Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Interestingly (or not) the motor the Leyton House team went on to use was an Ilmor V10. Which morphed into a Mercedes Benz badged unit. Which went into the back of the Sauber. Well before Sauber was taken over by BMW. See how incestuous F1 is?

and arguably the worlds greatest ever N/A supercar, the McLaren F1, is powered by a bespoke BMW Motorsport designed V12. of course that arrangement predates the McLaren/Mercedes affiliation, but i'm sure it grates on the M-B top brass anyway...

not to mention the fact the era when McLaren (and Williams) used to trample all over Ferrari (mid 80's to 90's), the cars sported Honda power. Honda should have just stuck with what they did best.

Is it possible i am starting to feel a little sympathy for old Lewis? He makes life so difficult for himself. Somebody on thsi forum said last year he needs to sack his Carrera GT crashing Dad as manager and get some professional management. I think there may have been a bit of logic to that thinking

On the flip side is Vettel, even younger yet comes clean and apologises to Webber straight after the race at Fuji. Apologises to Kubz straight after the race when most think it was jsut hard racing. Then interviews jokes about how hot Malaysia is and needign dry ice on his balls when driving.

The guy is at the complete opposite end of the spectrum then Lewis, and can steer. I was talking to a BMW mechanic at a dodgy Malaysian bar last week, (i luv Malaysian beer fluffers :D ) and was asking did Vettel show such promise when he was driving for them? If so wy did they dump him. He smiled and said BMW management are not stupid and there are clauses in said contract :P So suggested much with Button and Williams and their loan to BAR etc etc

Yeh i think they shouls stay. Season is variable enough at present. Though since nothing will get done the Brawn cars are going to run away with the season. They are toying with the other teams by only going as fast as they need to. Until this diffuser thing is resolved i think only then will we get to see how quick the Brawn cars are

If they stay, fine; on the proviso that all the teams who don't currently have 'em are allowed to develop and test their own for this years cars. It's only fair. Otherwise it's an obvious competitive advantage to the others.

If they stay, fine; on the proviso that all the teams who don't currently have 'em are allowed to develop and test their own for this years cars. It's only fair. Otherwise it's an obvious competitive advantage to the others.

lol

racing isn't fair the best team wins. why should the teams that made the choice to design their diffusers differently to given a helping hand by the FIA?

I think it will be much better to watch a team trying to test out their new diffusers in race practices, then go back on the in season testing rule.

I'm going to be surprised too if they don't get banned. Having said that though if they're not banned (and it looks as though Ferrari might be thinking it won't) I can't see it taking a full season for outfits like Ferrari/McLaren/BMW and RBR to catch up at least in the diffuser department.

I'm going to be surprised too if they don't get banned. Having said that though if they're not banned (and it looks as though Ferrari might be thinking it won't) I can't see it taking a full season for outfits like Ferrari/McLaren/BMW and RBR to catch up at least in the diffuser department.

I will be gobsmacked if they get banned.

It won't take any of the major teams very long to get the new arrangement implemented. The lack of testing will not hurt them as everything will be sorted using their wind tunnels, cfd systems & shaker rigs.

I cant see it being easy for any team to catch up. Especially RBR whose rear suspension will make it difficult to package. Also the diffuser is part of the tub up near the driver, wasnt that the loop hole in the rules (Loosely?)

So to incorporate the change it means changing about the biggest thing on the car and that is underbody airflow. I cant see it being an easy thing to test without lots of track kms...BUT, then again Brawn did the whole exercise on the drawing board and got it right, but they had all of last year to pen it

I cant see it being easy for any team to catch up. Especially RBR whose rear suspension will make it difficult to package. Also the diffuser is part of the tub up near the driver, wasnt that the loop hole in the rules (Loosely?)

So to incorporate the change it means changing about the biggest thing on the car and that is underbody airflow. I cant see it being an easy thing to test without lots of track kms...BUT, then again Brawn did the whole exercise on the drawing board and got it right, but they had all of last year to pen it

Yeah the Brawn thing was sort of my point. It was good out of the box. Compared to the McLaren which is a dog which no amount of testing will fix. RBR are the odd one out as they are the only team running a pullrod rear.

I would have thought that most of the big tems would have been working on the revised diffuser since before Melbourne.

I would have thought that most of the big tems would have been working on the revised diffuser since before Melbourne.

I agree. I think even for RBR with the expertise of Adrian Newey and the wealth of knowledge acquired from F1 in the past it shouldn't be too hard. Same for Ferrari/McLaren they'll have data from the past as well as wind tunnel data that'll speed this process up. Ground Effects, if this is want you want to call isn't something new.....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
    • Yep, totally get that. However hooking in for Generator back up is only a few hundred bucks for the wiring. You could put a couple of those in (for different circuits explicitly) and run a couple of baby generators. Bonus, you can balance them across different circuits, and now have backups in your backup. I'm looking at buying places that won't even have water etc, and I don't mind the idea of getting off the electric grid either, even with everything you've said. This country already has enough power outages that even the mains grid isn't that reliable anymore. I do agree though on spending a bit more to get better gear, and to add some extra redundancy in to the system too.
×
×
  • Create New...