Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello

I currently have a RB25 turbo on my RB20. I am thinking about upgrading to a bigger turbo because I want to hit 200rwk and up. Goal is 250rwk

What would be better, high flowing the RB25 turbo? High flowing the original RB20 turbo? Going with a HKS GTRS turbo? 2530 Turbo? Or TD06?

I want to have good response and have a fast car. I use the car as a daily driver but I do hit it on the high way sometimes and plan to take it to the track once or twice a year.

Help please.

250kw is a fair bit for a 20, in this case you cant have good response/midrange.

Look in the RB20 Turbo upgrade thread. Most of your answers are in there.

A 2530 is too small for 250kw.

250kw is a fair bit for a 20, in this case you cant have good response/midrange.

Look in the RB20 Turbo upgrade thread. Most of your answers are in there.

A 2530 is too small for 250kw.

So you are saying that if I go for 250rwkw I will have a lag machine?

250kw is a fair bit for a 20, in this case you cant have good response/midrange.

Look in the RB20 Turbo upgrade thread. Most of your answers are in there.

A 2530 is too small for 250kw.

I tried to go through the thread but it just seems to be results and it doesn't really answer my questions. I just want a hard firm answer from someone please.

I am in this same boat as you, I am almost convinced the way forward for 200+rwkw is to upgrade to a RB25DET as the lag issue is not what I'm wanting either plus there is great benefit in a better torque curve from the 25, I will be watchin this thread to see if someone can answer you with a better solution rather than just tellin you to go search which I believe you have done and thus the reason for this thread

another option is to go the RB25 crank and effectively perform a stroker upgrade which i am currently investigating too

Just to give you an idea. I whacked on some bits on a friends R32.

The stock rb20 turbo made 150rwkw on roughly 16psi.

The rb25hf made 210rwkw on 16psi with 640cc injectors, fmic, 3" turbo back.

Both times it was mapped with a nistune board. The RB25HF isn't to laggy either.

I am in this same boat as you, I am almost convinced the way forward for 200+rwkw is to upgrade to a RB25DET as the lag issue is not what I'm wanting either plus there is great benefit in a better torque curve from the 25, I will be watchin this thread to see if someone can answer you with a better solution rather than just tellin you to go search which I believe you have done and thus the reason for this thread

another option is to go the RB25 crank and effectively perform a stroker upgrade which i am currently investigating too

There is no doubt that an RB20 is breathless compared to the bigger displacement RBs when under 3,000rpm and off boost. BUT do not underestimate the grunt and speed you can get out of a std RB20. There isnt an RB25 going to the track with SAU-VIC that can catch my 260rwkws RB20 at the track. That includes a 320rwkws R34 GTT. Similar power SR20s are also slower, so...dont write off the internally std RB20 as laggy and no good for performance.

For a punchy street car, yes they are compromised. But for outright performance they can match up to GT3 Porkas with no real problem at speed.

So for all those people saying no good from 200rwkws. Well have a look at the below graphs

STD RB20 with a TD06 turbo and ECU upgrade

gallery_462_50_59282.jpg

Compared to a std turbo RB26 with Poncams, and same dyno and same tuner

Dyno_220305.jpg

As you would expect the Rb26 spanks the RB20 down low, but it has a usable rev range over at usable road speeds. You can see the RB20 punches well above its weight being comparable to a well sorted (breathing mods) std turbo RB26 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And here is the results from a program where it compares different dyno plots, and as you can see my RB20 isnt struggling against a pair of similar powered RB25s from R34s with Hi FLows and Poncams.

Keep in mind behind every engine is a gearbox, diff and tyres, so it means DICK at what rpm you make power, its all about at what road speeds you are making good power over !

gallery_462_50_14883.jpg

Similar setup to Roy's RB20 both with TD06L2

wheezy.jpg

So how is the daily driving with these RB 20's? I was thinking about the TD06. Is it laggy? How can I improve the low? Cams?

Edited by 335

Cams will only move the curve up a little and fatten up mid range power.

Displacement will fix your solution.

Mine is not a daily, I believe that Roy\Ronin's still are.

I can't really comment here as I NEVER drive it in city traffic. Thats what a daily driver is for.

But, with a nice quiet exhaust, plumbed back wastegate and some paitence you might be alright. It would be no different to any other import with say a button clutch of sorts.

Its all gas, break, honk for everyone in traffic. Lag would not really come into play.

I dont undestand what people mean by is it ok for daily driving...lol of course it is. It drives like an NA 2L and has 100rwkws in the rev range you use on the street. If by daily driver you mean a car you can thrash on the street then no way a TD06 is for you. In second gear is does not sit you in your seat until 60km/h.

But i am a boring old fart, have never been booked for anything in my life as on the street i keep it all pent up. I get to the track and i rape my poor car. :P So for daily driving, i dont get it, most streets are 50km/h to 80km/h....you dont need 260rwkw for that :down:

If you are in Vic i suggest you come to the next SAU Vic DECA day. Russman would be happy to scare the shit out of you with his driving in his R32 running a 2530 and abtou 230rwkws, and i can take you for a spin in my TD06. You will definitely get a feel for the respective strengths of each setup....

But when you say street driving, you need to be honest with yourself and think about what sort of driving it is that you do on the street

Agreed, 260rwkw RB20's are no fun on the street, you cant do much with them. Lighting up 2nd gear every time your tyres are cold is not my idea of fun.

