Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

577awKW

RB26 @ 2 BAR

GT4088R 1.06 ar Full-Race Twinscroll Mani

Kelford 280 cams Fully ported Head

Greddy intake plenum

Vipec ECU

ID1000 injectors 2 bosch 044 pumps

many more looking to upgade ignition so i can run more boost currently running superspark coils and they are not cutting it

ID1000's huh

What fuel?

It would need to be C16. He doesn't have enough injector size to make that HP on anything else

ID1000's huh

It would need to be C16. He doesn't have enough injector size to make that HP on anything else

Yeah that power on e85 with 1000cc inj on an rb26 sounds a little high plus that turbo is only rated to about 680hp worth of airflow too. Must have the world most efficient engine....

Edited by rob82

Or just running 70+psi fuel pressure...?

70psi only gets them up to about 1400cc. Still not high enough for 580kw I don't think. It may do, just skeptical. There's also the little issue of two Bosch 044 pumps flowing enough fuel for that HP. Two should only JUST do 500kw on E85.

If the guy could confirm what his highest injector ms is at peak power we will definitely know if that's legit or not

Dual 044's flow around 560l/hr at 14V.

So 9333cc/min or 1500cc/min per injector in a 6 cylinder, so the pumps in this case should outflow the injectors.

I'm not sure what pumps you have tested but none we have ever seen flow what you are saying in real world results.

Bosch rate their 044 pump at 200L/hr at 5bar. This was taken straight off the Bosch website in their pump technical data PDF.

That's 3.3L/min at 12V.

They also state that the test is performed using N-Heptane which has a different viscosity and density than petrol.

Let's give them the benefit of the doubt and say 4L/min @ 14V.

At 12cc/HP on E85 that's 666hp or 497kw. Once again I'm not saying its impossible but I seriously doubt the figure is accurate. To consider the rail would need to start at a base pressure of 75psi to get about 1400cc capacity, the flow of those pumps will decrease as the pressure increases.

Then to suggest it magically makes 80kw more than the pump should handle and 55kw more than the injectors can handle.....

I don't buy it

I'm not sure what pumps you have tested but none we have ever seen flow what you are saying in real world results.

fuelpumpgraph-3.jpg

which is also very similar to Bosch's technical data...

Capture-7.jpg

Not arguing that the power seems very generous for the set up, just mentioning that the dual pumps would cover the injectors easily

fuelpumpgraph-3.jpg

which is also very similar to Bosch's technical data...

Capture-7.jpg

Not arguing that the power seems very generous for the set up, just mentioning that the dual pumps would cover the injectors easily

The second one isn't Bosch's technical data and it's 10-15% more generous in its flow figures.

The first one is just whack.

Not Bosch's data? Really? I got it from here

http://www.bosch-mot..._2776426379.pdf

http://www.bosch.com.au/content/language1/downloads/fuelpumps.pdf

Then there is discrepancy between two pumps from the same company.

They also state in the above link that they are not to be used with E85 whereas your link clearly states that it is ok.

New version maybe?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...