Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt35r Vs Garrett T04z - Discussion (just Post In This Thread To Create A Database)


Recommended Posts

my t04z is a split pulse t4 flange - same as the GT3788. The 4088R is a bigger turbo than the T04Z (compressor and turbine) so it will flow more HP, with a tiny bit more lag.

Main reason for doing the swap is simply that the Z is too doughy out of medium tight corners around the track. IE: turns 3/4 @ QR I take at about 80km/hr. 2nd gear == massive tailslide on exit, whilst 3rd gear == LAG all the way out of the corner. Hopefully the new turbo is not only slightly more responsive, but a lot more linear in power delivery. I make 1 bar at 4100rpm with the Z and 24psi at 4500. Thats not too laggy, but as soon as you go below 4000 rpm there is absolutely nothing there. I wouldnt care too much if the 3788 only makes 1 bar at 4000rpm as long as 3800/3900 still had SOMETHING available unlike the Z which comes on like a lightswitch once you get over 4.

The only unfortuante thing is that I wont be able to directly compare how the 2 turbo's would have worked on the track as I'm making some other significant changes to the car at the same time. So wont be able to say if the 3788 is soley responsible for better lap times, but hopefully combined with everything else we are doing it makes a big difference.

Still probably a couple of weeks away from doing the swap - will see how we go.

What else are you doing mate!?!?!!?!?!?

Is it going to be ready for the 11th?

We are going to run high boost on the T04z this time and see what we can times we can squeeze out of it.

Hopefully the new balancer will keep all the belts on the car unlike last times sad effort!

#### Couldnt edit my first abortion of a sentence.

this should make more sense

What else are you doing mate!?!?!!?!?!?

Is it going to be ready for the 11th?

We are going to run high boost on the T04z this time and see what times we can squeeze out of it.

Hopefully the new balancer will keep all the belts on the car unlike last times sad effort!

What else are you doing mate!?!?!!?!?!?

Is it going to be ready for the 11th?

We are going to run high boost on the T04z this time and see what we can times we can squeeze out of it.

Hopefully the new balancer will keep all the belts on the car unlike last times sad effort!

Oh few bits and pieces. Got some softer suspension going in as the 12kg springs that were on there were way to hard. The car will definitely be there on the 11th even if i have to push the damn thing around the track :D

hopefully catcha then ! Look forward to seeing what you can do with the good ole Z :P

Oh few bits and pieces. Got some softer suspension going in as the 12kg springs that were on there were way to hard. The car will definitely be there on the 11th even if i have to push the damn thing around the track :banana:

hopefully catcha then ! Look forward to seeing what you can do with the good ole Z :P

Nice mate,

Looking forward to seeing your new setup in action!

The 4088R is a bigger turbo than the T04Z (compressor and turbine) so it will flow more HP, with a tiny bit more lag.

I make 1 bar at 4100rpm with the Z and 24psi at 4500. Thats not too laggy, but as soon as you go below 4000 rpm there is absolutely nothing there. I wouldnt care too much if the 3788 only makes 1 bar at 4000rpm as long as 3800/3900 still had SOMETHING available unlike the Z which comes on like a lightswitch once you get over 4.

Wont be able to say if the 3788 is soley responsible for better lap times, but hopefully combined with everything else we are doing it makes a big difference.

Are you running an RB30? 1bar at 4100rpm isn't that bad :thumbsup:

Strictly speaking the GT4088R isn't really a bigger turbo than the T04Z, the T04Z has a bigger compressor which wants to flow a bit more air - the Supra guys in the States and the UK seem to be increasingly moving from the T04Z to the GT4088R as the fun 700+ish turbo to have, the GT4088R is apparently more useable and generally fun.

Look forward to hearing how the GT3788R treats you, I've never heard of one used on a petrol motor.

