Jump to content
SAU Community

Exhaust Woes


G0DZLR
 Share

Recommended Posts

after hmming and harring for months now i finally decided it was time for a new exhaust. simple, 2.5" straight through, couple of mufflers to hush it a bit but keep a note.

to cut a long story short, the 2.5" has taken away some of (enough to be quite noticable) my pickup. what i dont get is how a 2.5" can get worse performance than the stock 2 1/14" one that had a blitz cannon on it and a aftermarket resonater (EPA :) )

in more detail, the new system, 2.5" catback, what looks to be a big f**koff resonator (about 40cm long? :S) to a single muffler in the back (apparently one they use on 5.0L commodores) feeding to twin medium sized tips. just below 2k revs, it has the distinct sound of a clapped out VN commodore :).

im not happy anyway cos its way too loud, my exhaust dealer said the same, hence why havnt actually got a quote for the system as of yet, but i want to know why iv lost performance and what i can do to get it back and then some. i go back to the shop monday arvo to sort it out (getting a second muffler put in somewhere), so any ideas before then would be appreciated.

car in question is a bone stock SI R33 GTS25 non-turbo. RB25DE.

people have already said to put my cannon back on it to free it up a bit, its half tempting at this stage.

cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since it's a N/A engine, I'm actually not suprised you might be losing power, N/A engines create torque with backpressure in the exhaust , the RB25 isn't exactly a torque monster in N/A form either. There might be a more simpler answer, resetting your ECU or a leak somewhere in the exhaust

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since it's a N/A engine, I'm actually not suprised you might be losing power, N/A engines create torque with backpressure in the exhaust , the RB25 isn't exactly a torque monster in N/A form either. There might be a more simpler answer, resetting your ECU or a leak somewhere in the exhaust

i always thought it was the other way round, smaller exhausts on turbos otherwise the turbo would lag....hmmm.

so in theory, my old exhaust, with its one really weird bend, creates more backpressure, therefore is better for my performance now? :down:

other issue i thought of was heat soak, seeing as it has been 40+degrees the past 3 days down here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i always thought it was the other way round, smaller exhausts on turbos otherwise the turbo would lag....hmmm.

Nah exhausts on turbo cars have a big f*ckoff restriction in them already - the turbo's turbine. You want everything beyond to the turbo to be the lowest back pressure possible so the turbo's turbine sees the maximum pressure difference across its blades that it can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i always thought it was the other way round, smaller exhausts on turbos otherwise the turbo would lag....hmmm.

Nah buddy, bigger the better for turbocharge cars. 3"or 3.5".

so in theory, my old exhaust, with its one really weird bend, creates more backpressure, therefore is better for my performance now? ;)

Whatever brand / made exhaust system you had last time was probley designed for a N/A that was why its was good or suited your car very well.

other issue i thought of was heat soak, seeing as it has been 40+degrees the past 3 days down here

You don't really have to worry about it so much as you car is N/A.

Just make sure you engine oil and radiator fluids are up. If you have an airpod, then you can sheild it off to block out the heat or stick to your stock air box.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest 40th-edition
Since it's a N/A engine, I'm actually not suprised you might be losing power, N/A engines create torque with backpressure in the exhaust , the RB25 isn't exactly a torque monster in N/A form either. There might be a more simpler answer, resetting your ECU or a leak somewhere in the exhaust

not true, cant be bothered explaining read this if interested http://www.uucmotorwerks.com/html_product/...etorquemyth.htm

the only thing i have seen that has needed back pressure is some cars that get to faster flow will not let the O2 sensor get a accurate reading resulting in prolems.

may just feel slower? dyno it and see, would need to swap back to test

Edited by 40th-edition
Link to comment
Share on other sites

well interestingly enough, now the weathers cooled down a bit, took it for a spin after work, seems to be a bit quicker now. plenty of top end grunt but still lacking a bit in the lower revs.

taking it back to the shop Monday to get a second muffler fitted as it wasn't quite finished the other day, so hopefully with the addition of the second muffler, and addition to restriction, should regain me some back pressure :P

moral of the story i think is i shouldve got a 2.25" system instead. either way the stock system had to go (had the annoying metallic sound that all 33s get)

ED: 40th ed, the first part of that article is true, a stock engine with modified elements is bound to unbalance the rest, which is what iv done by the looks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest 40th-edition

yeah i didnt read the whole thing, spent 4 yrs learning all that shit.

