Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys i just got home friday night from O.s in Japan, the Next day i was moving into my new house, i was driving along stud road with my g.f following behing in her car and suddenly a black SS cut her off to get behing me and a second later the red and blue flashing lights came on, i was strait away told to lift the hood( no breath test nothing) The police (Pettet of Knox station) told me i couldnt have my intercooler bleed valve pod etc etc. He gave me a minor defect and told me i have to get a enginearing certificate to certify the hole that the intercooler piping goes through and gave me 8 days to fix it (merry christmas)

can someone please explain what i have to get done to certify this.

I am hoping i dont need to put the stock cooler on and plug up the hole?

Has this happned to anyone else and what did you have to do to fix it?

thanks Ben

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249946-defected-on-stud-road/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Pettet knows his stuff and has a reputation for targetting imports.

You are not able to make holes in the body of the car for piping. They will need to be repaired (covered/filled) for it to be satisfactory to the best of my knowledge. I suggest reading through the EPA thread as i'm sure this must have been covered before. My recommendation would be to get it to an engineer quick. You'll most likely have to remove the intercooler you are using unless you can get some custom piping to connect it another way.

As far as I was aware you can make holes so long as they are not structurally damaging hence the need for the Engineers cert. probably cost you a hundred bucks or there abouts to get it checked but good luck finding an auto engineer that is still open for business now. BUMMER!!

They only bring him out for special occasions.

Holes shouldn't have to be covered up, if it is decreasing the structural integrity you need someone to secure a steel plate around the hole to return it to how it was.

As for the other stuff your state differs to mine.

How nice of him to do this before Chrissy! Hopefully an engineer is working through it

Its going to be a pain. When my last car got defected, including the fine for illegal mods and the engineers certificate it cost just over $700. Back then (2004/5) the hole was ok and the engineer had no problems giving it the thumbs up. But now i hear you actually have to cover it up

i got done by that ass face too

i have to get a vass certificate, go for an epa test, not just the exhaust test (my exhaust is stock) get a rwc and also pay the fines

i dun mind paying its just time consuming

pettet ur really earning your 20k a year arnt you

LMAO

I was under the belief that in the series two r33 having the whole cut (if it is where I presume it is) was illegal because it effected the air bag sensor or something along those lines however it wasnt a problem if it was a series 1?? anyone care to expand on that probable useless information that I have...eventhough its probably too late for me now since I've cut the hole already.

Sounds right Zorb, remember hearing that too.

I think I must have been the only person Peteet didnt nail too bad. I only copped an EPA from him. However it was supposed to be a full test but he only submitted the option for exhaust noise.

There is a thread on the hole cutting. Do a search mate, its in this section and has all the info you need

Basically...

If your car came FACTORY with an airbag - he is right.

If your car came FACTORY without an airbag - he is wrong, so take him to court. I would and you'll win.

But find the thread and read it, if you cant PM me and ill have a go at it over the next couple of days

If the pic in your avatar is your car then the cooler hole should be fine since yours is a series 1, as for the bleed valve, im assuming that is a boost controller, very easy to remove for an rwc, the front mount plus pod is something everyone either knows about or should know about, only 1 inlet mod allowed in vic, so either you have to put the standard intercooler back on and keep your pod or put a factory airbox in and keep your front mount, and unless you making good power or want the wank factor of the induction noise an airbox with a good panel filter does the same as a pod any way.

Edited by W0rp3D

he's just doing his job.

i got sent to the EPA ONE DAY after picking up the car from a respray, new turbos, tune etc etc... he wasn't an arsehole, nor was I, but legally, he was right - i went to the EPA and sorted it.

yes, he does a lot of skylines, but he also does a LOT of shitboxes too - I was having a chat with him. There is no "shitboxesaustralia" so you don't hear about him getting these wheezers off the road!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...