Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'll print off a overlay of a GT3076R vs Kando T67 with very similar mods and on the same dyno... You will be very surprised how similar they are :)

If I wanted to I can do a 13-15sec ramped run and make my graph come on that early like "wasnt me" run.

I'm not revving it to 8000rpm for a number, it's going to be like that all the time... If I wanted a number it would be going to 9000rpm

Not really crazy, most the drift guys over here run 8500rpm and sit on limiter all day without too many issues

Maybe thats why some motors last and some don't. I personally dont rev mine past 7100.

Maybe thats why some motors last and some don't. I personally dont rev mine past 7100.

Still making 405kw at 7100 :)

Remember also that mine is still a happy at 8000rpm and power is still rising, where as GT30 turbine Garretts have turned over well before then and the motor is just getting stressed.

I guess only time will tell how long it lasts...

Still making 405kw at 7100 :)

Remember also that mine is still a happy at 8000rpm and power is still rising, where as GT30 turbine Garretts have turned over well before then and the motor is just getting stressed.

I guess only time will tell how long it lasts...

Your missing the point...Why rev your engine to 8000rpm when you could make the same power at 6000rpm....The most my car has made is 356rwkw (Mainline Dyno from memory) and it sees that at a bit over 6000rpm. My car has been on E85 for 2+ years now and i havnt looked back. Response and power cant beat it...If you are ever in SA i will be more than happy to take you for a spin.

Whats a good close GTR estimate of 400rwkw in awkw? Anyone got the AWD drivelines power loss figures from one of them sweet dynos?

I ask cause I'm running 301awkw now, I'd assume that's up near 345-350rwkw? -5's, stock engine, 18psi.

Cause if that's the case, and I work the engine to handle 22+psi, throw in some cams, and minor port work, I figured 400rwkw is easily obtainable? Car already has all the other supporting mods, big cooler, big exhaust, afms, jectors, so on..

Really? I thought there was about a 10-15% difference in power output between the 2 drive types.

Edit: Heh, I've searched for this before, and I'm looking again, and it's tough to find an definitive answer through all the total nonsense answers.

Edited by GTRPowa

Further reading on trash forums, I found a bright spark with a convincing way of saying the drive train losses are fixed, what with all the articles/forum threads around talking about percentage losses.

Eg: You might make 200kw at the engine, and 140kw at the wheels. Then if you make 400kw at the engine, you'll make around 340kw at the wheels. Excuse the fact some of you probably know this, but I'd assume lots of people (myself included) think about fixed percentages.

And if that's the case, then the AWD mode on GTR's would used a fixed amount, instead of a percentage too. The pieces come together! :D

Edit: Excuse the fact if it's posted somewhere here, but I haven't seen it, and in fact, I've never read it this way until today... And I read forums a bit too..

Edited by GTRPowa

Huh? through a transfer case, diff, axles and hubs you gotta see at least a 20kw drop.

Has anyone done the back to back runs to check it out?

Power isn't always running through the transfer case...

Back to back runs always confirm they are so close there is nothing in it!

Further reading on trash forums, I found a bright spark with a convincing way of saying the drive train losses are fixed, what with all the articles/forum threads around talking about percentage losses.

Eg: You might make 200kw at the engine, and 140kw at the wheels. Then if you make 400kw at the engine, you'll make around 340kw at the wheels. Excuse the fact some of you probably know this, but I'd assume lots of people (myself included) think about fixed percentages.

And if that's the case, then the AWD mode on GTR's would used a fixed amount, instead of a percentage too. The pieces come together! :D

Edit: Excuse the fact if it's posted somewhere here, but I haven't seen it, and in fact, I've never read it this way until today... And I read forums a bit too..

Bloody hell don't start the fixed vs percentage debate again. There like a 10 page thread on it.

Percentage loss is a good way to work out factory approximate drivetrain losses. When you start making 3, 4 or even 5 times the factory power levels, those percentages are not logical any more. There was a big thing on it here, once again, a lot of people agreeing to disagree.

My arguement is you can't say that a drag car making 3000hp at the wheels is still going to have a 20% drivetrain loss coz that's BS

Power isn't always running through the transfer case...

Back to back runs always confirm they are so close there is nothing in it!

Power runs through the transfer while it's on the dyno though doesn't it?

The rear wheels are always in a slip event so the fronts should always be having 'some' torque applied to them. That torque has to come from somewhere

nah it's no where near that much. 400rwkw is about 375-380awkw or so. if you've got 301awkw you would be about 320-325rwkw on most dynos. there is not much difference between AWKW and RWKW on dyno dynamics dynos. certainly not 15%. and it's not a fixxed percentage anywway. the gap does widen a little bit the higher the power level but it's not linear. like it might be 20kw difference at 200kw and only 25kw at 400kw. there is no fixed answer. regardless of that even just different dynos vary a bit even when all reading RWKW or AWKW.

Power runs through the transfer while it's on the dyno though doesn't it?

The rear wheels are always in a slip event so the fronts should always be having 'some' torque applied to them. That torque has to come from somewhere

The rear wheels are not in a slip event if the dyno allows the front wheels to match speed... Even for a split second :)

if it will really help people sleep at night if I have time this weekend i'll put one of my GTRs on the dyno. run it in AWD, then run it in RWD and see what it gets.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • After using a protractor for an actually accurate assessment of what is required,  and by NOT using my uncalibrated eyeball I worked out I need a 25° silicone bend from the TB ro the MAF, but, my choice was either a 30° or a 23° (23° is a weird spec), so I grabbed the 23° one from Raceworks I also grabbed 1mtr of 3" straight from Just Jap, I needed 350mm, but they only had 300mm, or 1mtr lengths....meh Also ordered a 1/2" hose bulkhead fitting from fleabay, this has a smoothish mushroom looking head (they are designed for below the water line of boats) that will fit inside the bend, the hose bit and threaded bit looks to long, but nothing that a hacksaw cannot fix if required, the hose will then just get jamed on the threaded bit up to the retaining nut Fingers crossed and the unsightly amount of hose clamps will be reduced down to 4 once all the parts arrive 
    • Oil change does not trigger code 21. Code 21 is for coilpacks primary side connection. You can try to clear the code with a battery disconnect, hold down the brake pedal to drain capacitors through the brake lights with the ignition on for 10-15 seconds before you reconnect the battery. I have seen R35 coil conversion permanently cause this code with no ill effects so it might be the resistance it wants to see isn't quite right on one or more coilpacks. Could be inside the ECU, could be the harness, could be a coil. You can test it all if you want or just ignore until the car actually starts misfiring.
    • I forgot you have a Nistune ECU. Use Nistune to do all the tests I mentioned instead of faffing with 30+ year old electrical connectors. You can read MAF volts off that too, there are reference values in the service manual to tell you roughly what it should be in different conditions.
    • No. I think it might be the AFM. Hence the use of the terms "swaptronics", which implies the use of swapping out electronics for the purpose of diagnosis. It's about the only way to prove that a small/niggling/whatever problem with an AFM or a CAS or similar is actually caused by that AFM/CAS/whatever. A known good item swapped in that still gives the same problem is likely to be caused somewhere else. They're all the same. Spraying AFMs with cleaner is an each way bet between cleaning it and f**king it.
    • Oh wow! This might actually work amazingly. Do you know the ratio of the diff? I was told the only thing you need to make sure of is if the front & rear diff ratios are the same. Ours is a 4.083 Thanks!
×
×
  • Create New...