Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys. Well I don't have much experience when it comes to tyres. All mine have been cheapish until I could afford something decent so I chose to go with the Federal SS595's all round. Before I say anything about the fitment, the SS595's grip really well and I am really satisfied with them.

My rims are 17x8 on the front and 17x9 on the rear.

I used to run a 215/45R17 on the fronts, but after bolting on 25mm spacers I wanted to gain a bit of stretch in the tyre to reduce scrubbing on the guard.

I stayed the same on the rear, running 225/45's, and I am happy with the way they turned out with the Federals.

I had a friend (with experience) suggest me go a profile lower to the 215/40 on the front, so I did.

These are the results. The tyre does not look good at all and you can't even compare the look to the rear.

Does anybody know why this is? And can anybody suggest a solution (perhaps a better fitting tyre size) to go on the 17x8?

If anybody has a decent solution I'm willing to go back to the place and possibly ask to swap the tyres (even if I have to pay a bit more). I have probably only done about 20km max on them so far.

Front

DSC_0517ed.jpg

Rear

DSC_0507ed.jpg

Front & Rear

DSC_0503ed-1.jpg

Thanks in advance,

-Jimmy.

Edited by -Jimmy-
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/261088-just-bought-federal-ss595s/
Share on other sites

fronts look bulged out, are you sure theyre 215/40?

stick with 215/45/17

dont go to 40 profile, makes it look too skinny.

get rid of the 25mm spacer, its too big, downgrade to 15mm and stick with 215/45.

what offset are your rims? (before the 25mm spacer)

maybe its the way federal designed their tyres thats why it doesn't look at stretched as other tyre makes.

Well I was originally going to go the lower size (205) instead of profile, but I had someone say to me that it's the profile that will increase/decrease stretch etc.

+37 is the offset of the rims.

I think I read somewhere that these particular tyres have a fair amount of lip clearance or whatever, but oh well. Might suss out going the 45 then. More money to spend that I don't have.

Do you think I should risk asking for the 205/45 or just stay safe and go the 215/45 which I used to have.

Edited by -Jimmy-

Ok well as I said I'll see what I can do tomorrow, but most likely I won't be able to exchange it so I'll just have to live with what I got. I will get used to it. Thanks for your input.

Went back today. Basically the guy told me that Federal are very generous on giving the extra lip protection and blah blah, he knew I didn't like it because of the cosmetic purposes but yeah oh well. He says it's a good thing. I'm sure it is, I'll just have to get over it lol.

I had a friend (with experience) suggest me go a profile lower to the 215/40 on the front, so I did.
Information I have suggests that reducing the profile of the front tyres will tend to increase the tendency for understeer.

And why would you skimp on the tyre width by deliberately holding back on fitting the widest possible tyre on the available rim? Looks? The tyres are all that connect you to the road. Not much of a look after the skinny ones let go ...

They aren't ridiculously skinny, and it wasn't entirely for looks, it was so it wouldn't scrub the guard.

I'm convinced it doesn't look as bad as i thought now :verymad:

DSC_0472ed.jpg

-Jimmy.

Edited by -Jimmy-

Yeah nah, reducing width will increase stretch, not profile. Whoever told you that doesn't know what they are talking about.

Agreed with others though, go for a 215/45 next time around. Or if you want a bit more stretch, 205/50.

Stretched tyres are more inclined to understeer though. The sidewall needs to be able to flex to some extent to allow the tyre to maintain grip.

Ideally I'd say next time around go back to 215/45 and run 15mm spacers instead of 25mm.

Edited by Lupes

Front. 17x8 +37, effectively +12 with the 25mm spacer. 215/40R17 Federal SS595 tyre.

Rear. 17x9 +37, no spacer but plans to go 10-15mm. 225/45R17 Federal SS595 tyre.

Edited by -Jimmy-

Got pics? Also are they Federals? As I stated before, Federal seem to be very generous in their rim protectors versus other brands. Also your tyre being the 235 might compensate for being the lower profile.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi, SteveL Thank you very much for your reply, you seem to be the only person on the net who has come up with a definitive answer for which I am grateful. The "Leak" was more by way of wet bubbles when the pedal was depressed hard by a buddy while trying to gey a decent pedal when bleeding the system having fitted the rebuilt BM50 back in the car, which now makes perfect sense. A bit of a shame having just rebuilt my BM50, I did not touch the proportioning valve side of things, the BM50 was leaking from the primary piston seal and fluid was running down the the Brake booster hence the need to rebuild, I had never noticed any fluid leaking from that hole previously it only started when I refitted it to the car. The brake lines in the photo are "Kunifer" which is a Copper/Nickel alloy brake pipe, but are only the ones I use to bench bleed Master cylinders, they are perfectly legal to use on vehicles here in the UK, however the lines on the car are PVF coated steel. Thanks again for clearing this up for me, a purchase of a new BMC appears to be on the cards, I have been looking at various options in case my BM50 was not repairable and have looked at the HFM BM57 which I understand is manufactured in Australia.  
    • Well the install is officially done. Filled with fluid and bled it today, but didn't get a chance to take it on a test drive. I'll throw some final pics of the lines and whatnot but you can definitely install a DMAX rack in an R33 with pretty minor mods. I think the only other thing I had to do that isn't documented here is grind a bit of the larger banjo fitting to get it to clear since the banjos are grouped much tighter on the DMAX rack. Also the dust boots from a R33 do not fit either fyi, so if you end up doing this install for whatever reason you'll need to grab those too. One caveat with buying the S15 dust boots however is that the clamps are too small to fit on the R33 inner tie rod since they're much thicker so keep the old clamps around. The boots also twist a bit when adjusting toe but it's not a big deal. No issues or leaks so far, steering feels good and it looks like there's a bit more lock now than I had before. Getting an alignment on Saturday so I'll see how it feels then but seems like it'll be good to go       
    • I don't get in here much anymore but I can help you with this.   The hole is a vent (air relief) for the brake proportioning valve, which is built into the master cylinder.    The bad news is that if brake fluid is leaking from that hole then it's getting past the proportioning valve seals.   The really bad news is that no spare parts are available for the proportioning valve either from Nissan or after market.     It's a bit of a PITA getting the proportioning valve out of the master cylinder body anyway but, fortunately, leaks from that area are rare in my experience. BTW, if those are copper (as such) brake lines you should get rid of them.    Bundy (steel) tube is a far better choice (and legal  in Australia - if that's where you are).
×
×
  • Create New...