Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi admins

I had an idea a little while ago about a forum for workshop feedback (see this thread: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Go...html&st=20)

Anyway my idea is that there would be a forum, perhaps split into state sections, where people could post feedback on workshops without any form of endorsement from SAU itself. Each workshop would be entitled to a single thread and there would be no stickies / preference given to any particular workshop, allowing honest feedback and discussion.

There would be rules to cover slanderous comments and people would have to stick to the facts strictly as well. That's not to say that workshops couldn't get a negative rap, but it would have to be a factious negative rap without slander and sticking to what actually happened etc.

Regards

Ian

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/248912-workshop-feedback-forum/
Share on other sites

Hi admins

I had an idea a little while ago about a forum for workshop feedback (see this thread: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Go...html&st=20)

Anyway my idea is that there would be a forum, perhaps split into state sections, where people could post feedback on workshops without any form of endorsement from SAU itself. Each workshop would be entitled to a single thread and there would be no stickies / preference given to any particular workshop, allowing honest feedback and discussion.

There would be rules to cover slanderous comments and people would have to stick to the facts strictly as well. That's not to say that workshops couldn't get a negative rap, but it would have to be a factious negative rap without slander and sticking to what actually happened etc.

Regards

Ian

I think thats a great idea

Sorry - there is no negative or otherwise allowed on SAU

This is so that SAU exists, and continues to exist for many years without issue.

We've had a number of legal challenges over the years and really dont need a single one of them.

There is always two sides to every story, and sadly, you'll never know the truth, there is no way to prove events and so on.

If people have such an issue with a workshop, take them to court and then post up the details once a court decides you are right.

Sorry - there is no negative or otherwise allowed on SAU

This is so that SAU exists, and continues to exist for many years without issue.

We've had a number of legal challenges over the years and really dont need a single one of them.

There is always two sides to every story, and sadly, you'll never know the truth, there is no way to prove events and so on.

If people have such an issue with a workshop, take them to court and then post up the details once a court decides you are right.

This seems grossly unfair on the consumers, who are the vast majority of the population of this forum. As it currently stands, workshops are getting away with daylight robbery and dodgy work every day and they are not being held to account because everyone's too scared.

Lawsuits are expensive, drawn out things which often drag peoples names, including the workshops, through the mud and few every make it to trial, most being settled out of court. I doubt that most workshops, which run on a pretty tight budget, would be able to marshal sufficient resources to make a proper attack on a public forum, and even then, if in the course of the trial it comes out that the original complaint was correct, as it most likely will, then it will be thrown from court.

It would be far more affordable for a workshop to simply fix their fu**ups as they should have done anyway.

However I respect your decision, as gutless as it is.

This seems grossly unfair on the consumers, who are the vast majority of the population of this forum. As it currently stands, workshops are getting away with daylight robbery and dodgy work every day and they are not being held to account because everyone's too scared.

Lawsuits are expensive, drawn out things which often drag peoples names, including the workshops, through the mud and few every make it to trial, most being settled out of court. I doubt that most workshops, which run on a pretty tight budget, would be able to marshal sufficient resources to make a proper attack on a public forum, and even then, if in the course of the trial it comes out that the original complaint was correct, as it most likely will, then it will be thrown from court.

It would be far more affordable for a workshop to simply fix their fu**ups as they should have done anyway.

However I respect your decision, as gutless as it is.

Feel free to create your own forum and implement the aforementioned section.

+1

couldn't have said it better.

You probably could have if you tried.

This seems grossly unfair on the consumers, who are the vast majority of the population of this forum. As it currently stands, workshops are getting away with daylight robbery and dodgy work every day and they are not being held to account because everyone's too scared.

Lawsuits are expensive, drawn out things which often drag peoples names, including the workshops, through the mud and few every make it to trial, most being settled out of court. I doubt that most workshops, which run on a pretty tight budget, would be able to marshal sufficient resources to make a proper attack on a public forum, and even then, if in the course of the trial it comes out that the original complaint was correct, as it most likely will, then it will be thrown from court.

It would be far more affordable for a workshop to simply fix their fu**ups as they should have done anyway.

However I respect your decision, as gutless as it is.

Gutless? Oh please.

This forum exists, and continues to exist due to smart and careful administration.

Do you want to pay our legal fees for any legal challenges that come up? (as they have in the past, and I'm not joking)

I'll take the liberty to answer it for you - Your going to say - No.

So until such a time as you are willing, and its in writing, such a section will not exist.

I also know a few other Forum Owners of various sites, and this is a reasonable issue. One decent court case will spell the end of a forum, simple as that.

To call it a gutless decision to keep the forums here, for everyone, is stupid and ignorant.

Feel free to go and start your own forum, pay for the server, software and everything else. Then you might understand a thing or two about where we come from

Feel free to go and start your own forum, pay for the server, software and everything else. Then you might understand a thing or two about where we come from

well, okay, I've been thinking about creating a website for workshop reviews for a while now anyway. Believe it or not, but I already understand a thing or two about web hosting etc, im in my final year at QUT doing a Bachelor of IT.

Dont take this the wrong way, I don't wish to start a pissing contest with you, you have your policy of protecting workshops from negative feedback and thats fine, I believe I can create a system which should work without risk. I can understand your position, as much as I don't agree with it, and im happy to host the website myself and meet the costs of hosting etc.