its good to know so you dont waist money trying to gain hp with no rewards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So after some Chat GPT (yeah I know lol..) it turns out that the R35 GT-R BMC conversion may not be suitable for our shit boxes as it splits the fluid 60:40 instead of 70:30. When looking at possibly doing the 370Z conversion, it seems it's quite similar to how the R35 GT-R booster & BMC mounts up, however after some additional digging the 370Z BMC bore is the same size as a R33/34 GT-R BM57 one. Brake Pressure Split: Nissan 370Z: The typical front-to-rear brake pressure ratio for the 370Z is approximately 70:30. This is designed to handle the car’s weight distribution and performance characteristics, favoring the front brakes heavily due to weight transfer during braking. Nissan R33 GT-R: The front-to-rear brake pressure ratio for the R33 GT-R is also typically 70:30. However, this ratio is tuned for the GT-R's specific weight distribution and dynamic performance, considering its all-wheel-drive system and higher performance expectations. Despite having the same nominal 70:30 ratio, the actual distribution of braking force in practice can be different due to other factors like vehicle weight, ABS and EBD systems, and brake component sizes. Bore Sizes: The bore size of a brake master cylinder affects the hydraulic pressure generated within the braking system and can vary between different vehicles based on their braking requirements. Nissan 370Z: The brake master cylinder typically has a 1-inch (25.4 mm) primary bore. The secondary bore can vary slightly depending on specific trim levels and brake options, such as the Nismo version or those equipped with the Sport Package which features larger brakes. Nissan R33 GT-R: The brake master cylinder in the R33 GT-R generally has a 1-inch (25.4 mm) primary bore as well. Given the GT-R's high-performance context and advanced braking system, the bore size is designed to provide sufficient hydraulic pressure for its braking needs. Comparison: Brake Pressure Split: While both vehicles use a similar 70:30 ratio in the brake master cylinder design, the actual operational distribution might differ slightly due to differences in brake system components, vehicle dynamics, and tuning for each model. Bore Sizes: Both the 370Z and R33 GT-R use a master cylinder with a primary bore size of around 1 inch (25.4 mm). This similarity helps in providing robust hydraulic pressure for effective braking. Additional Considerations: Braking System Design: The overall brake system, including calipers, rotors, and the master cylinder, is designed to work as an integrated unit. Even with similar bore sizes and pressure splits, the performance and feel of the brakes can differ due to variations in brake pad composition, rotor size, and ABS tuning. ABS and EBD: Both vehicles are equipped with Anti-lock Braking Systems (ABS) and Electronic Brake-force Distribution (EBD), which further modulate and optimize braking force between the front and rear wheels dynamically, depending on driving conditions and brake demand. In essence, while the 370Z and R33 GT-R have some similarities in their brake master cylinder specifications, they are tuned to meet the specific performance and handling characteristics of each vehicle.   TL;DR, just use a R33 BM57 and call it a day.
    • Straight thru's have so little restriction that it's almost certainly not worth worrying about effects on tuning. Even a centre offset shouldn't upset things, but would be noticeably more effective (quiet).
    • I did say "2x Magnaflows" then referred to a Varex. So to un-confuse that, my rear muffler is hot-swappable with a Varex. When I had a RB Turbo, I had the 2x Magnaflows, then went LS and though "Oh that's way too loud" and ordered a Varex. A mid muffler will definitely help a lot, even if straight through. SP Mufflers can make anything as big or as small as possible, which will help even more. Looking at my own exhaust I could make the muffler twice as long if I wanted to. Or you could go crazy and get 2x mufflers from SP and full every remaining space with muffling. In my experience closing the Varex makes the car run VERY rich (obviously). I'd say adding a muffler *will* affect things, on a technical, physics level, but I don't think you'd need a retune as the actual effect would be the car running a *tiny* bit richer due to more restriction, on a strictly physics level, but you kind of don't have any option if you want the car to make less sound.
    • I must have read 100 DIY's and watched 200 DIY Youtube videos with most people saying just grab a new cover and, well, despite my normal aproach to these things (replace it all!!) I didn't get a cover. I don't know why I didn't, I'd already ordered a bunch of bits from FCP and it would have made perfect sense to put that in the order.  Anyway, I'm not getting OEM as its just crazy money, even from the states its 900 ish delivered. So, I got an OE Elring one, same as they sell at FCP but local so I can get this fixed this week. Our X5 is waiting for a new diff so we find ourselves in a common scenario of having 2 broken BMW's on the driveway! 🤣
    • Big thing is available inputs for sensors and not having to run multiple expander boxes and software packages for different things why motec is up there. The link ecu and an aim pdm32 was a combination I looked at early on so get ecu, dash and pdm in one go. Aim logging software is pretty good and has all the tracks I will ever drive. Having logging setup with tracks already available is a big thing for myself so can click drop down and go. Thing that I keep seeing is the support what's needed and having a package that people in the know are familiar with as learning a new platform is time consuming.    Got a few boxes that arrived with bits while I was away so hopefully will fit a few sensors and make a start on the dump pipe today. Going to be interesting fitting a 3.5 inch exhaust on this and keeping it above the chassis rails. 
×
×
  • Create New...