Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt35r Vs Garrett T04z - Discussion (just Post In This Thread To Create A Database)


Recommended Posts

Did Paul tune your car? Is that the Twin scroll or just a single entry? Have to let me know how responsive it is etc

yes, twin scroll...

Not super responsive, not that you can complain 400kw & 2.6L would never be. 4,***rpm (haven't been driving it much) until it starts pulling hard..

It's definitely use-able when you put in the effort & keep it at high revs..

35R mate :rant:

Getting greedy are we......35R is suited to a 3L imo, is yours 3L cant remember?????Altho my mates 25 with a 3582 is pretty awsome (top end to burn) i'm sure you will be more than happy.

Still a 2.5L.

It was a hard decision and something i thought alot about. Ill give away about 400-500rpm in response but will be close to making 600rwhp.

Should be finished with the swap (amongst other things) late Jan.

Good luck with it Nytsky, you have spent the money where it counts so i'm sure you will get the results your after.......Keep us all posted on the results won't ya.

lol there are so many things wrong with that dyno graph i dont even know where to start

lol wow... its like... a dyno run in reverse the graph is that poor... dear me. I'd be sacking that tuner!

Still a 2.5L.

It was a hard decision and something i thought alot about. Ill give away about 400-500rpm in response but will be close to making 600rwhp.

Nice! Will be good to see how it goes, especially if you go the E85 path again. With a twin scroll T4 GT35R you'll probably lose very little response.... I'm kindof umming and ahhing about go that way :D

lol wow... its like... a dyno run in reverse the graph is that poor... dear me. I'd be sacking that tuner!

WOW is right...

I think we just agreed on something, it might be a merry xmas after all :D

lol there are so many things wrong with that dyno graph i dont even know where to start
lol wow... its like... a dyno run in reverse the graph is that poor... dear me. I'd be sacking that tuner!

Yeah well it's never going to look like a proper run when it goes on the dyno with low compression....

won't be pulling it down till January but..

Even with low compression - on all 6 cyclinders?

WOW is right...

I think we just agreed on something, it might be a merry xmas after all :D

lol indeed :(

Nice! Will be good to see how it goes, especially if you go the E85 path again. With a twin scroll T4 GT35R you'll probably lose very little response.... I'm kindof umming and ahhing about go that way :D

Thats the way i wanted to go, TS GT35R. But id have to get a new manifold made and mod the dump a little. Would be a great combo though.

Due to cost and ease of change over i got the single entry .82 housing, with the new .70 surge slot cover :(

Basically a straight swap, using the same fittings and lines. And it will be on E85 of coarse.

Just for interest for those reading,

Max power per each of the below?

GT35 .63

GT35 .82

GT35 1.06

GT35 .78 TS

VS: T04z

T4_Divided .70

T4_Divided .84

T4_Divided 1.00

T4_Divided 1.15

T4_Divided 1.32

T4_Undivided .61

T4_Undivided .70

.81 A/R T4 Undivided with 3" V-Band outlet

.96 A/R T4 Undivided with 3" V-Band outlet

Well... here it is...

This is as even of a comparison as we could manage. Bolted off a GT35R (red line) and bolted on a T04Z (blue line).

Graph makes it seem like its a laggy bitch, and the T04Z setup is shit... to be honest I'm not sure yet. The Z is so much fun, but not sure if it'll be faster than the 35R on the track (I doubt it). May end up going back to a 35R at some stage, but going to enjoy the extra top end for the time being...

beii5j.jpg

RPM limit was increase to 8500 to account for the extra 500+ rpm of lag.

Would be a lot better if the wastegate wasn't shit and ramped as hard as it should...

Edited by Brockas

Ye i was going to say it looks like boost control could use some improvements - but at least its using the same boost control setup through both runs.

You really should get that fixed, would make a very noticeable gain :)

GT35 FTW! :D

great to see the back to back result, would bee good to see the power the gt35 would make with the same amount of boost as the to4z.

Interesting to see it lost 110 HP through the midrange to gain only 80hp top end.

If the gt35 didnt taper off boost so much in the higher revs the top end power figures would be alot closer.

Edited by sky30

Would have been good if the boost levels were identical......and your wastegate woes fixed ..........for a true back to back comparo.

Great comparison anyway for the purposes of this thread.

GT35 Wins !

At the same boost level that top end power gap would be less.

Interesting that you changed the limiter too ?

I assume thats to give you a bit more power band.

Engine life would now be reduced.

Mind you, all that said. The top end power of the Z would be damn sweeeeet :)

Using the same boost level is i dunno, arguable.

Remember the turbo's have different areas of efficiency and so on.

Best of running them both where they both perform best and comparing off that IMO.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
    • If they can dyno them, get them dyno'd, make sure they're not leaking, and if they look okay on the dyno and are performing relatively well, put them in the car.   If they're leaking oil etc, and you feel so inclined, open them up yourself and see what you can do to fix it. The main thing you're trying to do is replace the parts that perish, like seals. You're not attempting to change the valving. You might even be able to find somewhere that has the Tein parts/rebuild kit if you dig hard.
    • Can you also make sure the invoices on the box (And none exist in the boxes) are below our import duty limits... I jest, there's nothing I need to actually purchase and order in. (Unless you can find me a rear diff carrier, brand new, for stupidly cheap, that is for a Toyota Landcruiser, HZJ105R GXL, 2000 year model...)  
×
×
  • Create New...