Ill have a URL for you within a week. :(

Regards

Ian

I do understand mate. I just think that your maybe being a bit over-protective.

A few interesting reads for you:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=4320011

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=4319931

Anyway I dont want to get into an argument, your an admin on this forum and its not exactly a fair playing field. I have stated my case, you told me no, make your own forum and I will.

Regards

Ian

I do understand mate. I just think that your maybe being a bit over-protective.

A few interesting reads for you:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=4320011

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=4319931

Anyway I dont want to get into an argument, your an admin on this forum and its not exactly a fair playing field. I have stated my case, you told me no, make your own forum and I will.

Regards

Ian

That is fantastic to hear about your IT degree :nyaanyaa: Well done.

All the best with your forums mate :rofl:

Cheers

I have registered the domain and setup a basic forum, waiting for the DNS to propagate and have had some help writing up a disclaimer etc, also need to do some other small things then it should be underway.

I haven't laid out a huge outlay for hosting etc yet, we will see if the idea takes off before I invest more money into it.

Cheers

I have registered the domain and setup a basic forum, waiting for the DNS to propagate and have had some help writing up a disclaimer etc, also need to do some other small things then it should be underway.

I haven't laid out a huge outlay for hosting etc yet, we will see if the idea takes off before I invest more money into it.

Sounds good man. How much did you pay for the disclaimer?

  • 2 months later...
we will see if the idea takes off before I invest more money into it.

I'm guessing it didn't take off?

For the record, I don't protect businesses, on the contrary, I love seeing businesses get whats coming to them when they deserve it, but a lot of the time a disgruntled customer can cause a lot of damage to a businesses reputation when, as Ash said, there is always two sides to the story. I had a lengthy phone call with a QLD importer just yesterday about comments made on the forums that were unjust, he explained the situation and I removed the thread. It was only fair as I was able to see the argument from both sides.

On a side note, if we can get workshops / businesses to sign a disclaimer freeing SAU from any legal responsibility regardless of what is posted, then yeah, I'm more than happy to have the feedback for that business posted, but how many businesses / workshops do you think will be willing to sign something like that?

Ian, I like your passion man, seriously. I think you underestimate how much time we put into making this place run the way it does. No decisions are made without lots of thought and sometimes legal advice (such as in this case).

C

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • LOL.... a good amount of people (not all) on that continent seem to know everything and like to measure things in bananas, football fields, statue of liberties instead of the metric system lol.
    • I assume the modules are similar enough, so if you've had no issues I don't see why I would. I have tried to find a wiring diagram for the FPCM / fuel pump circuit, but I can't find it anywhere. Otherwise, I would just do some wire cutting and joining at the FPCM and give the 12 V supplied to the FPCM directly to the pump instead. If you know anyone that could help with wiring diagrams, I'd be very happy  
    • If it dies, then bypass. The task isn't difficult. I have one running on a standard R32 FPCM. That's after nearly 20 years of it running an 040, which pull substantially more current than the Walbro. They're not the same module, but I'd hope it indicates that the R33 one should be man enough for the job. I think people kill them when putting proper sized pumps on them, not these little toy pumps we're talking about here.
    • Silicone spray won't hurt anything. And if it does, that's an opportunity to put some solid steel spherical bushings in, so you can really learn what suspension noise sounds like, If you're going to try it, just spray one bush at a time, so you can work out which one is actually noisy. My best guess is that if the noise started only since putting the coilovers in, then it is just noise being transmitted up through the top mounts of the struts, and not necessarily "new" noise from bushes. But it's almost impossible to know.
    • Are you saying the 34 is SUV height, and not that we're talking about an SUV here? (because if we're talking about an SUV, you don't fix them. You just replace them when something breaks. Not worth establishing sufficient emotional connection with an SUV to warrant doing any work on one). I wouldn't jack my car up on a short little loop of 10mm steel rod poking out through a hole in the bumper bar, front or rear end. I realise that we're probably not talking about that type of loop at the front, being the one under/behind the bar on a Skyline.... but even for that one, trying to jack up on what amounts to a thin piece of steel, designed purely for withstanding a horizontal tension force, not a vertical compressive force (and so would be prone to buckling/crushing) and, my most particular bitch about it - located RIGHT AT THE EXTREME FRONT OF THE CAR, applying a load up through the radiator support panel, etc, with almost the entire mass of the car cantilevered between there and the rear wheels? Nope. Not doing that. Not on the regular. That structure out there in front of the front crossmember is not designed to carry load in the vertical direction. Not really designed to carry any load at all, really. The chassis rail that the tow point is connected to would be fine loaded in tension, as per towing. Not intended to carry the mass of the whole car, especially loaded all on one rail, with twisting and all sorts of shitty load distribution going on. No, I will happily drive up on some pieces of wood, thanks. That can only happen on driven wheels, and they are at the other end of the car, and this problem does not exist at that end of the car. And even then, I have been known to drive up on at least 1x piece of 2x8 each side at the rear, simply to reduce the amount of jack pumping necessary to get the car up high enough for the jack stands. What really really shits me about Skylines is the lack of decent places for chassis stands at either end of the car. You'd think they'd be designed into the crossmembers.
×
×
  • Create New...