Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys

the car is a r33 gtst

with a rb30/25 combo

engine was built buy hills motorsport

has

no vct solid cam

tomei pro cams 270duration 10.2 lift for inlet and exhaust

findaza adjustable cam gears

side entry plenum

mahl pistons

argo rods

acl race series bearings

n1 oil pump

standard harmonic balancer

rpm single plate ceramic clutch

3inch exhaust

tial wastgate

gt3540/ 82 r

power fc

740cc injectors

z32 airflow

eboost 2

car is getting tuned by 3 eleven motorsport tuner is shane brandon, currently worked for newcastle perfromance and unique auto sports

car will not make over 280kw no matter what boost pressure

1 problem,

thought to believe the car was polluting the charge? so after extensive hours and fiddling we put on adjustable camgears and found out that the timing was retarded.

fixed this issue dialed the cams in and still no significant power gains, then noticed problem 2

2.

boost pressure, turbo will create 20psi of boost but will not boost pressure. on the dyno graph. boost plot, the line drastically falls away at higher rpm, so we checked boost controller installation no problems

so then we disconected the conroller and ran it just with the wastgate, to find out it has a 7 psi spring,

so obivusly a stronger spring is needed?

problem number 3?

with the cams being 270 duration and 10.2 lift shouldnt it have a distintive idle? the car sounds like a boat, no crisp lumpy idle?

but on the short fall we cannot seem to get the figures you guys are creating.

an rb30/25 combo should be pushing around 320 350 kw at 25 psi?

any feed back would be great as my patience has worn particullary thin

Edited by stocko
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249720-rb3025-struggling-to-create-power/
Share on other sites

1. Look at the exhaust being overly restrictive (mufflers, cat)

2. Same for inlet/filter

3. Check to see your unions at all points between compressor and throttle are perfect. Where is the boost gauge feed being taken from? From the manifold, closest to the inlet valves is best because that accounts for losses through the entire inlet tract.

The unknown factor of compression ratio is a bit problematic because that will have significant bearing on what boost ceiling you should set.

The cam and turbo spec suggest you'd be chasing 500rwhp out of an engine that can hold power to 7500rpm, but no sign of porting, quality exhaust manifold (6boost style), crank balancing, or a quality harmonic balancer to deal with those revs and mass-flow throughputs. All components have to work together.

From the first post though, you should find 400rwhp an easy target to hit, so check the three suggestions.

Good luck and keep us informed.

1. Look at the exhaust being overly restrictive (mufflers, cat)

2. Same for inlet/filter

3. Check to see your unions at all points between compressor and throttle are perfect. Where is the boost gauge feed being taken from? From the manifold, closest to the inlet valves is best because that accounts for losses through the entire inlet tract.

The unknown factor of compression ratio is a bit problematic because that will have significant bearing on what boost ceiling you should set.

The cam and turbo spec suggest you'd be chasing 500rwhp out of an engine that can hold power to 7500rpm, but no sign of porting, quality exhaust manifold (6boost style), crank balancing, or a quality harmonic balancer to deal with those revs and mass-flow throughputs. All components have to work together.

From the first post though, you should find 400rwhp an easy target to hit, so check the three suggestions.

Good luck and keep us informed.

cheers well muffler is not restricted cat is missing the internals as was clogged, new item is waiting fittment

inlet/ filter is fine

boost guage is off the manifold 4 nipples for vacume lines

Boost falling away at the top end is normally a sign of rising backpressure, which is why I'd suggested the exhaust system as first area to check.

Is the muffler/s a proven thing? Easy to confirm your belief about them by dropping the system from just before the cat, and run on the dyno like that. If it makes the power then that would be where you spend money to fix it, otherwise it's cost you bugger all and given ideas where else to look.

Something that I've seen overlooked is whether people port match the T3 housing flange to the divided T3 stock manifold. Trying to force great quantity of air into the turbine past that 5-6mm lip is going to cause a lot of problems with efficiency.

If your tuner has the experience he would surely be looking at these obvious things anyway? What plan has he got to find the problem?