Are you running an RB30? 1bar at 4100rpm isn't that bad :thumbsup:

sounds like rb26 response.... in 4th gear on a flat road loading up the motor i was getting 1bar around 3700rpm on my stock capacity rb26

Smoking Crack whilst driving helps Cerbera think the boost is coming on sooner.

Also Cerbs .... 139mph last night with a GT35 !!

ANDRA guy got angry and told me to get a chute ..... jeeeeeez never ends !

Good job, I guessed your weight at 2800lb?s and put your run in the Power calculator and it came up at 560hp so the numbers sound right.

http://www.turbofast.com.au/Drag.html

Reasonable guide but remember its engine power. Im surprised just how close this has been.

dam id love to see a skyline run 139 at the plex, where are u getting ur E85 from in perth?

silvia even

Edited by ahh 33 s2

Running 1000cc injectors and low rail pressure. It gets to 90%.

Not sure how the pump would fair on higher rail pressure but in theory a lot more injector available.

Are you running an RB30? 1bar at 4100rpm isn't that bad :P

Strictly speaking the GT4088R isn't really a bigger turbo than the T04Z, the T04Z has a bigger compressor which wants to flow a bit more air - the Supra guys in the States and the UK seem to be increasingly moving from the T04Z to the GT4088R as the fun 700+ish turbo to have, the GT4088R is apparently more useable and generally fun.

Look forward to hearing how the GT3788R treats you, I've never heard of one used on a petrol motor.

Yea, the compressors of the 2 turbo's are fairly similar in the scheme of things ->

TO4Z

Inducer 66.7mm

Exducer 84.0mm

Turbine: 74.2mm

4088R

Inducer 63.5mm

Exducer 88.0mm

Turbine: 77.0mm

Doesn't the exducer determine how much air it can flow ? People seem to be getting a bit more HP out of the 4088's than the Z's.. the fin design of the new garrett turbo's is more efficient than the older Z's.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Has equal chance of cleaning an AFM and f**king an AFM. I think you can work out what happened. When the Hitachi ECU sees the AFM die and goes into the associated limp mode, then it will start and run just fine, because it ignores the AFM and just runs on idle maps that will do what it needs to get it going. But there is no proper load signal, so that's about all it can do. My suggestion? If you don't want to go full aftermaket ECU, then get some R35 GTR AFM cards and some housings to put them in, in the stock location, and Nistune the ECU. Better to do a good upgrade than just replace shitty 40 year old tech with the same 40 year old tech.
    • So my car was recently having trouble starting on initial crank, I would need to feather the gas for it to start up but besides that it would start and run fine. So I clicked the idle air control valve (with throttle body cleaner) and cleaned the MAF sensors (with MAF cleaner). The start up issue was fixed and now the car turns over without the assist of the throttle, but the car is in limp mode and wont rev past 2.5k RPM. From what I understand the IACV would not put the car in limp mode, so I am to believe it is the MAF sensors, but it was running fine before and now I cant get it out of limp mode. I cleaned the MAF made sure the o rings were seated properly. Made sure the cables were plugged in properly, the cables also both read the same voltage. Does anybody know why this is or what could be causing this or how to get it out of limp mode?
    • Ooo I might actually come and bring the kids, however will leave the shit box home and take the daily
    • Thanks. Yeah I realised that there's no way I'd be able to cover the holes with the filler, it would just fall through. Thanks again @GTSBoy!
    • That was the reason I asked. If you were going to be fully bodge spec, then that type of filler is the extreme bodge way to fill a large gap. But seeing as you're going to use glass sheet, I would only use that fibre reinforced filler if there are places that need a "bit more" after you've finished laying in the sheet. Which, ideally, you wouldn't. You might use a blob of it underneath the sheet, if you need to provide some support from under to keep the level of your sheet repair up as high as it needs to be, to minimise the amount of filler you need on top. Even though you're going bodge spec here, using glass instead of metal, the same rules apply wrt not having half inch deep filler on the top of the repair. Thick filler always ends up shitting the bed earlier than thin filler.
×
×
  • Create New...