Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Have there been many results with the gtx3076r around the place?

I dont think on here.. I know the supra forums have some results, and also the S2K guys have some results too. A search in google gave me a lot of BS, if i have time later when i get home i'll post the links.

Have them in favourites on the lap top :) on the phone atm, sorry mate!

Marko - thanks for the reply. I'll go through and have another read, i remember reading that they are stock items in AMG's, etc? The flow rate is awesome.. Price isnt too much of a drama, would rather hold out a bit longer to get good equipment.

Feel free to post up how you go fitting it :)

That GT3582R compressor map isn't right... see from Garrett:

Damn, I knew it was too good to be true. How can the maps be different? I got that one off the ATP US website.

It does say 68mm not 82mm like the one you posted too.

Dajae - I bought a pierburg but haven't fitted it yet...I created a thread on my findings and what I can tell you is that it flows more than the aeromotive stealth by a decent margin but I can't recall the figures exactly.

As a comparison, Bosch 044 flows 200ltrs/min @ 5bar whereas the pierburg flows 360ltrs/min @ 5bar.

They are not cheap so expect to pay about $450 with a filter.

You wont regret it. I am running 2 of the suckers and together they are quieter than one walbro or bosch.

You wont regret it. I am running 2 of the suckers and together they are quieter than one walbro or bosch.

Great stuff, do you have them intank or external? How did you go about fitting them, not really a drop in? I had a quick search, but only found discussions on the use of them, not so much the fitting etc. My walbro is fairly quiet (although I dont really have much to compare it to), so if its even quieter, fantastic!

Veyron.. 4 of these pumps all together isn't it?

Ok, so some results for the GTX3076R .. Turns out it probably can flow enough for ~400rwkw :) but with all things, we should take this on board with some speculation. I mean like seriously, a Focus with over 400fwkw... With an intercooler the size of a cereal box? C'mon... Lol. Ok, enough jibber-jabber, linky time!

http://www.nissansilvia.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=497486

^ Bit of a comparo with a GT3076R.

^ The focus with 600whp..

http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2110277

^ Fairly good write up on some of the GTX range. You can see here why I'm pretty confident of the GTX3076R hitting ~400rwkw.

^ And finally, an RB25 making 534whp. I know, its not *quite* 400rwkw, but farout it's close! Awesome stuff.

I'm drooling at the thought of getting one now.. :D

There is no way that 240SX belongs to that dyno graph. Have a look at the way it ramps up compared to the power line.

There is also a very very very slim chance you would ever get a real 530rwhp from a GTX3076 and not on 26PSI.

On 20PSI the GT3076R is lucky to crack 300RWKW. 6psi more and a 10% more efficient compressor does no equal 130hp at the wheels. I'm betting methanol or nitrous help if the figure is right

On E85 I can fully see them hitting 400kw, as I've already said. On pump gas, I'm pretty confident of it NOT happening. You don't need >60lb/min of flow to make that kind of power when using flash fuels though.

a lot of dynos in the UK (if thats where the focus one is from) give readings based on some crap math for "flywheel" hp

Definately have to take this results with some sceptism, but the potential is there.

Lith, agreed with e85 400wkw would be achievable. Hopefully when r33_racer (sorry i dont know your name, im quite a n00b to the skyline community) gets the gtx on the 3.4, will see some similar results. Anyway, enough of me hijacking the thread.

Thanks for the input guys :)

There is no way that 240SX belongs to that dyno graph. Have a look at the way it ramps up compared to the power line.

There is also a very very very slim chance you would ever get a real 530rwhp from a GTX3076 and not on 26PSI.

On 20PSI the GT3076R is lucky to crack 300RWKW. 6psi more and a 10% more efficient compressor does no equal 130hp at the wheels. I'm betting methanol or nitrous help if the figure is right

Agree on the 240sx. To look at the car on the dyno it's hardly straining the dyno. To make that sort of power with a 4th gear run your going to be making upward of 8000N of tractive effort. When you are making 8000N you can tell that the car is wanting to leave the dyno - that car is barely moving on the dyno.

I don't believe it will be impossible to make 400rwkw with a gtx3076r but you will need high octane fuel min 105ron. And your may need to increase the cr to help the bsfc.

Edited by rob82

What makes you think it might not?

They take alot of meat out of the block to fit the 3.4 stroker. Have heard of a few blocks not holding up for long.

Have u tested one before?

Only what i have been told never seen

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...