Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So some of you guys know I (and some others) love to get into big debates over american hp vs. aussie hp. I do think they can be different (but I will not accept one figure is "better" or more "accurate" than the other.) Many figures that are posted on here from around the world are shot down because they don't match the hp to mph figures you guys have. I have combed the dyno results threads and see no mph stats for a most of the posts. I was wondering if some of the experts could give some hp to mph ballpark figures for different body styles (or weights really). Examples........

R32 GTSt's are around 3000lb?

100mph-110mph = XXXrwhp'ish

110mph-120mph = XXXrwhp'ish

120mph-130mph = XXXrwhp'ish

R33 GTSt's are around 3300lb?

100mph-110mph = XXXrwhp'ish

110mph-120mph = XXXrwhp'ish

120mph-130mph = XXXrwhp'ish

R32 GTR's are around 3300lb?

100mph-110mph = XXXrwhp'ish

110mph-120mph = XXXrwhp'ish

120mph-130mph = XXXrwhp'ish

Also, how would AWD effect that equation? I think a R32 GTR weighs about the same as a R33 GTSt, correct? Would the same mph to hp figure be true? Obviously the E.T.'s are going to vary a lot with all cars depending on suspension, tires, driver, track, etc. For example, my best mph (with a Gtec) has been 127mph in a R32 GTSt. What kind of hp would you guess I'm making (o jeez, I just asked that question. Sorry :banana: )

Again, I'm just looking for broad ballpark estimates, not figures I could hold anybody too.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Subscription post.

There is one thing I would like to point out that you have said about suspension, tyres and various other setups that will make the car perform differently, and we don't need an American to have an arguement...we have enough between ourselves lol,

and that is take one engine...Engine = 1000hp, put engine into car A. Car A has a 'no-expense-spared' and no stone unturned approach for the build up. Car A does 8.00 at 180mph. Pull engine out and Put in Car B with less spent and not as many improvements for a completely dedicated drag car, it is driven on the street. Car B does 10.00 at 165mph.

We have a couple of examples of this in Australia where engines are borrowed (and those figures above do not represent any particular one) and the times, and MPH will differ dramatically.

I still maintain that MPH is not an accurate indication of HP but moreso an accurate indication of a cars potential to do a better time and the fact that it's 'setup' may not be perfect.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/#findComment-4553176
Share on other sites

If you are conserned with mph vs hp. go the extra step and put weight into it too.

Google 1/4 mile calculators from weight, et, and hp and it should give you a close enough answer.

letstorquebhp.com is a good site. You can select from 4wd, rwd to fwd too :)

Hope this helps

Edited by R33GOD
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/#findComment-4553258
Share on other sites

I still maintain that MPH is not an accurate indication of HP but moreso an accurate indication of a cars potential to do a better time and the fact that it's 'setup' may not be perfect.

I would completly agree with that. Example, my times/mph are on drift type Cusco suspension, a factory viscous, 275/40R17 drag radials, and NOT on a prepped track (or any "track" for that matter :) ). I think with a better drag set up (and maybe a driver mod), I would not only have much better E.T.'s, but also a higher mph. I spin completly through 1st and 2nd gears. Glad you like the idea of the thread too :D I was worried it would be recieved as a "how much hp do I have?" post.

Also, R33god if you'll notice I did specify in the post weight (via chassis type) was a must for info.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/#findComment-4553277
Share on other sites

If you are conserned with mph vs hp. go the extra step and put weight into it too.

Google 1/4 mile calculators from weight, et, and hp and it should give you a close enough answer.

letstorquebhp.com is a good site. You can select from 4wd, rwd to fwd too :)

Hope this helps

Im suspect about those to be honest as sometimes they say my car should have made 250rwkw to run 110mph, but i know thats not right :D

For the record i've run the following:

1480kg (3280lb) - i weight in @ 80kg's

220rwkw (296rwhp)

110mph

From what ive understand, thats pretty much spot on the money :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/#findComment-4553357
Share on other sites

There is alot of variables that go with each persons car, so i think it would be a good idea to state not only what power and weight of car, but also what tyres and sizes along with ratio of diffs ect. Idealy to build up a diary of info it would be best to use one car,one dyno and one track and driver also performing mods as you go i would think, but im sure you could get some rough power figures v mph

Edited by SilverCal
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/#findComment-4553908
Share on other sites

I know you can usually tell from avatars or screen names, but just to get people in the habit, make sure you post body type and/or weight if known. I don't think we need wheel size and gears and stuff. To much clutter for ballpark figures.

Keep it coming guys, good stuff. Maybe what type of dyno used also?

Edited by Cjmartz2k
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/#findComment-4553914
Share on other sites

While various things play a part, you can still get a very good idea of where a setup 'should' be roughly with either ET or MPH if you know what car/weight and so on.

Street rubber tends to let the MPH increase a tad, where stickier seems to lower it a bit because you get to the end sooner (due to a nice low 60ft)

Recent case with R33 GTR kid, his MPH was very low for the power he had, turns out he didn't actually have that power due to a leak somewhere and less boost/power that he didnt know about.

So there is very much good merit too it

Yeah and I did a 13.6 @ 109.6 mph with 260rwkw in a 32 GTST.

260rwkw in such a light car would be good for a 115+mph, and deep into the 12s if you keep at it!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/#findComment-4554001
Share on other sites

yeah mph doesnt seem to get effect greatly by tyres/ratios/60ft time. hp vs weight, you should get pretty damn close to the mph regardless of setup, unless your talking about something rediculous that you have to pedal the whole way down the 1/4

edit - refer to morosso calculator for what your car 'should' run

Edited by VB-
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/#findComment-4554026
Share on other sites

Also take into effect power curve...

Really, it's the area under the torque curve that gets you down the strip quickest... :)

500RWHP Dyno queens are CONSTANTLY shown up on the strip by 300RWHP STREET cars... Purely, as the 500RWHP car has the worlds shittest power delivery...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/#findComment-4554212
Share on other sites

Also take into effect power curve...

Really, it's the area under the torque curve that gets you down the strip quickest... :)

500RWHP Dyno queens are CONSTANTLY shown up on the strip by 300RWHP STREET cars... Purely, as the 500RWHP car has the worlds shittest power delivery...

A laggy motor will show zero lag if launched hard enough at drags and 99% of them wont drop boost between gears either (unless its something that doesnt come on till 6000rpm etc). Maybe a 5th gear roll on yer but from standing start no chance.

I run a t04z and car is hopeless below 4k rpm but at the drags it launches like a rocket and not one hint of lag and the time refects that. Maybe running a gt47 or twin gt3540s or something, but not a 500hp car which is gt35 or t04z territory.

mine weighs 1750kg and does 124.6mph, dyno shows 560rwhp.

Edited by unique1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/#findComment-4554407
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...