Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just a question for all you guys running round the 210 220 230rwkw mark on the rb20

how do you guys compete with the new V8's are they beatable in a drag?? with this power?

reason i ask is that i have around the 240rwkw mark but have a fairly big turbo and its lag city for me at the moment

but i do chomp em once on boost.... (this is at a drag strip for all you young ones)

i am downsizing my turbo and may only have round the 210 mark ( hard to say just yet )

Just wanna know how it will size up with less power i know my boost will come on around 1000rpm earlier but

the initial torque of a V8 will still be in front of my 32 off the line

Will i catch up still you reckon???

old V8's i know are no match but this is all i really care about with my car cause all my mates drive V8's

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/246366-r32-rb20-220-230kws-vs-new-v8s/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 131
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

im a big v8 fanboy so im going to go ahead and say that if you're talking about an 8 such as an ls2 out of a vz clubby or ve you will get pwned.

these things pull like all hell and the ls2's are known to have a much better torque curve compared to ls1's out of lets say a VX (stock offcourse). Yes the skyline will have the power coming on up the top (boost) but the newer 8's pull right from the bottom to past 6k and lets not forget its a 6speed too... i would have thought however that the whole catching up thing would be reversed... ie you charge off the line only to be past by the time you get to 2nd.

LS2 is a great engine no doubting it.

but it is pulling 1700kg +

1290kg RB20...

you have a 400kg advantage.

I don't understand how lag plays a roll in a drag race.

you launch at revs (so on boost on close) and once you are up in the 7000rpm + region, each shift brings you in to the sweet spot of boost and torque.

have a chat to ROY if he doesn't chime in here..

his car power ranges from 240 - 260rwkw depending on his tune at the time.

he's more in a circuit racing, but he may be able to give you some insight.

also, when you say lag city, give us some idea.

what is your 60 foot time?

what revs do you leave the line at?

does it bog down at launch?

does it fry the wheels at launch?

what turbo?

at what revs in 1st gear do you feel the turbo really gets up and going?

Roy mentioned that to get the best out of second gear he has to rev first up to over 8K (8200 or 8300 I seem to remember)

then shift from 2nd to third near 8000rpm again.

then from there he shifts around 7 or just over.

cef11e - another guy who had 243rwkw on his RB20 using a SLIDE hiflow.

he was seeing full boost (19psi) by 4300rpm.

how does your compare.

you really shouldnt have any trouble beating them.

im running an rb20 in a 180sx, when the motor was almost standard it was level pegging with a hsv R8.

now im running a 3071r and step 1 cams badly tuned and its still alot quicker then it was

done everything positive boost starts at like 3500 but it really doesnt pull at all until 5000 5500 then its like bang 7000 change

second gear wheel spin hits 7000 change

off boost but then comes on quick in third all the way to 7000 change

by that time its too fast to keep going but anyway change into fourth and its off boost for a bit then back on again

lol i like the nitrous shot that would be fun

im runnin 19psi

just if it bogs down is where im screwed really ay

so you guys reckon somethin with like 220rwkw would still keep up pretty well with like an SS?

some food for thought. A VE HSV Maloo R8 Ute (317kw) has around 220kw at the wheels and weighs 1700kg..

but once they start purchasing twin turbo kits, we're all in trouble :P

http://ls1turbo.com.au/au/ve_genttbb.html

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...