A couple of pics of your engine setup and current dyno sheets would be good..

Edited by Dale FZ1
Boost falling away at the top end is normally a sign of rising backpressure, which is why I'd suggested the exhaust system as first area to check.

Is the muffler/s a proven thing? Easy to confirm your belief about them by dropping the system from just before the cat, and run on the dyno like that. If it makes the power then that would be where you spend money to fix it, otherwise it's cost you bugger all and given ideas where else to look.

Something that I've seen overlooked is whether people port match the T3 housing flange to the divided T3 stock manifold. Trying to force great quantity of air into the turbine past that 5-6mm lip is going to cause a lot of problems with efficiency.

If your tuner has the experience he would surely be looking at these obvious things anyway? What plan has he got to find the problem?

A couple of pics of your engine setup and current dyno sheets would be good..

the exhuast has made 270kw with the rb and gtrs turbo

hes plan is to upgrade the wastegate spring, and that should settle the boost down,

but for the non lumpy idle i have no idea

i dont know any or the specs,

bad bad experiances with engine build

I think this is one of the biggest hurdles. You need to know what the parts are, and that they are spec'd to work together.

Then the actual assembly of things has to be first rate. Things like matching the turbine to manifold are important and can't be overlooked if you want an engine to have a realistic chance of making the power its parts are spec'd to support.

the exhuast has made 270kw with the rb and gtrs turbo

hes plan is to upgrade the wastegate spring, and that should settle the boost down,

but for the non lumpy idle i have no idea

Big difference in flow requirements for 370 and 480rwhp if that's what you want to target. Can only suggest dropping the system to double check, especially if you potentially have a back pressure problem to chase.

If you want 20psi boost, then install a spring spec'd to 20psi. Make life simple, and use your controller to stop creep and bring the boost rise on sharper.

Are the comments about lumpy idle disappointment about the sound, or nagging concern that maybe the cams installed aren't what you believe them to be? That's a lot of lift to be having in a 25 head - was it machined to accept the cams?

um find a new tuner!

Maybe the tuner is producing the best results with the machinery presented?

Dale has hit on a lot of good points, take note and complete the simple tests. Don't shoot down suggestions without trying them first, as you are the only one that will lose/gain from the results.

270kw from an rb25 is very different to 270kw on an rb30. With that turbo you should be making at least 330rwkw, so drop that exhaust and do another run on the dyno. You will also need to fit at least a 1bar spring in the waste gate, as a 7psi spring is way too soft and will allow the gases to escape prematurely.

Assuming you have reasonable compression it 'should' be making around 400rwkw at 25psi...

I would be looking at base timing, a leak down test to check the valves are seating properly and a compression test will let you know if the comp ratio is in the ballpark. A low cr wont do you any favours.

Letting it breathe is the key as dalefz1 has said, imo these are a few things you should consider: a 3.5" exh making sure non of the mufflers step down (magnaflow race series etc), keeping the inlet pipe 4" without stepping down for an 80mm afm, and perhaps most importantly a quality merge collector type manifold.

my stock internal 8.5.1 compression .82 rb30 44tial (r32 25 head) made 310kws on a run in tune at 18psi.

your cams dont seem to be installed at all correctly? are you having spark issues also? whats happening with the afm voltage also?

got a graph? what valve springs are you using? any chance of float?

drop the exuahst off first coz its easiet, lose as much of it as you can.

you say power wont go up even if you crank the boost up, what happens to the A:F ratio when you wind it up?

comp+leak down tests

Make sure the bolts on your cam gears are tight.

There was another thread like this before, after weeks of trial and error they found that those bolts came loose and timing was waaaay out.

And yes find another tuner.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

what is your boost controller. if it cant make it make boost then id say youve reached the limmit for the turbine side of your turbo..

ps.. how did you get 270,10.25 cams in a rb25 head? i take it has some sort of solid lifter conversion? from the sounds of it the cam timing may be out.. but not 100kw out.

post up a graph.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...