Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Here's a simple test.

First, obtain a tennis ball in the opposite hand that you throw with.

Subsequently, go outside your house, find a nice spacious brick wall, and through it at the wall.

Then, inspect the wall to see if there is any damage...

Same principle applies to air hitting the turbo fins.... :):ph34r:

Yeah we gather the fact that pressurised air won't damage metal compressor fins.

I am much more worried about the shock loading on the bearing cartridge as the wall of pressurised air hits the rapidly spinning compressor :D:bunny::bunny:

i.e. your simple tests mean shit (thats why I raised you 1 bunny)

Edited by 09ONE_32
  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I would just like to throw out there that there are a lot of "problems" in the automotive world that MUST be fixed that like to pop up right after somebody starts making a product to "fix" said problem. It seems like people make a product and invent the "problem" to sell their wears.

I would just like to throw out there that there are a lot of "problems" in the automotive world that MUST be fixed that like to pop up right after somebody starts making a product to "fix" said problem. It seems like people make a product and invent the "problem" to sell their wears.

Like how the sales of bottled water took off after the statistic was released stating that we need to drink at least 2l a day?

Yeah we gather the fact that pressurised air won't damage metal compressor fins.

I am much more worried about the shock loading on the bearing cartridge as the wall of pressurised air hits the rapidly spinning compressor :bunny::bunny::bunny:

i.e. your simple tests mean shit (thats why I raised you 1 bunny)

To see how compressed air will affect the bearing cartridge, perform the following:

Place a Ping-Pong Ball and hold it with your big toe in the foot you use the least.

Try and throw it at a brick wall.

Sample principle applies to compressed air having a load on the bearing cartridge.

Your bunnies don't mean shit, that's why I raised you a bananna (which is worth 3.34 times that of the bunny) :banana:

Age old debate that people seem to miss the main physics of...

Blades don't stop spinning... The blades are setup uni directional, that is, spin them one way, they move air, spin them the other, they do 2/5ths of f**k all.

Secondly, the "chopping" noise is the fact that the pressure applied by turbo is less then that in the pipe, so high pressure flows out the cooler pipes towards air filter.

Suddenly, pressure applied by turbo is greater, so some air gets sucked back in. Making a low pressure... This process continues... Making sound waves...

No damage to turbo.

Also, for those stating it causes more lag between gear shifts, it only causes more lag if you keep the pressure source for the wastegate on the IC piping. Run it to the manifold, no issues what so ever.

Also, for those stating it causes more lag between gear shifts, it only causes more lag if you keep the pressure source for the wastegate on the IC piping. Run it to the manifold, no issues what so ever.

interesting. please explain.

150,000km's on the stock turbo running 1 bar with no bov sold with no shaft play then went on to a larger turbo for a good 70,000km's no bov @ 1bar, sold with no issues and now a bigger turbo again for 20,000km's no bov with no issues running upwards of 24psi.

I found it reduced lag on gear changes especially noticeable when putting in around traffic slightly on boost with all - straight off the actuator (pressure source comp housing), with an MBC and now with an EBC.

And... Nothing wrong with the ol' VLT's.

I personally hate the sound of aftermarket atmo bov's. For myself its either a a tight aftermarket recirc bov that doesn't vent until 20psi odd or no bov at all.

VLT's have been getting around with no bovs running close to 2bar since some of you were in nappies.

IMO emissions and drive ability at part throttle is all bovs are for. :laugh:

Edited by TheRogue

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, this is one of the most annoying things about nissan part numbers... I've got an unrelated example... Image is of the AT output shaft ~ they have the same part#, but clearly the shaft on the left is beefier design to that on the right ...the difference (essentially) is the 'lighter' shaft on the right, is for engines up to RB25DE (this includes RB20 variants) : the shaft on the left is for RB25/26DET(T)....are they interchangeable? Yes...but obviously one shaft is going to be stronger than the other...and, the lighter shaft is around USD115, but the heavier shaft closer to USD150...same part#... ...epc-data usually tells a tale ~ the amayama listing for 39100-23U60 has a note "Longest side is between 60 and 105 cm" ; no such info is there for 39100-23U70 ...and given the great disparity in price between the 2 parts, it makes me at least curious (to the point of caution) where the 'extra money' went? ...ie; these 2 parts have a cost difference that (to myself at least) isn't explained by 'plastic boot'...ie; with amayama there's AUD700 price difference ...plastic versus rubber?...I'm not seeing it like that...and 60cm ~ 105cm...??...that's a huge disparity....something hinky going on here... I'd try searching by VIN, not model... /2cents
    • I don't know for sure, but I'd expect them all to be interchangeable given the diff end and hub end don't move/change between any C34 series. Often Nissan will change part numbers and the aftermarket follows those year ranges; but the original part number change doesn't mean other parts won't fit. The change could be a change in material, internal parts or even just supplier. For example, all the RB gearbox to engine bolts are no longer available and there is a new part number instead. The only change is they went from cadmium plated bolts to zinc plated due to the issues manufacturing with Cadmium. They look different but work the same.
    • One year is a bit concerning. Did you try contacting GSP? It says 5 year warranty on the box if I remember correctly. I'm also running their driveshafts on my S2 Stagea.   You could check the part numbers on Amayama for your year. Here's the link for my 1998 which gives the 39100-23U60 part number. Well, that and 39100-23U70. https://www.amayama.com/en/genuine-catalogs/epc/nissan-japan/stagea/wgnc34/6649-rb25det/trans/391 What does it say for yours?
    • I ordered a GSP Front R/H Axle from here - https://justjap.com/products/gsp-premium-front-driveshaft-r-h-nissan-r32-r33-r34-skyline-gtr-stagea-4wd#description It lasted around a year before one of the boots blew out. I'm lowered, but I have GKTech roll center adjusters. One year seems a little premature. I think I'm going to spend the extra money on an OEM cv axle this time. This website - https://tfaspeed.com/collections/nissan-stagea-wgnc34-x-four-parts/products/nissan-stagea-awc34-260rs-rb26-right-front-axle-drive-assembly Makes it sound like the readily available OEM CV axle will only fit 11.1999 Stagea and up (mine is a 2.1997 S1). The JustJap listing didn't mention any years or anything for the GSP axle. Amayama shows '11.1999' and up as well for that part number. As well as 'plastic boot type'. See attached picture. So I guess my question is, does that axle (39100-23U60) really only fit S2 Stagea? It's the front driver side. If it does, I'd love to buy that instead of rolling the dice on another GSP. I've found that OEM one cheaper here: https://www.partsfornissans.com/oem-parts/nismo-jdm-r32-r33-r34-skyline-gtr-r32-gts4-right-front-axle-3910023u60 and here https://www.nissanparts.cc/oem-parts/nismo-shaft-ft-drive-3910023u60 Just a little confused because the JapSpeed listing for the GSP front driver axle doesn't mention any specific years or anything and it fit my S1 Stagea fine. So will 39100-23U60 fit my S1 Stagea even though technically it says '11.1999' and up? What would have changed? Thanks.  
    • Thanks for the info. The only "Issue" I've had with the shifter is I always found the throw between 4th and 6th gear too close. I'm always worried to shift into 4th accidently and sending my motor to the moon. Adam LZ recently came out with a video and stated Serialnine revised their shifters to correct this and will change all the revised parts for 150$. Strangely enough, I contacted Serialnine right after and they denied it and said it's bullshit. I found that strange as he's a distributer. I'll keep this forum post updated on that saga.
×
×
  • Create New...