Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey All...

As title says, i need info on head gaskets on Rb25's...

I'm looking to produce between 250-280 rwkws, but i'm unsure if i have to change the head gasket?

Some people say it's fine and you don't need to crack the head open, but i want a reliable 25.

If i do need to change gaskets... what type of gasket should i be looking for? what thickness, without loosing too much compression and driveability?

Help is muchly appreciated

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/246346-changing-head-gasket-on-rb25det/
Share on other sites

If you still decide to change your head gasket, get a Cometic 1.2 or 1.3mm by 87mm, you wont lose too much compression if any.. also id recommend getting the ARP head studs, i am in the process of changing mine at the moment.. :P

Metal headgaskets are more likely to hold together and not blow out when there is a bit of detonation due to the increased strength from the metal walls around the cylinder, a standard one will usually blow out but will hopefully save your engine. Think about it as the weakest link in a chain giving out first.

The reason many people change to a metal one is due to the larger thicknesses available so they can lower compression. Lowering compression usually means that you can put more timing into the engine on the same boost level without it knocking, in essence usually making more power. However with lower compression you will sacrifice some bottom end power and boost response.

Hence if you don't need to replace it with a thicker size, then just replace it with a standard one. There is a lot more to this and i cant be bothered writing it all, but unless you are putting through a lot of boost and timing with over 300kw, there is no great reason to swap to a metal one unless you want to lower compression or if you have a strong built engine and know the metal gasket will still probably let go before a rod.

So I don't need to change the head gasket yet as the power figure for next year will be about 260-280rwkw, thanks for the advice. I was about to do it this winter while the car is standing in the garage.

I'll change the metal gasket later, at the same time with the forged internals when we are going after more power.

  • 10 years later...
On 11/26/2008 at 7:22 AM, joeyjoejoejuniorshabadoo said:

how much bottom end loss are we talking?

i'm thinking about doing this as my head is coming off to fit an oil restrictor and custom oil return lines

i am digging up an old thread, but im also wondering the same thing - as golbys sell the 1.3mm gasket and head bolts together it must be a common combo?

Edited by Unkn0wn
cant spell

 

Well, if you're pulling the head off then you HAVE to replace the gasket.  So you might as well put a decent MLS one in there.  But be aware of the surface prep/finish requirements.

Also, don't put a thicker HG in there if your aim is to reduce the compression.  That's '90s thinking.

ive pulled mine off and put a cometic mls gasket in and arp bolts and now it leaks water into cylinder 2.  both attempts to use mls and the same thing water in cylinder 2, both head and deck straight. 

now putting a genuine gasket back in. moral to the story, get head and deck machined to mirror finish quality !!

24 minutes ago, bilk06169 said:

ive pulled mine off and put a cometic mls gasket in and arp bolts and now it leaks water into cylinder 2.  both attempts to use mls and the same thing water in cylinder 2, both head and deck straight. 

now putting a genuine gasket back in. moral to the story, get head and deck machined to mirror finish quality !!

you can use a Tomei headgasket, as they're o-ringed - same with the Nitto ones. Cometic requires you to deck the block and the head so they're perfectly flat.

Nothing wrong with Cometic, but it has it's requirements. I generally use and recommend Tomei ones.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The fab work can be as simple as a couple of silicon hoses and clamps to the factory piping. 
    • Just sounds like either way you need to do some fab work to get everything to fit, so why limit yourself at that point? If the GCG high flow option is zero effort in and out swap though I'd probably do that. It's almost certainly lowest risk, lowest cost, etc. The HKS GTIII-RS option that Kapr mentioned is laughably expensive for what it is, they charge the exact same for two turbos on the RB26 so their margins are off the charts on that thing.
    • Intake manifold is not a part of the issue. The turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold. That is easy. But close your eyes and picture the physical situation. That is a T3 flange on the manifold and a T3 flange on the turbo. As long as any new turbo has a T3 flange on the exhaust housing, that exhaust housing will bolt to the exhaust manifold. This places the exhaust housing in the same place as the stock one. But now move your mental attention a little further forward. The location of the compressor housing is set by the length of the turbo's core. The stock turbo had a long core. Let's say that it is..... 100mm long. So that would place the compressor housing 100mm forward of the exhaust housing. But a highflow, might well have a centre core that is shorter. Let's say that it is only 70mm long. Now the compressor housing will be 30mm further back in the engine bay than the stock one. This DOES move the turbo's compressor outlet backwards. It also moves the compressor's inlet backwards. You will very likely have to do some work to both the inlet and outlet piping to make everything connect again. I am not say this to make it out to be a bigger deal than it is. I am just pointing out that "bolt on" is sometimes not quite bolt on. The highflow from GCG that Murray linked above (https://gcg.com.au/turbo-charger-upgrade-skyline-gtst-2iu-xtrgts-s1.html ) uses a core that is the same length as the stock core, and so does not require this extra work. It will look very much like the stock turbo. No-one uses GTR turbos of any flavour (stock, or aftermarket) in a single turbo application on RB20/25. It's not a thing. Yes, people have been putting on GT3076, GTX3076 (and bigger and smaller versions of those) and G30s (of various sizes) onto RB20/25 since forever. But these are not "bolt on". Everything except the 4 bolts to the exhaust manifold change with these. And genuine Garretts are expensive. Non-gen, like Pulsar, etc, are cheaper, variously as good or nearly as good. But still not bolt on. No-one in the right mind would pay for an HKS turbo. Not in this modern day and age. Well, yes, the GCG highflow. You could ask HG what he can do to make the compressor housing sit in the original location. There are surely others doing highflows around the world. And some of the eBay/Temu ones (as reported by Dose) work and don't die. Bit of a lottery though. I would send your turbo to GCG (here in Oz) to be highflowed if you want a trivial no-extra-work option. But seriously, the work required to change inlet and outlet piping is not that hard. That's a boost control problem, not a turbo problem.
    • Thank you all for the replys 🙂 I know that intake would be different but that is one pipe at it is not that hard to get(custom one). I meant mainly bolt to the stock manifold and the turbo elbow. I looked and many sites/forums but they are just "old" with some old HKS turbos from GT-R i guess? What about some Garrets?  Or any other turbo? Is there even a turbo which i can just bolt on? 😄 And yeah i know about that new HKS but that is like 2000k USD without taxes/shipping in here   Iam getting a touch up tune but my "problem" is that on the "not" hot day iam getting peaks around 0,9 bar...and when it was around 15 Celsious i saw peak around 1 bar which is just too much for stock turbo. And of course turbo is old and i like to get some new one for a piece of mind 🙂 
    • I'm working on the assumption that our friend Jasmine here is a Russian (or, possibly Ukrainian) spammer/spambot, based purely on the number of such that I have been having to neuter in the last few weeks. IP address for the OP above was in WA. But that could have been via VPN. Posting at quarter to 4 in the morning is a good sign of being from somewhere in Europe. The last Jasmine that I kicked in the cooch was IP addressed in Ukraine. Even that could have been via VPN, and the bitchbot could have been from Russia, Serbia, China or anywhere. Regardless, was a spambot, so I killed it with fire. The fact that our new friend Jasmine here did not respond in any way to my tart query strongly suggests to me that this OP was just the establishment phase of a user able to be activated for spamming in a week, or 3 or 10.
×
×
  • Create New...