each of the below?

GT35 .63

GT35 .82

GT35 1.06

GT35 .78 TS

VS: T04z

T4_Divided .70

T4_Divided .84

T4_Divided 1.00

T4_Divided 1.15

T4_Divided 1.32

T4_Undivided .61

T4_Undivided .70

.81 A/R T4 Undivided with 3" V-Band outlet

.96 A/R T4 Undivided with 3" V-Band outlet

Well... here it is...

This is as even of a comparison as we could manage. Bolted off a GT35R (red line) and bolted on a T04Z (blue line).

Graph makes it seem like its a laggy bitch, and the T04Z setup is shit... to be honest I'm not sure yet. The Z is so much fun, but not sure if it'll be faster than the 35R on the track (I doubt it). May end up going back to a 35R at some stage, but going to enjoy the extra top end for the time being...

beii5j.jpg

RPM limit was increase to 8500 to account for the extra 500+ rpm of lag.

Would be a lot better if the wastegate wasn't shit and ramped as hard as it should...

Edited by Brockas

Ye i was going to say it looks like boost control could use some improvements - but at least its using the same boost control setup through both runs.

You really should get that fixed, would make a very noticeable gain :)

GT35 FTW! :D

great to see the back to back result, would bee good to see the power the gt35 would make with the same amount of boost as the to4z.

Interesting to see it lost 110 HP through the midrange to gain only 80hp top end.

If the gt35 didnt taper off boost so much in the higher revs the top end power figures would be alot closer.

Edited by sky30

Would have been good if the boost levels were identical......and your wastegate woes fixed ..........for a true back to back comparo.

Great comparison anyway for the purposes of this thread.

GT35 Wins !

At the same boost level that top end power gap would be less.

Interesting that you changed the limiter too ?

I assume thats to give you a bit more power band.

Engine life would now be reduced.

Mind you, all that said. The top end power of the Z would be damn sweeeeet :)

Using the same boost level is i dunno, arguable.

Remember the turbo's have different areas of efficiency and so on.

Best of running them both where they both perform best and comparing off that IMO.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, it's getting like that, my daughter is coming over on Thursday to help me remove the bonnet so I can install the Carbuilders underbonnet stuff,  I might get her to give me a hand and remove the hardtop, maybe, because on really hot days the detachable hardtop helps the aircon keep the interior cool, the heat just punches straight through to rag top I also don't have enough hair for the "wind in the hair" experience, so there is that....LOL
    • Could be falling edge/rising edge is set wrong. Are you getting sync errors?
    • On BMWs what I do because I'm more confident that I can't instantly crush the pinch welds and do thousands of USD in chassis damage is use a set of rubber jacking pads designed to protect the chassis/plastic adapter and raise a corner of the car, place the aforementioned 2x12 inch wooden planks under a tire, drop the car, then this normally gives me enough clearance to get to the front central jack point. If you don't need it to be a ramp it only needs to be 1-1.5 feet long. On my R33 I do not trust the pinch welds to tolerate any of this so I drive up on the ramps. Before then when I had to get a new floor jack that no longer cleared the front lip I removed it to get enough clearance to put the jack under it. Once you're on the ramps once you simply never let the car down to the ground. It lives on the ramps or on jack stands.
    • Nah. You need 2x taps for anything that you cannot pass the tap all the way through. And even then, there's a point in response to the above which I will come back to. The 2x taps are 1x tapered for starting, and 1x plug tap for working to the bottom of blind holes. That block's port is effectively a blind hole from the perspective of the tap. The tapered tap/tapered thread response. You don't ever leave a female hole tapered. They are supposed to be parallel, hence the wide section of a tapered tap being parallel, the existince of plug taps, etc. The male is tapered so that it will eventually get too fat for the female thread, and yes, there is some risk if the tapped length of the female hole doesn't offer enough threads, that it will not lock up very nicely. But you can always buzz off the extra length on the male thread, and the tape is very good at adding bulk to the joint.
    • Nice....looking forward to that update
×
×
  • Create New...