Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

why would you ask that? do you think its tune related?

yeah...initial tune on a new engine is critical...if too rich the excessively fueled mixture will not allow the rings to bed. It seems to me the engine has seen too much fuel for an extended period...contaminated an already below par oiling system...and failed.

Id be having a chat with the builder of the engine and who did the initial tune Joe.

Edited by DiRTgarage
  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

why would you ask that? do you think its tune related?

Doesnt overfuelling = extra rich tune?? But then you're wideband said 11.5 to 12 - so that doesnt add up.

Going back to your original post, you had lifter noise at 2500-3000 - was that straight after you got the motor, ie before the oil had a chance to become contaminated? If so, i guess that's a symptom of oil pressure issues.

Incomplete combustion = too rich (the black smoke is the incompletely burnt fuel, its coming out as carbon instead of co2), or missfire (say if you had a dodgy spark plug or coil, but you'd notice that).

Dirt - is 11.5 too rich for a new motor?

Incomplete combustion = too rich (the black smoke is the incompletely burnt fuel, its coming out as carbon instead of co2), or missfire (say if you had a dodgy spark plug or coil, but you'd notice that).

Dirt - is 11.5 too rich for a new motor?

no my latest race engine was run-in at 11.5's

well the report certainly seems to pinpoint the cause so i would say you got your moneys worth there. the engineer seems to know what he was talking about and checked everything properly. hopefully it tells you what you wanted to know about how and why it died. :devil:

well the report certainly seems to pinpoint the cause so i would say you got your moneys worth there. the engineer seems to know what he was talking about and checked everything properly. hopefully it tells you what you wanted to know about how and why it died. :cheers:

yeah thats all i really wanted. he did a great job for a good price.

i also want to point out - if i didnt have the overfueling problem would the motor still have starved of oil if i hit a track day seeing as though there was a blockage of the oil pick-up? i never really noticed it as i didnt hit the higher revs very often. only time i heard anything was at WSID after a run, i heard what i now realise was lifter noise - i never really got to inspect it as by the time i got back to the pits the noise was gone.

Edited by SECURITY
So you know there was an oil control issue but do you know what caused it? Shouldn't the builder have been checking such things as he went along?

it just didnt occure to me that it was an oil problem, i even swung past the engine builder's workshop while i was in the area teling him that i was really happy with the motor etc etc - i figured that all rb's had noisy lifters and thats what it was, just the lifters playing up. but as you go along you start to piece things together, unfortunately for me it happened a bit too late.

sounds like you've also got a dented sump, and is messin up your oil pickup. That aint good. Bottom the sump out on something?

You make sure to not let the car idle too much too? idling often causes fuel wash, is shit for run ins.

Sorry to hear. bloody expensive.

sounds like you've also got a dented sump, and is messin up your oil pickup. That aint good. Bottom the sump out on something?

You make sure to not let the car idle too much too? idling often causes fuel wash, is shit for run ins.

Sorry to hear. bloody expensive.

nah no dent in the sump mate.

This is kind of my point also, though I didn't have the technical understanding, as I was pointing out that oil-control had been listed as an issue and that comes down to the builder.

I still think he's at fault here.

It may have been overfueling and ultimatly not run in correctly but doesnt that report also states that the incorrect or not suitable enough O ring was installed on the oil pick up??

I have seen many which dont have flat flanges but if you use a suitable sized O ring they seal perfectly fine.

Alot of pickups have slightly curved flanges so when the bolts are tightened down it puts tension on the O ring.

Whilst it may have not been run in properly it surely would have failed on the track at high rpm due to the oil pick up sucking air through a less than adequate O ring seal.....

That comes back to whoever assembled it not using the correct O ring in the correct position. From the way I read the report even if the tune was spot on for running in an engine in the the long run the faulty O ring would have caused the engines demise further down the track anyways, the contaminated oil mearly enhanced the problem???

It may have been overfueling and ultimatly not run in correctly but doesnt that report also states that the incorrect or not suitable enough O ring was installed on the oil pick up??

I have seen many which dont have flat flanges but if you use a suitable sized O ring they seal perfectly fine.

Alot of pickups have slightly curved flanges so when the bolts are tightened down it puts tension on the O ring.

Whilst it may have not been run in properly it surely would have failed on the track at high rpm due to the oil pick up sucking air through a less than adequate O ring seal.....

That comes back to whoever assembled it not using the correct O ring in the correct position. From the way I read the report even if the tune was spot on for running in an engine in the the long run the faulty O ring would have caused the engines demise further down the track anyways, the contaminated oil mearly enhanced the problem???

spot on...post of the thread

i just thought i'd add that when the car initially left the tuners, he even said himself that it was running a bit LEAN. on my way home i did some touch ups which saw the car on ~14.7 on idle (factory ecu settings as i run an emanage ultimate), and around 11.7-12.1 on low boost levels and around 14.5-14.7 (std ecu settings) on cruise. it wasnt the best tune but i wasnt taking it over 4000rpm anyway.

later on after the run-in period i got into trialing software which cleaned up my afr's more - which i have data logs of. my AFR's were never dangerously rich or lean at any point other than the drive home from the tuners. and if it was lean after turning some boost up, it was for 1 power run to input into the software then afr's were sweet again.

not his fault that the o-ring on the pick-up wasnt assembled properly?

i'll guess i'll just want till he opens up for the new year and see how we go. he seems like a reasonable guy, the engineer reports states a critical fault that would have come up in the build stage so we'll just have to talk it out and see where it takes us.

Edited by SECURITY

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...