You will just end up with no license. :P

I dont undestand what people mean by is it ok for daily driving...lol of course it is. It drives like an NA 2L and has 100rwkws in the rev range you use on the street. If by daily driver you mean a car you can thrash on the street then no way a TD06 is for you. In second gear is does not sit you in your seat until 60km/h.

But i am a boring old fart, have never been booked for anything in my life as on the street i keep it all pent up. I get to the track and i rape my poor car. :P So for daily driving, i dont get it, most streets are 50km/h to 80km/h....you dont need 260rwkw for that :down:

If you are in Vic i suggest you come to the next SAU Vic DECA day. Russman would be happy to scare the shit out of you with his driving in his R32 running a 2530 and abtou 230rwkws, and i can take you for a spin in my TD06. You will definitely get a feel for the respective strengths of each setup....

But when you say street driving, you need to be honest with yourself and think about what sort of driving it is that you do on the street

Ok GTRS are good for response while the TD06 is good for flat out speed.

I live in Japan. I live in a area where its close to Yokohama so there are a lot of places to hit the gas here, especially on the highway. There are famous places here highway wise where the Japanese and foreign people living here take their rides to display and race.

It is expensive to use the track here so I will only do that maybe once or twice a year.

I want to have good response as well has having good speed.

Which would be the better option: highflow the RB25 turbo on my RB20, by a GTRS(2530), or go TD06 or something?

I am planning to start buying parts to upgrade my car more.

TD06-20G is more responsive then GT-RS and makes more power. My car went back to back with another SAU guy on dynos to compare setups. We run similar exhausts, same IC and filter from memory, he ran a botl on GT-RS i ran a full Greddy TD06-20G setup. The cars have different tuners, but the 20G made more power and was more responsive.

A GT-RS is not the same as a 2530, the 2530 is smaller.

The more power thing could be attributed to the fact that i was running 2psi more, but i think at the same boost the 20G would have still made a few kws more and would have of course still been more responsive

TD06-20G is more responsive then GT-RS and makes more power. My car went back to back with another SAU guy on dynos to compare setups. We run similar exhausts, same IC and filter from memory, he ran a botl on GT-RS i ran a full Greddy TD06-20G setup. The cars have different tuners, but the 20G made more power and was more responsive.

A GT-RS is not the same as a 2530, the 2530 is smaller.

The more power thing could be attributed to the fact that i was running 2psi more, but i think at the same boost the 20G would have still made a few kws more and would have of course still been more responsive

You mentioned earlier that I would not see any boost with the TD06 until 60 kmh, how would the car drive until then? Would it be slow? Would a GT-RS be a good compromise?

Want to make sure I get it right. The 25 turbo is pretty good but want to make sure when I upgrade that I don't lose response.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When you crank your car, and hit it with a timing light, can you see a steady crank timing?
    • Oh, forgot to add, A few months ago I was getting mixture codes and the car was using crap loads of fuel. You could smell the unburned fuel in the exhaust, it was crazy strong. Economy was over 17.5 l/100 and usually around 19. I smoked the engine and found a leaky CCV hose which I replaced and then I replaced my two pre cat O2 sensors, I also replaced the MAF. This fixed my mixture codes and improved my exonomy but I'm still 14 - 15 l/100 when pottering about town so something is still amiss. Throttle response is much better and it has more pep but I'd like to know why it's still so thirsty (and I'm hoping that whatever it is gives me a bit more poke).    
    • Car is on factory injectors/z32 maf/ q45 throttle body/ z32 ecu with nistune 
    • Hello all, currently finishing up a rb25 swap into my s14. Having issues with starting, car has spark (confirmed by pulling a plug and watching it spark), has fuel(confirmed by checking pulse/voltage at injectors all spark plugs are soaked in fuel). Car cranks over and pops into the exhaust with a heavy fuel smell but no attempt to start or run, I have torn the timing cover off and triple confirmed timing, turned the CAS in multiple spots both directions, attempted to start with coolant temp and maf unplugged, checked my fuel lines and made sure they weren’t backwards, checked voltage at cas/injectors/coilpacks, made sure all the grounds in the harness are connected and added a few grounding straps (1 from chassis to block, 1 from chassis to head, and 1 from chassis to igniter chip) I am getting stumped here. As a last ditch effort I made a full grounding harness tonight that’s going to run from the battery and add an extra ground from the battery onto the coil pack harness/igniter chip/ intake manifold/ Wiring specialties harness ground/ and alternator. I’m hoping maybe the grounding harness will fix it here but posting here to see if anyone has any other ideas on what else I can check. My fuel pressure is unknown right gauge will be here tomorrow.  IMG_3206.mov
    • yeah I was shocked when I checked my spare OEM on and as below that's how they come from Nissan. (side interesting note new NEO gearbox and replacement park lack the brass bush on the tips and its just all alloy) unsure about damage to the box currently back at 1110 to be pulled down/inspected and selector fork replaced as he built it previously and given the never before seen failure on his billet forks he is replacing it under warranty. He said he has used always OEM the keyway tab without issue for years so it could be an unlucky coincidence. I did talk to him about the sharp corners and stress concentration too. Re: hard shifts i got 7+ years out of the OEM one and the fork itself failed not the keyway. so could be bad luck as I said or an age thing + heat cycles in box and during fabrication of billet?
×
×
  • Create New...