Jump to content
SAU Community

SAU Display  

49 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

I'm of the opinion that when SAU displays they display Skyline or Skyline related models.

Just think about it, does the Ferrari club allow people with other cars to become members yes, as does SAU. Do you expect a shitbox Sigma to be on display in the middle of the Ferrari's, NO.

SAU like most groups is inclusive of all, based upon a interest in the Skyline model. We should display Skylines so everyone can see the type of car they are expressing an interest in by being a "member" of SAU.

If SAU ACT wants to take a different direction and make this a generic car club, maybe we should request renaming the forum.

That is my quick summary, if others have an opposing opinion feel free to post below. What ever the group wants goes.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/258847-vote-on-skylines-australia-display/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I think being part of SAU is not owning a skyline, ie race snooze still pops in, Existanz owns a chaser and is a great guy. It's making a mountain out of a molehill, and you try telling Existanz not to park his car there on the day :(

edit: so yeah I don't mind a few non skylines on display as long as the majority of the cars are skylines

Well I think it is a good excuse to get the cars out, so maybe have the "Timeline' concept going, then have the other 'supporters' tag on the end....

I have a rather nice 1984 MR30 hatch, one of the first EFI L24 powered skyliner, so I guess I'll be near the start of the line!

post-32896-1235716689_thumb.jpg

I'm pretty sure its a given that all SAU members are welcome at Wheels. We can put all the models together and non Skylines together to fit with the theme, but we're not closing doors to any SAUers.

Even Richard can bring his Pooprah if he wants!

I enjoy having all of the SAUers not just the ones that have the skylines, why should they be excluded from bringing their car? SAU is for skyline lovers not skyline owners only. We dont need discriminating "rules" at our events.

I'm pretty sure its a given that all SAU members are welcome at Wheels. We can put all the models together and non Skylines together to fit with the theme, but we're not closing doors to any SAUers.

Even Richard can bring his Pooprah if he wants!

I'm wondering why this silly poll then?? :D

I'm wondering why this silly poll then?? :D

Maybe because people have differing opinions as you can see from the poll.

This is not about stopping anyone for attending any event, but about displaying the cars this forum is dedicated to.

I only asked those to post with differing opinions, which I welcome. Please don't infer from a few posts that everyone feels the same as you.

Off the subject but related, having been to a few motorcycle rallies when people started letting in cars, the rallies turned into camp outs for anyone that didn't feel they needed to bring a bike. The numbers initially went up, then dropped off to the point some rallies are not even running any more. The main focus the bike had been lost, it was a group of people with little in common which then turned into a small group of friends.

Is SAU a group of friends, or is it a forum dedicated to the passion of a marque of a motor car where everyone with the same interest can be friends.

I'm pretty sure its a given that all SAU members are welcome at Wheels. We can put all the models together and non Skylines together to fit with the theme, but we're not closing doors to any SAUers.

Even Richard can bring his Pooprah if he wants!

Supraman will be there 2moro in the treasury carpark and then in Struggle town to support the fire fighters and the peeps affected. I prolly wont go along to Wheels and line up with the SAU crew but I may just go along to perv at whats on display (candyshop). Still missing my b!atch too much...lol.

GTR holds ma heartstrings but the Supra is a tight peice of ass to have on the side :D

Edited by Sinista32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...