Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys. Well I don't have much experience when it comes to tyres. All mine have been cheapish until I could afford something decent so I chose to go with the Federal SS595's all round. Before I say anything about the fitment, the SS595's grip really well and I am really satisfied with them.

My rims are 17x8 on the front and 17x9 on the rear.

I used to run a 215/45R17 on the fronts, but after bolting on 25mm spacers I wanted to gain a bit of stretch in the tyre to reduce scrubbing on the guard.

I stayed the same on the rear, running 225/45's, and I am happy with the way they turned out with the Federals.

I had a friend (with experience) suggest me go a profile lower to the 215/40 on the front, so I did.

These are the results. The tyre does not look good at all and you can't even compare the look to the rear.

Does anybody know why this is? And can anybody suggest a solution (perhaps a better fitting tyre size) to go on the 17x8?

If anybody has a decent solution I'm willing to go back to the place and possibly ask to swap the tyres (even if I have to pay a bit more). I have probably only done about 20km max on them so far.

Front

DSC_0517ed.jpg

Rear

DSC_0507ed.jpg

Front & Rear

DSC_0503ed-1.jpg

Thanks in advance,

-Jimmy.

Edited by -Jimmy-
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/261088-just-bought-federal-ss595s/
Share on other sites

fronts look bulged out, are you sure theyre 215/40?

stick with 215/45/17

dont go to 40 profile, makes it look too skinny.

get rid of the 25mm spacer, its too big, downgrade to 15mm and stick with 215/45.

what offset are your rims? (before the 25mm spacer)

maybe its the way federal designed their tyres thats why it doesn't look at stretched as other tyre makes.

Well I was originally going to go the lower size (205) instead of profile, but I had someone say to me that it's the profile that will increase/decrease stretch etc.

+37 is the offset of the rims.

I think I read somewhere that these particular tyres have a fair amount of lip clearance or whatever, but oh well. Might suss out going the 45 then. More money to spend that I don't have.

Do you think I should risk asking for the 205/45 or just stay safe and go the 215/45 which I used to have.

Edited by -Jimmy-

Ok well as I said I'll see what I can do tomorrow, but most likely I won't be able to exchange it so I'll just have to live with what I got. I will get used to it. Thanks for your input.

Went back today. Basically the guy told me that Federal are very generous on giving the extra lip protection and blah blah, he knew I didn't like it because of the cosmetic purposes but yeah oh well. He says it's a good thing. I'm sure it is, I'll just have to get over it lol.

I had a friend (with experience) suggest me go a profile lower to the 215/40 on the front, so I did.
Information I have suggests that reducing the profile of the front tyres will tend to increase the tendency for understeer.

And why would you skimp on the tyre width by deliberately holding back on fitting the widest possible tyre on the available rim? Looks? The tyres are all that connect you to the road. Not much of a look after the skinny ones let go ...

They aren't ridiculously skinny, and it wasn't entirely for looks, it was so it wouldn't scrub the guard.

I'm convinced it doesn't look as bad as i thought now :verymad:

DSC_0472ed.jpg

-Jimmy.

Edited by -Jimmy-

Yeah nah, reducing width will increase stretch, not profile. Whoever told you that doesn't know what they are talking about.

Agreed with others though, go for a 215/45 next time around. Or if you want a bit more stretch, 205/50.

Stretched tyres are more inclined to understeer though. The sidewall needs to be able to flex to some extent to allow the tyre to maintain grip.

Ideally I'd say next time around go back to 215/45 and run 15mm spacers instead of 25mm.

Edited by Lupes

Front. 17x8 +37, effectively +12 with the 25mm spacer. 215/40R17 Federal SS595 tyre.

Rear. 17x9 +37, no spacer but plans to go 10-15mm. 225/45R17 Federal SS595 tyre.

Edited by -Jimmy-

Got pics? Also are they Federals? As I stated before, Federal seem to be very generous in their rim protectors versus other brands. Also your tyre being the 235 might compensate for being the lower profile.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I seem to the be only person that is using a Haltech 2500 on an NA motor, I've installed a Bosch DBW throttle body to the OEM intake manifold and am having problems maintaining AFR even with the wideband o2.  It will run extremely rich at idle and up to redline, but under load it will go extremely lean in the 20s and i'm essentially having to rev it over 4k and feather the clutch to get it up to speed.  I've read a few other threads of about the butterfly, it seems removing the vacuum to it is supposed to have it remain open, i've noticed no difference under 4k with the vacuum line to it plugged.  I'm hoping someone here has had luck using the NA manifold with Haltech, and if they happen to have a tune for it.  
    • I don't know any details, but I really wouldn't be surprised if they do it as a LHD only version, at least initially.
    • Thanks for the replies everyone. Definitely a coolant push. Oil catch can is empty and always has been. As the engine is out now I'll be having a good look over things. I do have some detonation on the piston tops from a trigger issue back about 5 years ago. I felt it and shut off then bought a new ecu and changed the trigger. Never been an issue since. It never hurt the power, its made almost 80hp more since that incident but I will pull the bearing caps to take a look. If the bearings are damaged I will do a bottom end refresh. Head is being re conditioned at the moment and the block will be cleaned and checked to ensure it's flat. I'll go with a kameari gasket and see how it ends up. The other thing I'm not super keen on is the cylinder colours. I suspect this is from the inlet manifold. The plan will be to put it back together, retune and then stick a plazmaman billet inlet on it and retune. I'm happy with the power, if it makes a little more, then great, but I would rather just make everything more efficient at this stage.
    • Maybe they'll look to do a bunch of presales to help inject some cash fast for their financial issues...
    • Does it also misfire equally when revving?   Josh is very correct in what you should do. The coilpack harness wiring loom itself is a known problem due to its age and the number of heat cycles it has gone through. Throwing parts at a vehicle to diagnose the issue isn't a smart or good way to do it. Secondly, you may have a bad coil pack, you pop replacements in, they fix that issue, but messing with the harness breaks it, so the issue persists. So now you think "well it wasn't the coil packs" and have to continue chasing your tail, potentially swapping back in your shit coil packs and returning the good ones (yes, I've seen people do this because 'it wasn't the problem' and they want to save money). And suddenly, you've got two issues with the same symptoms...   Diagnose, don't use the spare parts shotgun.
×
×
  • Create New...